ropy Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 2 hours ago, Theroadlesstravelled said: The season should be cancelled like better leagues have done but too many diddy Premiership clubs are willing to take the Celtic boaby and let them get 9 in a row. To be fair it was Rangers who let Celtic get 9 in a row by not coming back from their holidays. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted May 12, 2020 Author Share Posted May 12, 2020 You can almost taste the tears in this post, absolutely delicious.. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flood Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) So... Sevco wanted charges brought against the SPFL into “corruption at the highest Level” requiring suspension of 2 staff at the SPFL following the original vote. They then back tracked a fair bit, to “lack of fair play in the voting process”. They then produced a 200 page “Dossier” that would blow Scottish football apart and how many clubs backed them....evidence on bullying blown apart by Brechin and Morton statements... i can identify 8 supporters and their motives. Others can fill out.. Club 1. Sevco. Motive . Void the league. Stop title award to celtic 9IAR. (But we want money for second place) Throw an asterisk in etc club 2. Hearts . Motive . Stop relegation. Club 3. Aberdeen Motive. Trolling sheep fans club 4. Livingston Motive. No idea. Possibly trolling or supporting Hearts and their maroon pound. club 5. ICT. Motive. Void leagues, get reconstruction and get into 14 team top league. sevco fan as ceo club 6. Partick Thistle. Motive. Stop relegation club 7. Stranraer. Motive stop relegation. club 8 . Stenhousemuir. Motive orange lodge Handshake So 3 of their supporters are being relegated and would support ANY proposal to avoid that. Fair enough.I would do same. 2 have dubious rangers/orange lodge links i see you Scot Gardiner and Stenny... 1 is sevco 2 are probably trolling who are clubs 9 to 13. ? so 6 clubs (Aberdeen, Livingston and 4 others ) with no significant interest in relegation or orange influence have read the 200 page “dossier” and voted in support. Hardly a victory ... Edited May 12, 2020 by flood 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukDukGoose Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 25 minutes ago, flood said: So... Sevco wanted charges brought against the SPFL into “corruption at the highest Level” requiring suspension of 2 staff at the SPFL following the original vote. They then back tracked a fair bit, to “lack of fair play in the voting process”. They then produced a 200 page “Dossier” that would blow Scottish football apart and how many clubs backed them....evidence on bullying blown apart by Brechin and Morton statements... i can identify 8 supporters and their motives. Others can fill out.. Club 1. Sevco. Motive . Void the league. Stop title award to celtic 9IAR. (But we want money for second place) Throw an asterisk in etc club 2. Hearts . Motive . Stop relegation. Club 3. Aberdeen Motive. Trolling sheep fans club 4. Livingston Motive. No idea. Possibly trolling or supporting Hearts and their maroon pound. club 5. ICT. Motive. Void leagues, get reconstruction and get into 14 team top league. sevco fan as ceo club 6. Partick Thistle. Motive. Stop relegation club 7. Stranraer. Motive stop relegation. club 8 . Stenhousemuir. Motive orange lodge Handshake So 3 of their supporters are being relegated and would support ANY proposal to avoid that. Fair enough.I would do same. 2 have dubious rangers/orange lodge links i see you Scot Gardiner and Stenny... 1 is sevco 2 are probably trolling who are clubs 9 to 13. ? so 6 clubs (Aberdeen, Livingston and 4 others ) with no significant interest in relegation or orange influence have read the 200 page “dossier” and voted in support. Hardly a victory ... I wouldn't say we've read the dossier and given our support. Cormack said he thinks there should be an investigation weeks ago. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flood Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 19 minutes ago, Merkland Red said: I wouldn't say we've read the dossier and given our support. Cormack said he thinks there should be an investigation weeks ago. If only Milne hadn’t cosied up with Celtic back in 2012, things may have been different.... You jumped into bed with Celtic and kept the 11-1 voting thinking you were billy big balls with sevco at the bottom 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 50 minutes ago, flood said: So... Sevco wanted charges brought against the SPFL We didn't. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flood Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: We didn't. What did sevco want then? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukDukGoose Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 9 minutes ago, flood said: If only Milne hadn’t cosied up with Celtic back in 2012, things may have been different.... You jumped into bed with Celtic and kept the 11-1 voting thinking you were billy big balls with sevco at the bottom Or perhaps Milne wanted to prevent another Setanta situation? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 Imagine the end of year revue for the Ibrox PR machine, statements and dossiers produced = hunners, effect = fuckall. Aye, just keep up the good work lads, you've got a job for life. