Jump to content

General Election 2019 - AND IT’S LIVE!


Frank Grimes

X in the box for   

467 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Detournement said:

It's not 60 billion in one year...

It doesn't really matter whether it's in one year or not though, if it blows a big enough hole in the budget to cause problems elsewhere in budgetary terms. Looking forward to seeing what Andrew Neil does to Jo Swinson and Boris Johnson. The SNP and Labour may have lucked out by going first, because the last of these interviews will be the most fresh in the memory on election day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SweeperDee said:

If that doesn’t f**k the Tories, nothing sadly will, any case I’ll be fucking right off if they begin to dismantle the Scottish NHS.

They won't. What they'll do is dismantle the English NHS, thus dismantling the funding through the block grant for the Scottish NHS, making it look like the Scottish Government are to blame for it up here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think Corbyn missed a trick last night for sure. A simple non-apology apology would have went a long way to nipping it in the bud (something like "I personally and we had a party are against all discrimination and hate speech, whether it is racism, antisemitism or Islamophobia - that is why we have instigated procedures to weed out this behaviour in the party and we will continue to investigate throughly any complaints that are made. Where party members have been found to have behaved inappropriately, they have been removed from the Labour Party, unlike some other parties which continue to support members who have made discriminatory comments in the past. We apologise any offense that may have been caused and hope that these measures ensure everyone, regardless of creed, colour, religion or political belief realises that the Labour Party..." you get the picture. Doesn't admit to any personal antisemitism (which I don't believe anyway), talks up what they have done and pivots to the Tories and their racism and Islamophobia. Andrew Neil might not have allowed such an answer right enough, but he could have released that as a statement or in the follow up presser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Media already appear to have a handle on the narrative for these documents. Pharma companies in the US want access to our NHS but nothing in the document showing that the UK Government has agreed/discussed this.

We'll see what emerges over the next few hours as journalists study the detail but this has the potential to spectacularly backfire on Corbyn if what he's saying isn't shown in the documents. Could be a massve day either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's literally no combination of words that he could have said that would have resolved the antisemitism accusations because they're made in bad faith by people who want rid of him full stop.


You had Jim Murphy attempting to block a Jewish woman’s candidacy from the NEC on the grounds of anti-semitism and multiple days coverage of Jeremy Corbyn meeting the wrong group of Jews and people still think there’s any way for him to resolve this to anyone’s satisfaction short of quitting as leader and forcibly removing the membership of everyone who joined post-2015.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They obviously decided to refuse to agree with anything Neil put to them.

I expect if he had apologised Neil would have became more aggressive and used the apology as an admission of guilt on other accusations. And the media as a whole would have followed suit. 

It's smart not to play their game. Sadly two years too late. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Media already appear to have a handle on the narrative for these documents. Pharma companies in the US want access to our NHS but nothing in the document showing that the UK Government has agreed/discussed this.
We'll see what emerges over the next few hours as journalists study the detail but this has the potential to spectacularly backfire on Corbyn if what he's saying isn't shown in the documents. Could be a massve day either way.

Its already out in the open, the US congress have already said after being lobbied by big pharma for higher drug prices, that they will refuse to ratify any US/UK trade deal without the NHS being included. Its not a secret, I’ve posted several clear indicators of it recently, including direct confirmation from the lead US congressman on the side of the pharma companies.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:


Its already out in the open, the US congress have already said after being lobbied by big pharma for higher drug prices, that they will refuse to ratify any US/UK trade deal without the NHS being included. Its not a secret, I’ve posted several clear indicators of it recently, including direct confirmation from the lead US congressman on the side of the pharma companies.

The same applies to hormone and antibiotic stuffed and chlorinated meat. They call it pork barrel politics in Congress for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:


Its already out in the open, the US congress have already said after being lobbied by big pharma for higher drug prices, that they will refuse to ratify any US/UK trade deal without the NHS being included. Its not a secret, I’ve posted several clear indicators of it recently, including direct confirmation from the lead US congressman on the side of the pharma companies.

I'm not disagreeing with you. Just look at how journalists are already framing the argument though. Corbyn has made some ballsy claims in his press conference. If anything he's saying is exaggerated or not strictly true, the media will focus on that and not the real story and the vast majority of the pubic will just follow that line. 

As I say, this will now be a big day in this campaign. Something as scandalous as this being put out there by the main opposition will likely make or break the whole election for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



 
‘Why would the UK agree to pay more for drugs?!’ asks Laura, innocently.
 
Well why would the US agree to make them cheaper? They’re not going to stay the same price for-fucking-ever, are they?
 
It’s called a negotiation. The Prime Minister has denied the NHS is involved in trade talks, Corbyn has proven (to a degree) that it is.
 
She’s a fucking cretin.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...