Jump to content

General Election 2019 - AND IT’S LIVE!


Frank Grimes

X in the box for   

467 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Im_Rodger said:

Based on the odds I've seen from Paddy Power greater than 7 seats will be a good night on December the 12th.

0-2 Seats = VERY Bad Night.

3-6 Seats = Bad Night

7 Seats = Boring Night

8-9 Seats = Okay Night

10-13 Seats = Good Night

14+ Seats = Glorious Night.

14 seats..... glorious 😂

Is that the bench mark for Scotland not wanting anymore referendums? Or will 0-2 seats do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said:

For anyone that thinks Channel 4 news is biased as opposed to the best at asking questions, the Keir Starmer battering a few minutes ago should be essential viewing.

I'm well impressed by the way Labour spokespeople are standing up to hard questioning, supposedly defending a Stalinist agenda. A woman was forensically examined by Andrew Neil yesterday about Labour's spending plans and how they would raise the money, and she was brilliant, under serious pressure. The Tories just fold under "So is that double counting, cash or real terms, 6 hospital refurbishments or 40 new hospitals?". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the odds I've seen from Paddy Power greater than 7 seats will be a good night on December the 12th.
0-2 Seats = VERY Bad Night.
3-6 Seats = Bad Night
7 Seats = Boring Night
8-9 Seats = Okay Night
10-13 Seats = Good Night
14+ Seats = Glorious Night.
Lucky to get 6 seats imo.

My prediction is
SNP 50
Labour 1
Lib Dems 4
Cons 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

I'm well impressed by the way Labour spokespeople are standing up to hard questioning, supposedly defending a Stalinist agenda. A woman was forensically examined by Andrew Neil yesterday about Labour's spending plans and how they would raise the money, and she was brilliant, under serious pressure. The Tories just fold under "So is that double counting, cash or real terms, 6 hospital refurbishments or 40 new hospitals?". 

The fact that the Tories never bother turning fucking up to C4 News should be a massive red light to the entire country.

They might get asked a variable of that very Weegie question "Aye, but how?", which is something those absolute c***s are obviously very uncomfortable with. The other UK news establishments tend to move onto the next question, no matter what pish they've just heard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the odds I've seen from Paddy Power greater than 7 seats will be a good night on December the 12th.
0-2 Seats = VERY Bad Night.
3-6 Seats = Bad Night
7 Seats = Boring Night
8-9 Seats = Okay Night
10-13 Seats = Good Night
14+ Seats = Glorious Night.

Read your previous paddy power post too. They are - perfectly fairly - a profit making company. They play to their market. Money in, recycle out on a margin.

Much like in here, nationalism is vocal, unionism is quiet.

Labour are now an irrelevance in Scotland (thanks Alec/Ed).

Lib Dem’s more relevant now as the Remain/No vote but not enough to make any real difference.

SNP is SNP, natch.

Tories are Union (55% at last count) and Leave (33% at last count). They are net gains in the current environment.

TL;DR? I’d be surprised if Tories lost seats.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, alta-pete said:


TL;DR? I’d be surprised if Tories lost seats.

http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/battleground/targets/snp

Stirling needs a 0.15% swing. 

Labours Gordon candidate has been humped (though not discussed on here) so that will be an SNP walkover. The SNP have about 8  Tory seats within 5%, that can be made up mostly from Lab> SNP switches. I would put real serious money behind the SNP picking seats off Lab and Con, not on emotion, just on a desire to have more money at the end of it. 

The Conservatives big chances are in the midlands. Scotland will be something of a blood bath. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Blackford got 15000ish votes vs about 21000 for liblabcon in 2017 and the Tories aren't fielding a candidate this time.

If turnout is high he might cling on, if it's low he'll probably lose the seat

Think there’s also a swing back to a more Presbyterian low key representation in the area. Think Mr Blackford is maybe a bit too high profile for his constituents.

Only an opinion of a Rangers fan on the internet. But 4/1 against? Ooft.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MixuFixit said:


Blackford got 15000ish votes vs about 21000 for liblabcon in 2017 and the Tories aren't fielding a candidate this time.

If turnout is high he might cling on, if it's low he'll probably lose the seat

Where are you seeing they’re not standing a candidate? I know of the ‘unionist pact’ but that doesn’t necessarily mean they won’t stand.  Locally they are saying they still plan on fielding someone but with the cut-off being next week you may well be correct.
 

Fwiw local canvassing result’s have been very good for the SNP.

Edited by Londonwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lib Dem candidate Craig Harrow looks OFTW. Here he is on the left.

Craig_Harrow_3.jpg?1547227838

Sounds like they'll play the Charles Kennedy card to the hilt.

Quote

The unpleasantness around Charles Kennedy’s last general election campaign has been widely reported and commented upon.  It caused much upset and anxiety with many of Charles’ friends and supporters.  

“I am determined to win the parliamentary seat back from the SNP in a way that Charles would be proud of. We need an uplifting, positive campaign for the Highlands and Islands. 

http://www.scotlibdems.org.uk/scot_lib_dems_unveil_craig_harrow_as_candidate_for_ross_skye_and_lochaber

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, alta-pete said:


Think there’s also a swing back to a more Presbyterian low key representation in the area. Think Mr Blackford is maybe a bit too high profile for his constituents.

Only an opinion of a Rangers fan on the internet. But 4/1 against? Ooft.

Maybe I'm being whooshed but they voted for Charles Kennedy for over 30 years and he was more high profile than Blackford for the majority of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm being whooshed but they voted for Charles Kennedy for over 30 years and he was more high profile than Blackford for the majority of that.

Again, only a dafty’s view from the internet but I thought Kennedy was more of a conscientious opinion on the establishment. Blackford is currently about the highest profile disruptor within the establishment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, alta-pete said:


Again, only a dafty’s view from the internet but I thought Kennedy was more of a conscientious opinion on the establishment. Blackford is currently about the highest profile disruptor within the establishment.

Fair enough. I know the area well and would be surprised to see Blackford go but do see the thought process that it could be tight (if there’s no Tory candidate). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...