Jump to content

Rangers v2.0 v One Club since 1888


Romeo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Savage Henry said:

It really is.  Palmer and Patterson for me. 

I don't think O'Donnell is that good but he is obviously Clarke's boy. And Palmer has never shown he is actually better than O'Donnell so I think it is more likely Palmer would miss out.

But Patterson has the potential to be far better than both of them and he has been able to show it in flashes in Europe and even in the turgid U21 qualifying campaign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, San Starko Rover said:

How are this absolute gang sitting second in the Premiership, Celtic really are gash.

Most teams this season go to Celtic Park and sit on their 18 yard line and invite 25 Celtic shots on goal each game, conceding 3 or 4 usually. So Celtic end up winning 14/15 of their home games.
 

The correct tactic under Rodgers, sure, when they were actually good. If you attack this Neil Lennon/John Kennedy side they’ll fold like a deck of shite cards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Melanius Mullarkey said:

Is that Laxalt really at Milan?

As in AC Milan? 

Tbf he was signed as a left winger, then converted to a wing back, then punted out.

Quite why Celtic decided he's a left back is beyond me.

1 minute ago, Grangemouth Bairn said:

Any decent manager wouldn’t have fired up a team that are clearly better than you right before you play them.

I doubt it would matter, tbh. This Rangers side are killers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheScarf said:

Most teams this season go to Celtic Park and sit on their 18 yard line and invite 25 Celtic shots on goal each game, conceding 3 or 4 usually. So Celtic end up winning 14/15 of their home games.
 

The correct tactic under Rodgers, sure, when they were actually good. If you attack this Neil Lennon/John Kennedy side they’ll fold like a deck of shite cards. 

I wouldn't be touching the chips & dips at that card game... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheScarf said:

Most teams this season go to Celtic Park and sit on their 18 yard line and invite 25 Celtic shots on goal each game, conceding 3 or 4 usually. So Celtic end up winning 14/15 of their home games.
 

The correct tactic under Rodgers, sure, when they were actually good. If you attack this Neil Lennon/John Kennedy side they’ll fold like a deck of shite cards. 

They've got mad depth compared to the rest of us tbf.

Against us they brought on 6 Internationals worth over £15m in transfer fees, including Griffiths who completely changed the game for them. Then another game they scored when a deflected cross looped up and and dropped in the goal in the only place it wouldn't be saved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheScarf said:

Most teams this season go to Celtic Park and sit on their 18 yard line and invite 25 Celtic shots on goal each game, conceding 3 or 4 usually. So Celtic end up winning 14/15 of their home games.
 

The correct tactic under Rodgers, sure, when they were actually good. If you attack this Neil Lennon/John Kennedy side they’ll fold like a deck of shite cards. 

Yup. They can’t cope with Jordan White.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...