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, flood said: What did sevco want then? For the entire voting farrago of Good Friday to be the subject to an independent review - as any sane person would have wanted. Very different to your idiotic, "wanted charges brought against the SPFL" shite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flood Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) 13 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: For the entire voting farrago of Good Friday to be the subject to an independent review - as any sane person would have wanted. Very different to your idiotic, "wanted charges brought against the SPFL" shite. And 41 clubs read the “dossier” and only a few that were not getting relegated Voted with you. go back and read rangers statements. They have back tracked big time Edited May 12, 2020 by flood 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIVIFOREVER Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 1 hour ago, The_Kincardine said: For the entire voting farrago of Good Friday to be the subject to an independent review - as any sane person would have wanted. Very different to your idiotic, "wanted charges brought against the SPFL" shite. To what end, the SPFL already said they'd be willing to have talks to see where things could've been done better, and improvements made. Just after the season is dealt with, so next season can be planned. A further inquiry just now would've just added to this whole mess, making things more difficult. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaybeee Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 2 hours ago, flood said: And 41 clubs read the “dossier” and only a few that were not getting relegated Voted with you. go back and read rangers statements. They have back tracked big time I had no problem with any club (even Hearts) who argued their points to try and stave of relegation, they were simply doing the best they could to support their club.........even though some of it may have been a 'little' dodgy. However WTF have Rangers got to gripe about (yes I know 9IAR) but does that not simply show what a state that club is in , I mean if it was a horse you would shoot it. Aberdeen? god knows what they were up to, I thought Milne was a tosser; but at least he was a tosser that (generally) knew what he was doing, this new guy seems like a total numpty and likewise the new ICT man covered himself in glory.......NOT, what another tosser and a liar to boot if the other directors are to believed. Someone earlier posted a bit of common sense which roughly said NO football will be played in the land of the haggis till at least September time (I think we will be lucky if its that early) and nor should it, anyone getting ill and possibly passing the virus on to a family member which might result in even ONE fatality because FOOTBALL was being restarted to earl;y is unaceptable ................even to us fitba mad jocks..................SURELY? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 3 hours ago, jaybeee said: I had no problem with any club (even Hearts) who argued their points to try and stave of relegation, they were simply doing the best they could to support their club.........even though some of it may have been a 'little' dodgy. However WTF have Rangers got to gripe about (yes I know 9IAR) but does that not simply show what a state that club is in , I mean if it was a horse you would shoot it. Aberdeen? god knows what they were up to, I thought Milne was a tosser; but at least he was a tosser that (generally) knew what he was doing, this new guy seems like a total numpty and likewise the new ICT man covered himself in glory.......NOT, what another tosser and a liar to boot if the other directors are to believed. Someone earlier posted a bit of common sense which roughly said NO football will be played in the land of the haggis till at least September time (I think we will be lucky if its that early) and nor should it, anyone getting ill and possibly passing the virus on to a family member which might result in even ONE fatality because FOOTBALL was being restarted to earl;y is unaceptable ................even to us fitba mad jocks..................SURELY? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted May 13, 2020 Author Share Posted May 13, 2020 This guy has it cracked. If you don't count selected things, you'll get a different result that still isn't in your favour. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 21 minutes ago, Romeo said: This guy has it cracked. If you don't count selected things, you'll get a different result that still isn't in your favour. 'You're absolutely right... wrong.' 13 out of 30 is 56%?????? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted May 13, 2020 Author Share Posted May 13, 2020 'You're absolutely right... wrong.' 13 out of 30 is 56%??????Did you use a normal calculator or a staunch calculator though ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 Just now, Romeo said: 4 minutes ago, The DA said: 'You're absolutely right... wrong.' 13 out of 30 is 56%?????? Did you use a normal calculator or a staunch calculator though ? Even a Seville calculator would have trouble with that one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 On 10/05/2020 at 13:28, Sortmeout said: Mind when Oldco went into admin early just so they could appoint Duff & Phelps. Banter years thread for this 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 Don't see what the problem is, if take away every one that abstained and voted against you get a 100% for. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.