Jump to content

What are the things you hate regarding fitba?


Recommended Posts

On 16/02/2022 at 19:31, Highland Capital said:

Folk who huff and puff at short corners.  Corners hoofed into the box are wildly wildly overrated.  Folk get excited when a corner is given but they hardly ever result in a goal.

By a similar token, folk who huff and puff about the goalkeeper passing the ball out from the back.  Apparently some people like the ball hoofed up the park and lose possession.

I don't think they're over rated, they are just poorly executed more often. A player at almost any level who can't get a corner past the first defender, at the very least, needs more practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, velo army said:

Music being played after a goal. I hate it more than I hate the late offside flag (and that rips my very knitting).

Just let the crowd make noise. Having shitey music drowning out crowd celebrations is utterly fucking moronic. 

Absolutely.clearly an initiative by people who don't understand the game&it's atmosphere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/02/2022 at 18:56, Jambomo said:

People referring to “The Barclays” as in “That goal was pure Barclays” or “a only in the Barclays”.  

It’s a meaningless phrase given the variance in quality and entertainment that is actually one show between the top and bottom teams.  

There’s plenty of games that are dire in that league, so pretending it’s some amazing product is stupid. We aren’t selling it, so we can leave the eulogising to Sky Sports. 

Just calling that league "The Barclays" or even BPL is cringeworthy in the first place imo. Just call it the Premier League, PL or EPL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Marten said:

Just calling that league "The Barclays" or even BPL is cringeworthy in the first place imo. Just call it the Premier League, PL or EPL.

That league has become so corporate and sanitised that calling it "The Barclays" unironically is pretty apt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The law that says a goalkeeper can only hold on to the ball for six seconds, and if they hold on to it for seven seconds or more it’s an indirect free kick. Why is that law there? If a team is in a favourable scoreline, a keeper will not release the ball for at least twelve seconds, and I’ve seen up to twenty seconds. Why is the law there? Does ma f*ck*ng heid in.
What makes even less sense is when the keeper is booked for time wasting it almost never results in an indirect free kick.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The keeper is only ever booked for timewasting when the ball isn't in play, ie at a goal kick or free-kick.

In terms of the 6 second rule, it already achieves what it is put in place to avoid, so who cares if they actually have the ball for 7 or 8 seconds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, craigkillie said:

The keeper is only ever booked for timewasting when the ball isn't in play, ie at a goal kick or free-kick.

In terms of the 6 second rule, it already achieves what it is put in place to avoid, so who cares if they actually have the ball for 7 or 8 seconds?

If you think that a keeper in a winning side only holds on to the ball for 7 or 8 seconds, you should become as sad as me a check it out on a regular basis. It takes them 7 or 8 seconds to get off the ground once they’ve flopped there after gathering a straightforward shot or cross.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The purpose of the rule is to make sure that the goalkeeper can't just stand with the ball in his hands until the end of the game if his team is winning. It ensures that the ball has to be returned to play in a somewhat timely manner. The choice of six seconds is completely arbitrary, and any attempt to enforce that strictly wouldn't be in the spirit of the game. As you pointed out, if a goalkeeper comes and claims a cross, it can often be more than six seconds before they can get back up and have all the opposing players out of their way etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Marten said:

Just calling that league "The Barclays" or even BPL is cringeworthy in the first place imo. Just call it the Premier League, PL or EPL.

Calling it the Barclays goes back to when they were the last title sponsor of the league. It was obviously written into the deal that the competition had to be referred to as the Barclays Premier League when being mentioned in the media and it led to a laughable over use of the term, particularly by a then relevant Owen Coyle, who would shoehorn it in as often as possible no matter how ridiculous it sounded. Referring to The Barclays is really taking the piss out of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/02/2022 at 07:28, Marten said:
On 22/02/2022 at 00:25, velo army said:
That league has become so corporate and sanitised that calling it "The Barclays" unironically is pretty apt.

Fair point! I just never use sponsor names for leagues, cups or grounds.

The B&Q cup is the exception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The purpose of the rule is to make sure that the goalkeeper can't just stand with the ball in his hands until the end of the game if his team is winning. It ensures that the ball has to be returned to play in a somewhat timely manner. The choice of six seconds is completely arbitrary, and any attempt to enforce that strictly wouldn't be in the spirit of the game. As you pointed out, if a goalkeeper comes and claims a cross, it can often be more than six seconds before they can get back up and have all the opposing players out of their way etc.

A lot of them absolutely milk it tbh. I watched Everton a few weeks back and on at least two occasions Pickford held the ball for 30 seconds before kicking it.


I'd like to see the game 45 minutes a half and exactly that. Any time the ball goes out the clock is stopped. It would be simple enough to do in the top divisions with a 4th official but would probably be a bit trickier the lower you went I suppose. It would certainly eliminate time-wasting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 19QOS19 said:


A lot of them absolutely milk it tbh. I watched Everton a few weeks back and on at least two occasions Pickford held the ball for 30 seconds before kicking it.


I'd like to see the game 45 minutes a half and exactly that. Any time the ball goes out the clock is stopped. It would be simple enough to do in the top divisions with a 4th official but would probably be a bit trickier the lower you went I suppose. It would certainly eliminate time-wasting.

Are you kidding? The next game would  be due to kick off 5 minutes after the last one finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting increasingly annoyed by players now positioning the ball as far outside of the curve as is legally possible at corners. As if the ball being that bit closer to the penalty box is going to make any difference. Love it when it sails over everyone and out the other side of the box after it's very careful placement on the very edge! Other than showing how they'll play the laws to the extreme I don't see the point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...