Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Elixir said:

I can only remember the media and reaction here being one of shock at what was happening in Wuhan, particularly your sanctimonious rags like The Guardian - about how it was an affront to human rights and democracy.

Now of course, these same rags are all for these very same measures as the sanctimony stakes have moved from human rights and democracy to making sure it looks like you care about death and illness prevention more than anyone or anything else.

Was it also in people with HIV?

Our measures aren't remotely similar to Wuhans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, super_carson said:

The biggest criticism I have is the risk it poses to the vaccine rollout and it plays into the hands of the anti-vax brigade. For an advisor to the Scottish government, that's a massive, massive mistake. To then double down on it and play the victim when she was called out, respectfully, by another who was far more qualified to discuss the data from that survey was pretty poor.

Of course we don't know how much NS actually listens to her, but surely after this there will need to be some distancing from her.

She should have distanced from her about 10 months ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching BBC Hardtalk from the other night .  Jean-Claude Juncker is being interviewed.

Saying the EU Commission failure to procure vaccines is because they are so budget conscious and the rollout failure is nothing to do with the Commission and entirely down to member states own failings.

Proper lunatic stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said:

Devi Sridhar having a heads gone is a delicious development.

It's beautiful, the passive aggressive follow up tweet claiming she was being destroyed was glorious.

It'll be brushed under the carpet though - the Spectactor did a piece on her pish and subsequent blocking the vaccine expert, but that'll be scoffed at as "right wing propaganda" on the basis that people who have the cheek to question her aren't talking it seriously and think the whole thing is a hoax, or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Left Back said:

Watching BBC Hardtalk from the other night .  Jean-Claude Juncker is being interviewed.

Saying the EU Commission failure to procure vaccines is because they are so budget conscious and the rollout failure is nothing to do with the Commission and entirely down to member states own failings.

Proper lunatic stuff.

Leave a light on for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, anotherchance said:

It's beautiful, the passive aggressive follow up tweet claiming she was being destroyed was glorious.

It'll be brushed under the carpet though - the Spectactor did a piece on her pish and subsequent blocking the vaccine expert, but that'll be scoffed at as "right wing propaganda" on the basis that people who have the cheek to question her aren't talking it seriously and think the whole thing is a hoax, or something.

It shouldn't be brushed under the carpet though. Her pish is (checks notes) pish and reasonable journalists would be calling it out more often if their owners weren't more interested in click bait nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michael W said:

It's worse than that - she has made a false statement. Why she has done this is known only by Devi herself, but seems to me that she has done this to back up the case for her longstanding bemoaning of travel. 

The effects of this are worse: what message are people going to hear, here? "the AZ vaccine doesn't work". That's what they'll hear and her remarks will encourage the anti-vaxxers. 

She needs to he shown the door for this, both for her below par professional conduct and also because of the message she's sent with it. She is "only an advisor" after all, and they're about as disposable as you can get in politics. 

Par for the course with her.

She blocked me months ago for pointing out that, contrary to her rant about him being outrageously selfish, the German guy that went to a party 72 hours after a voluntary border test had done so because he'd been told he'd be notified within 24 hours if he'd testive positive.

Devi really doesn't like her narrative being swatted away by pesky things like actual facts.

Edited by Todd_is_God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Detournement said:

We now have a "National Health Security Service" who are presumably going to police compliance to the passport restrictions.

Not at all sinister. 

I wonder if it was originally called National Safety and Prevention (Diseases) - Security Service until someone pointed out the acronym was NSAPD-SS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, tamthebam said:

I wonder if it was originally called National Safety and Prevention (Diseases) - Security Service until someone pointed out the acronym was NSAPD-SS?

If the angle you are going for is NSDAP then that doesn't really work...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...