Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, WATTOO said:

 

This is SO 1970's package holiday !!

I honestly don't know anyone who only goes "1 week / 2 weeks in the summer to Lanzarote" etc.

However I do know LOTS of people who travel abroad regularly (some are every 3 or 4 weeks), short breaks to Eastern Europe, Golfing Holidays to Spain / Portugal / Turkey etc, I know lots of the older generation who go long stays for 6 - 8 weeks in the winter to the Algarve / Canaries / Costa Del Sol / Malta / Cyprus etc, so i think you'll see that it runs just a tad deeper that "a week in Benidorm".

So does the fact that some people can afford multiple holidays a year (probably less than 10% of the general population) mean they should be able to go where and when they want? 

Some retirees who want to spend the winter in the sun for months on end probably have a very comfortable life at home anyway through lockdown so cry me a river. The general point still stands. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, G51 said:

Having the right to practice your faith freely without obstruction is a significant part of the foundation of a free society. It's important that this resumes as quickly as possible.

If business owners are struggling, then that's an issue with the government's financial supports.

No one is stopping anyone practicing faith freely, there has been no ban on religion or religious festivals either.   In fact, many religions have adapted well, providing online services and hopefully, when the weather improves, outdoor services.  

You mentioned a free society.  Is it right, fair, or free, that business are forced into closures as a result of government legislation?  We aren't living in a free society right now, and places of worship need to wait their turn.  They won't help the economy bounce back which is, at this moment in time, far more important than communal prayers or services. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Burnieman said:

Understand what secular means.  Noboody is stopping religious worship.

People's jobs are far far far more important to society than opening places of worship.

Definition of secular: not connected with religious or spiritual matters. So it stands - Scotland is a country with many faiths and a significant number of secular people.

These restrictions are stopping religious worship - that is the point of them. Yes you can pray in your house in some religions, you can't for others. So these restrictions are having a significant, discriminatory impact on people of certain faiths. This must be rectified as quickly as possible.

This effectively comes down to what kind of society we want to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definition of secular: not connected with religious or spiritual matters. So it stands - Scotland is a country with many faiths and a significant number of secular people.
These restrictions are stopping religious worship - that is the point of them. Yes you can pray in your house in some religions, you can't for others. So these restrictions are having a significant, discriminatory impact on people of certain faiths. This must be rectified as quickly as possible.
This effectively comes down to what kind of society we want to be.
Secular means religion plays no part in Govt. The State is seperate from the Church.

So as a secular society, religion should not influence Govt decision making or hold any form of priority in such circumstances.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this mean that even with the vaccine rollout complete and nobody going into hospital, that if case rates exceed 100 per 100,000 in future that the state can intervene to shut society down by diktat?
It needs clarified, otherwise when does that madness ever stop?
The "state" can intervene at 1 per 100k if they so choose if approved via parliament.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Places of worship being given any sort of preference is rage-inducing. Pray in the bloody house FFS. 
Schools are expected, but really there needs to be a plan to vaccinate at least secondary school kids. Schools will have the distinction of being the only non-vaccinated setting by August and therefore are basically going to keep the virus in circulation. Perhaps school kids aren't impacted in the same way as some are, but given what we keep hearing about spread of the virus and can't be sure vaccines stop that, schools risk pulling us all down. Not to mention the famous quote that R can't be kept below 1 thanks to the "more infectious Kent variant". 
There us no vaccine licensed for use in U16s. They are starting twice weekly testing using home tests from 1 March in South Ayrshire to permit the return of the S4-6 pupils doing practical work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, super_carson said:

No one is stopping anyone practicing faith freely, there has been no ban on religion or religious festivals either.   In fact, many religions have adapted well, providing online services and hopefully, when the weather improves, outdoor services.  

You mentioned a free society.  Is it right, fair, or free, that business are forced into closures as a result of government legislation?  We aren't living in a free society right now, and places of worship need to wait their turn.  They won't help the economy bounce back which is, at this moment in time, far more important than communal prayers or services. 

 

These restrictions absolutely prevent people from practicing faith freely. Aside from all Christian festivals that we're aware of, prayers for Ramadan, Eid, Passover and many more were cancelled.

On top of that, religious buildings often provide vital support for the poorest and most vulnerable in society. Lots of people who benefit from this support aren't necessarily eligible for government support, for a wide range of fairly obvious reasons.

Is it right that businesses are forced into closure? No. And we will re-open them. But in the order of prioritization, non-essential businesses have to come behind religious places of worship. If it doesn't, we risk becoming a society that discriminates against minority religions in particular.

The economy is not a justification for re-opening businesses. Especially when you consider that the economy is little more than the moral teachings of Adam Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billy Jean King said:
29 minutes ago, Michael W said:
Places of worship being given any sort of preference is rage-inducing. Pray in the bloody house FFS. 
Schools are expected, but really there needs to be a plan to vaccinate at least secondary school kids. Schools will have the distinction of being the only non-vaccinated setting by August and therefore are basically going to keep the virus in circulation. Perhaps school kids aren't impacted in the same way as some are, but given what we keep hearing about spread of the virus and can't be sure vaccines stop that, schools risk pulling us all down. Not to mention the famous quote that R can't be kept below 1 thanks to the "more infectious Kent variant". 

There us no vaccine licensed for use in U16s. They are starting twice weekly testing using home tests from 1 March in South Ayrshire to permit the return of the S4-6 pupils doing practical work.

Seems like something we can achieve in due course though. U16s already receive a number of vaccinations presently so no reason we can't get a vaccine licensed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Burnieman said:

Secular means religion plays no part in Govt. The State is seperate from the Church.

So as a secular society, religion should not influence Govt decision making or hold any form of priority in such circumstances.

That is not what secular means. There is nothing in the definition about separation of church and state.

Religion should not influence government decision, but that is not relevant to the question being asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But religion is, to be quite blunt, not real.

We shouldn't be bending over backwards to prioritise and appease people who live their lives based on what a fictional character says.

Edited by Todd_is_God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jan Vojáček said:

A tremendous number of jabs and a positivity rate under 5 percent.

I'm away to book two weeks in Cape Town for the start of May.

May i recommend staying down by the V and A waterfront 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must admit, I've been pretty pro Gov throughout this and thought erring on the side of caution was the way to go to try and stop as many deaths / serious illness as possible, however I've now got to the completely cheesed off point as there now seems no way out of this ??
We have the vaccines that they all heralded, we have all the new drugs and treatments that they said would stop lots of the fatalities, we've got a much better understanding of dealing with the virus, we've had major restrictions for months (approaching a full year) and yet over the past few days the rhetoric coming from all Governments appears to be that it's pointless, it's all been in vain and these restrictions will NEED to continue indefinitely !!
Why ?? I thought it was about stopping deaths and serious illness, so have we not achieved that ?? Either the vaccine works or it doesn't surely ????
So, is this it ? is this life forever more ??, is this all we have to live for ???
The fact people are actually defending the banning of holidays just shows how screwed up / subservient our population has become, well, I'm sorry, but this simply can't go on indefinitely, another way out is needed and needed fast, before we all go bloody insane !!!
This ^^^ If the vaccines have been approved too early and aren't as effective than needed to open back up just admit that as that's what it's beginning to sound like. However we know there will be no admission of error never mind guilt from Johnson and co.

The great British summer was the rhetoric just 2 weeks ago, what has changed or is it just more populist soundbites ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, G51 said:

That is not what secular means. There is nothing in the definition about separation of church and state.

Religion should not influence government decision, but that is not relevant to the question being asked.

a secular society is exactly that where the church has no influence over government policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...