Jump to content

UEFA Champions League 2019-20


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, G_Man1985 said:

Is anyone debating this ?
A stonewaller.

A load of folk on Twitter. Sure somebody on the last page said he was on his way down before contact. 

A great result for City away from home. Who is likely to replace Ramos?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Dele said:

Is there really any debate over City's penalty? 

It's as clear a penalty as you'll see. I reckon folk are only saying it wasn't because 1) It's Raheem Sterling and 2) It's an English side. 

I wouldn't say it's as clear a penalty you'll see, he is definitely on his way down and the ball is heading out of play.  In saying that it's still a penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

City were excellent tonight and outplayed Real in spells.

Hard to believe some of the sour grapes on here mentioning how shite RM were rather than how good City were.

Issue for City if they want to win it is that central defence but they have plenty about them going forward to compensate.,,,,

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, roman_bairn said:

City were excellent tonight and outplayed Real in spells.

Hard to believe some of the sour grapes on here mentioning how shite RM were rather than how good City were.

Issue for City if they want to win it is that central defence but they have plenty about them going forward to compensate.,,,,

 

If they win it, they’ll need to make sure they hand it back and not hide it in a cupboard for two years hoping no-one will notice.

Edited by pozbaird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they win it, they’ll need to make sure they hand it back and not hide it in a cupboard for two years hoping no-one will notice.

I rather suspect that CAS will suspend the ban pending an outcome which will be many years away.
If City are at fault for breaching FFP, do you really think the majority of other top clubs in the competition are innocent parties that are somehow being hard done by?…
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I rather suspect that CAS will suspend the ban pending an outcome which will be many years away.
If City are at fault for breaching FFP, do you really think the majority of other top clubs in the competition are innocent parties that are somehow being hard done by?…
"Other people did it, wah wah wah" isn't a defence for breaking the rules.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, roman_bairn said:


I rather suspect that CAS will suspend the ban pending an outcome which will be many years away.
If City are at fault for breaching FFP, do you really think the majority of other top clubs in the competition are innocent parties that are somehow being hard done by?…

UEFA about to conclude their investigation into Budvar being shafted by Central Demolition on Falkirk’s shirts.... once they clear that up, they can move onto PSG, Real Madrid....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something which they haven't done, which is why several clubs have already been punished by them in previous seasons for breaching Financial Fair Play.

As has already been stated by City, some of the financial decisions taken were done in consultation with UEFA. How therefore can they be accused of rule breaking? City feel strongly enough to launch a robust defence.

Let’s see what happens.....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has already been stated by City, some of the financial decisions taken were done in consultation with UEFA. How therefore can they be accused of rule breaking? City feel strongly enough to launch a robust defence.Let’s see what happens.....
 
 
They were already found guilty of breaking FFP regulations and had a cap on their European Squad. So they have broken the rules. The new ban is more to do with their lack of transparency than for the original breach. Some people have made the analogy of speeding - if you get caught you get 3 points and a fine. If you lie about not being the driver and are caught you face jail time. City are in the second group having already being found guilty of the first. Like they were caught speeding in a 30, paid the fine claiming they were doing 40 but they were actually doing 90.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rather suspect that CAS will suspend the ban pending an outcome which will be many years away.

If City are at fault for breaching FFP, do you really think the majority of other top clubs in the competition are innocent parties that are somehow being hard done by?…

 

 

There are only two state owned clubs in the competition

 

So the others are obviously innocent with respect to this particular kind of thing

 

And PSG and City have had 6 years to get things in order since their initial bans

 

Even if UEFA collar Spurs (for example) for an infringement tomorrow they would have to f**k about till 2026 before it escalated to this level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...