Jump to content

Rangers vs St Mirren 2nd February


Recommended Posts

You are right, mate, but the thread has gone beyond common sense, as ours tend to do. Just look at the posts made in the past hour.  Do you think that the G&G fannies who pollute our threads are interested? 

 

Is that the G&G fannies who have been slating Dallas for being an honest yet horrendously poor referee?  

The same Fannies that commented on his poor decision to give Celtic a pen at hampden and not to send off Allen for a horror tackle on Rossiter?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 475
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 

9 minutes ago, Bobby_F said:

The second dive is so unbelievable clear anyone saying it isn't is absolutely at the wind up.

It was like a rugby player tackled just before the try line who then throws himself over the line to get the try.

In this case the Rangers player was fouled about a yard outside the box, then dived over the line to try to win a penalty.

Clear as day that that's what he did.

Having watched the replays it’s not even up for debate, both Defoe and the candy man blatantly dived to get the decision. The peepul are in full scale meltdown as the paranoia kicks in yet again. They are an utterly tragic shower of entitled morons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bobby_F said:

The second dive is so unbelievable clear anyone saying it isn't is absolutely at the wind up.

It was like a rugby player tackled just before the try line who then throws himself over the line to get the try.

Worst analogy ever.  You don't watch/haven't played much rugby, mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Greenlantern said:

 


Does that include Dermot 'strip the titles' Gallagher?

 

 

Nah, Michael Stewart has basically dismissed him as an idiot who knows heehaw about fitba.....

 

 

@mstewart_23
·
39m

Dermot Gallaghers analysis of the Dallas penalty incidents is lacking any real insight and makes incorrect assertions. It simply doesn’t stand any scrutiny

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom Boyd and John Hartson in the papers... Sevco get all the decisions and celtic get none.

 

Despite winning seven in a row, the paranoia is back...bigger and stronger than ever....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bennett said:

Tom Boyd and John Hartson in the papers... Sevco get all the decisions and celtic get none.

 

Despite winning seven in a row, the paranoia is back...bigger and stronger than ever....

 

Did Boyd not take part in that Spinal Tap-esque satire "Anyone But Celtic" film?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AW saint said:

People need to look at this properly. This is not a Rangers problem or a bias as such. This is to do with sn incompetent referree. Weither you think it was 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 penalties there are question marks over the majority of them. Dallas should be carpeted for his inability to referee. 

Yup, a clear example of Dallas' incompetence, to the point where fan pressure should force the authorities to act.

Instead Rangers and Celtic fans have set phasers to "complain about every decision against them for the past 19 years/whataboutery" and the SFA are able to hide behind that smokescreen and just ignore what Dallas done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we had a lucky escape to be honest.

Given what Klopp is saying this morning about Liverpool being disadvantaged last night through being given a goal that was clearly offside and then the referee overcompensating against them subsequently, it is good that Dallas overcompensated in our favour for the rest of our game after the "dubious" 4 penalty awards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AllyM said:

I think we had a lucky escape to be honest.

Given what Klopp is saying this morning about Liverpool being disadvantaged last night through being given a goal that was clearly offside and then the referee overcompensating against them subsequently, it is good that Dallas overcompensated in our favour for the rest of our game after the "dubious" 4 penalty awards.

Well he didn't give the one for the stonewall Morelos dive. Definitely did his best to even things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, The_Kincardine said:

Worst analogy ever.  You don't watch/haven't played much rugby, mate.

I was actually at Murrayfield on Saturday rather than having to suffer watching my team play at that hate filled cauldron of bigotry.

It's an excellent analogy. Candelas was fouled just short of the line which would give them an almost certain goal - so he makes a second movement to get over the line.

Reason this analogy came to mind was because of a TMO on an England try v Ireland where 'second movement' was being checked to see if it was a legal try.

Was pretty much what Candelas did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, AllyM said:

I think we had a lucky escape to be honest.

Given what Klopp is saying this morning about Liverpool being disadvantaged last night through being given a goal that was clearly offside and then the referee overcompensating against them subsequently, it is good that Dallas overcompensated in our favour for the rest of our game after the "dubious" 4 penalty awards.

Klopp totally ignoring the fact they very nearly grabbed a late winner from another obvious off side 

Yet another Liverpool eyeing up a job at Celtic after he fails at Liverpool 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, bennett said:

 

Nah, Michael Stewart has basically dismissed him as an idiot who knows heehaw about fitba.....

 

 

@mstewart_23
·
39m

Dermot Gallaghers analysis of the Dallas penalty incidents is lacking any real insight and makes incorrect assertions. It simply doesn’t stand any scrutiny

 

How the f**k does Stewart still have a job on the BBC. Utterly clueless 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BobWilliamson said:

Ok if there is an Anti Celtic / Pro Rangers bias why have Rangers had less penalties , the most Red cards in the whole league and close to double the number of bookings?

 

Because it should have been many more but you still have a team of hatchet men?

Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Drew Brees said:


Contact was outside, candeias dived inside. Not a pen in my, and most people’s, opinion.

In your biased opinion it’s not a penalty. 

In the opinion of most non biased people who know the LAWS of the game it is a penalty

Andrew Dallas and the stand side linesman have been vilified due to our lack of understanding of the LAWS of the game.

After hearing the LAWS of the game I now know 3 of the 4 were penalties and one is contentious. Then you have the absolute stick on penalty Rangers didn’t get

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...