Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

Quote

Ross Greer's political career arguable started at the age of 14. That was when he “led a coup” against the sixth years at Bearsden Academy to take control of the eco committee, after the older pupils repeatedly failed to turn up to meetings.

https://www.holyrood.com/inside-politics/view,impatient-for-change-interview-with-ross-greer-msp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Elixir said:

Sorry for pre-empting Tynierose, but I'd believe the short answer is no. We now already know the base of how these vaccines work and respond in humans, so it should 'just be the case' of re-formulating them. When it's decided what strains to put into the influenza vaccine each year, it doesn't go through fully blown clinical trials as we already know how it works, and there's of course the urgency of it being ready for autumn.

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have pointed out already, using cases as the driving metric is bullshit, and then inference of your post was that if we cant loosen because cases are high, that's the fault of the vaccine, when instead we should be acknowleding that case numbers are becoming irrelevant precisely because the vaccine is wildly exceeding its stated aims
Nope no idea where you got that take on it !

I 100% acknowledge the vaccine is reducing cases. I was merely pointing out that based purely on the figs in the puff piece the BBC regurgitated IF (and again in plain English I don't think it should be for the avoidance of doubt) we were to base levels on caseload then the figures quoted should be easily met. That was the one and only point I was making. We should have nowhere above L2 come the end of April based on that table. No need to read anything into it that simply wasn't there.

If we are not at those rates before anything is opened up then as I said before something will have changed as all the indications right now are that we will be.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, super_carson said:

No, I know. But my point was more it’s not medical per se. I think a few folk have pointed out that the most prominent advisors aren’t those qualified in virology or epidemiology.  Perhaps allowing my frustration to get in the way of the point I’m trying to make. 

ETA: it’s not that I think her contributions are worthless, clearly she is qualified and her opinion is worth listening to.  But I don’t think it should be taken as gospel, and should be weighed up against the opinions of virologists, epidemiologists, economists, socialists, etc. I just feel that, mostly due to MSM, the debate and range of opinions presented have become skewed. It isn’t great when such a big issue like the pandemic appears to be being influenced by a narrow field of experts.

Nice try, but you clearly now know you f**ked up by thinking she literally had a Doctorate in Philosophy.

Your original post negatively emphasised the word "Philosophy"; if you really were calling into question her credentials relative to the virologists and epidemiologists you speak of (the vast majority of whom will also hold Doctorates of Philosophy), you would have highlighted her actual areas of expertise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billy Jean King said:

Nope no idea where you got that take on it !

I 100% acknowledge the vaccine is reducing cases. I was merely pointing out that based purely on the figs in the puff piece the BBC regurgitated IF (and again in plain English I don't think it should be for the avoidance of doubt) we were to base levels on caseload then the figures quoted should be easily met. That was the one and only point I was making. We should have nowhere above L2 come the end of April based on that table. No need to read anything into it that simply wasn't there.

If we are not at those rates before anything is opened up then as I said before something will have changed as all the indications right now are that we will be.

You’ve done this on several occasions in this thread, so it’s not a surprise to see it again, but the above is essentially saying you disagree with what has been implied will be the ScotGov method of loosening/tightening restrictions, but simultaneously refusing to criticise it in any way.

Strange stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Master said:

Nice try, but you clearly now know you f**ked up by thinking she literally had a Doctorate in Philosophy.

Your original post negatively emphasised the word "Philosophy"; if you really were calling into question her credentials relative to the virologists and epidemiologists you speak of (the vast majority of whom will also hold Doctorates of Philosophy), you would have highlighted her actual areas of expertise.

I didn't think she had a doctorate in philosophy, as I did at least have a look at what her specialism was in (anthropology etc.)  Granted, worded it like a petulant fanny and will take that on the chin. 

Edited by super_carson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You’ve done this on several occasions in this thread, so it’s not a surprise to see it again, but the above is essentially saying you disagree with what has been implied will be the ScotGov method of loosening/tightening restrictions, but simultaneously refusing to criticise it in any way.
Strange stuff.
Sorry if I'm not coming across as Cunty enough in my level of disagreement to satisfy your standards.

I won't be amending my form of disagreement to satisfy you or anyone else. Simple solution, Don't read my responses if I don't come up to your exacting standards !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Bairnardo said:
52 minutes ago, craigkillie said:
I would hope it would at least make them think twice about imposing similar restrictions.

The govt up here has taken the tone of using restrictions as some sort of nationwide naughty step already, and we have seen (didnt you write to the greens over this btw, did you ever get a reply?) Ross Greer showing utter contempt towards football fans as it pertains to restrictions, so I'd have little faith in this summer being different in terms of that sort of tone.

I haven't had anything back yet, going to follow up in a couple of days and will basically continue doing so until I hear something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ross Greer's political career arguable started at the age of 14. That was when he “led a coup” against the sixth years at Bearsden Academy to take control of the eco committee, after the older pupils repeatedly failed to turn up to meetings.
https://www.holyrood.com/inside-politics/view,impatient-for-change-interview-with-ross-greer-msp
He must have been bullied in school. If he wasn't, he deserved to be.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, ICTChris said:

 


If he’s the one I’m thinking of, Ross Greer gives off a very heavy vibe of being in politics to spite the people who were mean to him at school. This proposal makes sense when viewed through this prism.

It’s worth saying that this isn’t about him being a Green - the ‘I hate daddy’ pattern is present across political parties. It can be a positive thing as well although it’s more often negative.

 

My mum knows his dad and he definitely gets some of his pomposity from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bob Mahelp
5 minutes ago, Bob Mahelp said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-56237471

Absolutely no good news here. When we eventually get to the level system in 7 weeks, criteria will be much stricter than last year. 

As it stands at the moment, very few areas will be moving down to level 2.

(Apologies if this was posted already).

 

I hate quoting myself, but I'm just reading further through the article.

'The strategic framework document says that weekly case rates and percentage of positive tests will remain core indicators when deciding which level a local authority is placed in'.

So not hospitalisation, ICU admittance or deaths then. Case rates.

f**k me.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bob Mahelp
2 minutes ago, The Moonster said:

Honestly, that's fucking depressing as shit. The Scottish Government have lost all sight of why restrictions are required. We've got a fucking vaccine and we're implementing tighter restrictions. Lost the fucking plot. 

I also don't see how this is feasible when England is going in a completely different direction. 

Let's see how people in Scotland react when England has virtually no restrictions and is allowing foreign travel, and half of Scotland is still locked down in Level 3 because we have 51 cases per 100K and virtually no deaths. 

This is verging on insanity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm desperately trying to give myself some hope that they're just being cautious and waiting to find out what a rip-roaring c**t the tousled-hair w****r makes down south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like furlough is going to be extended again, though nothing said about duration. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56247455

Probably going to be needed since the levels and tiers are going to take a massive shit on the hospitality and leisure sectors. 

The good feeling of the last week has evaporated for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...