EPL 20/21

[Ro Sham Bo]

Some miss by Henderson there. 

[senorsoupe]

1 minute ago, Ro Sham Bo said:

Some miss by Henderson there. 

Give some credit to the Fulham goalie, it was a good save

[Iminavest]

Fulham have a few decent players in this squad. Just look like they'll be well short on goals.

[senorsoupe]

1 minute ago, Iminavest said:

Fulham have a few decent players in this squad. Just look like they'll be well short on goals.

What's up with Mitrovic?  Surely he would be their best goal source

[Derry Alli]

f**k off.

[senorsoupe]

1 minute ago, Mr. Alli said:

f**k off.

Unfortunately, with the new handball laws being the ass that they are, the ref had to give that penalty

[Derry Alli]

1 hour ago, senorsoupe said:

This table would contradict the theory that Liverpool get favourable VAR decisions

https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/ranking-the-premier-league-clubs-by-who-is-most-affected-by-var-in-2020-21/

What does your table say now? 

Laughable decisions today, both go in Liverpool favour. 

[Michael W]

It's a penalty under the new handball rule. We ought not to have changed the rule, but we did because there was a nice expensive computer system that needed its expense validated. 

So, really, another win for the moaners that demanded video technology, who are now being served their dinner. 

[Michael W]

6 minutes ago, Mr. Alli said:

What does your table say now? 

Laughable decisions today, both go in Liverpool favour. 

It would appear Liverpool are still bottom on -5.

That was a penalty. I don't agree with the rule change, but it's a penalty and it was never going to be overturned by VAR. 

[Derry Alli]

Just now, Michael W said:

It would appear Liverpool are still bottom on -5.

That was a penalty. I don't agree with the rule change, but it's a penalty and it was never going to be overturned by VAR. 

It isn't a penalty. His silhouette isn't any bigger. Its an exceptionally dangerous precedent to set - especially when you see some being worse than that not being awarded. Other end of the park, that isn't given. 

Same as the penalty call first half, other end of the park - that's given. 

It's shoddy and is only really widening the gap in fairness. 

Minamino just nearly took a Fulham players face off with a high boot. Why wasn't that brought back for a free kick? 

[Derry Alli]

 

[raith_94]

Liverpool rise to 2nd place...in penalties awarded in the Premier League this season. Behind only Leicester - and with 25% more than United.

[Gus Setsniffer]

1 hour ago, senorsoupe said:

This table would contradict the theory that Liverpool get favourable VAR decisions

https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/ranking-the-premier-league-clubs-by-who-is-most-affected-by-var-in-2020-21/

all that tells me is Planet Football has Liverpool fans on their staff.

[Jambomo]

I’m fed up of them making a big deal out of the teams being in Europe. They are so fucking deal with it and stop moaning about it.

eta - I mean the commentators. Henderson wasn’t making excuses.

Edited December 13, 2020 by Jambomo

[Theroadlesstravelled]

VAR is stinking. 
Remember when VAR gave Man Utd a penalty when Fernandez stood on someone’s foot?

 

[Jim McLean's Ghost]

4 minutes ago, Theroadlesstravelled said:

VAR is stinking. 
Remember when VAR gave Man Utd a penalty when Fernandez stood on someone’s foot?

 

Man Utd player goes to plant his foot and the Villa player takes him out. Same as the one in today's Fulham vs Liverpool game.

 

[pandarilla]

It isn't a penalty. His silhouette isn't any bigger. Its an exceptionally dangerous precedent to set - especially when you see some being worse than that not being awarded. Other end of the park, that isn't given. 
Same as the penalty call first half, other end of the park - that's given. 
It's shoddy and is only really widening the gap in fairness. 
Minamino just nearly took a Fulham players face off with a high boot. Why wasn't that brought back for a free kick? 

That was a clear penalty - and it was the ref that gave it straight away.

Every week someone on here claims that var benefits one team or another. It's always bollocks.

Teams that attack more are going to get more incidents in opponents box. There's no fucking conspiracy you melts.

[Derry Alli]

3 minutes ago, pandarilla said:

That was a clear penalty - and it was the ref that gave it straight away.

VAR is there to dispute decisions after the initial call. They agreed with the referee. It's quite rightly them I'm calling out for it. 

As it is their fault for not awarding a penalty to Fulham first half. 

Edit : as for your "teams that attack more get more in opposition box, you melts", that's a crock of shite. Nobody is debating where the decisions are made, people are debating who the decisions are going for. Consistently. 

Edited December 13, 2020 by Mr. Alli

[Gus Setsniffer]

3 minutes ago, pandarilla said:

That was a clear penalty - and it was the ref that gave it straight away.

Every week someone on here claims that var benefits one team or another. It's always bollocks.

Teams that attack more are going to get more incidents in opponents box. There's no fucking conspiracy you melts.

[pandarilla]

VAR is there to dispute decisions after the initial call. They agreed with the referee. It's quite rightly them I'm calling out for it. 
As it is their fault for not awarding a penalty to Fulham first half. 
Edit : as for your "teams that attack more get more in opposition box, you melts", that's a crock of shite. Nobody is debating where the decisions are made, people are debating who the decisions are going for. Consistently. 

So who is conducting this conspiracy?