Jump to content

New SPFL sponsor


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Forfinn said:

I mean, it has to be though? Either that or they told Tomket Tires they wouldn't have any other sleeve sponsors, which would be daft considering having the league sponsor on your shirt sleeve is a fairly well-established tradition.

And assuming it is Parks, it's probably fair to say they're at it. Parks isn't listed as one of the club's partners or sponsors on Rangers' website, so why would they have a contract in place that conflicts with displaying cinch's logo? Not saying they don't have such a contract in place, but one might speculate the only real reason for that clause to exist is to protect the chairman's business interests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the fuck else could it be? They’re the only club who’s chairman owns a motor franchise and the only club refusing to wear the logo of another motor franchise on their jerseys.
Just a coincidence m9. The Rangers are just trying to get the best deal for the league, they really are heros.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Forfinn said:

And assuming it is Parks, it's probably fair to say they're at it. Parks isn't listed as one of the club's partners or sponsors on Rangers' website, so why would they have a contract in place that conflicts with displaying cinch's logo? Not saying they don't have such a contract in place, but one might speculate the only real reason for that clause to exist is to protect the chairman's business interests.

If, further down the line, it can be proven that Douglas Park is trying to sabotage the deal to protect his own personal business interests, there would surely be some pretty hefty legal action taken against him. You would hope so anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is only to do with some tenuous link to their directors business interests and ego, and there is no real contract in place between them , the league will probably be able to drive one of big Dougie's own 52 seaters right through their argument and force them into yet another humiliating public climbdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, TommyDickFingers said:

Don't worry lads, Charlie has a solution.🤣

 

It’s amazing- but not surprising - that current players, ex-of the Old Firm, can simultaneously support giving Rangers a direct advantage by taking away from everyone else, whilst still being employed by a direct  competitor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, when thinking of "big brain time", it's not Charlie Adam that springs to mind. That said, I am sure it's a more coherent answer than you'd get from someone like Kris Boyd.

As for Rangers/Park/Cinch cross over, I'm not entirely sure it's directly because 'Park owns motors'/'Cinch owns motors' however on the flip side I'm pretty certain that if Park can in any way 'encumber' a rival company in this process he'll see that as an added bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone actually read what Adam has said or are you all diving in with 2 feet at the Daily Record of all places?

'... the other 10 clubs have to have a say as well. They need to all get round a table and come to a decision. If that decision is Rangers and Celtic getting more of the pie, that’s what is has to be. As long as the other clubs are getting rewarded as well. '

Not actually much wrong with what he's said. He's basically saying that clubs need to stop mudslinging in the media, get round a table and come to a decision and stick to it whatever that decision might actually be.

Charlie isn't known for his brains and comes away with some amount of shite, but not actually said much that's controversial here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ludo*1 said:

If that decision is Rangers and Celtic getting more of the pie, that’s what is has to be. As long as the other clubs are getting rewarded as well. '

 

6 minutes ago, Ludo*1 said:

Not actually much wrong with what he's said

No surprise to see you struggling to understand it tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Twinkle said:

 

No surprise to see you struggling to understand it tbh

He's said that all clubs need to make a decision together rather than embarrassing themselves in public. It doesn't matter what the decision actually is, as long as they agree on something. No surprise to see you struggle to understand that tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ludo*1 said:

He's said that all clubs need to make a decision together rather than embarrassing themselves in public. It doesn't matter what the decision actually is, as long as they agree on something. No surprise to see you struggle to understand that tbh.

I read it. And hes advocating that the Old Firm should get a bigger slice of the pie but 'only if everyone agrees'. Fuckin ridiculous comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ludo*1 said:

Has anyone actually read what Adam has said or are you all diving in with 2 feet at the Daily Record of all places?

'... the other 10 clubs have to have a say as well. They need to all get round a table and come to a decision. If that decision is Rangers and Celtic getting more of the pie, that’s what is has to be. As long as the other clubs are getting rewarded as well. '

Not actually much wrong with what he's said. He's basically saying that clubs need to stop mudslinging in the media, get round a table and come to a decision and stick to it whatever that decision might actually be.

Charlie isn't known for his brains and comes away with some amount of shite, but not actually said much that's controversial here.

So by that logic, every time there is a new deal, Rangers and Celtic kick up a fuss and end up getting more of the deal? Either there is a better deal to be had and everyone benefits or how on earth can anyone think it is right to give them a bigger slice to keep them happy?

Also ignores the fact that the money folk get from the deal is dependent in league positions.

Charlie is a good footballer, but really, he should step away from the media stuff. They keep trotting him out knowing he will eventually make an arse of himself. He's not clever enough to be intentionally provocative like Sutton and not media polished enough like Iwolumo.

Edited by Theyellowbox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Twinkle said:

I read it. And hes advocating that the Old Firm should get a bigger slice of the pie but 'only if everyone agrees'. Fuckin ridiculous comment

He's advocating that the mudslinging and embarrassment stops and they actually communicate with each other.

Again, Adam comes away with a lot of shite the majority of the time but this one isn't worth getting upset over tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TommyDickFingers said:

Don't worry lads, Charlie has a solution.🤣

 

 

31 minutes ago, Savage Henry said:

It’s amazing- but not surprising - that current players, ex-of the Old Firm, can simultaneously support giving Rangers a direct advantage by taking away from everyone else, whilst still being employed by a direct  competitor. 

 

58 minutes ago, FTOF said:

Just give them Dundee's "share of the pie" Charlie. I'm sure that they'll be fine with that.

What a walloper.

 

56 minutes ago, oneteaminglasgow said:

“Just give Rangers what they want”

Cheers Charlie, I’m sure the SPFL couldn’t have thought of that themselves. 

 

28 minutes ago, Ric said:

To be fair, when thinking of "big brain time", it's not Charlie Adam that springs to mind. That said, I am sure it's a more coherent answer than you'd get from someone like Kris Boyd.

 

24 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said:

Charlie Adam for Commercial Manager for the SPFL!

 

22 minutes ago, Kapowzer said:

#announcecharlie

Granted you may get Diego Maradona's ghost applying

 

20 minutes ago, Twinkle said:

Fat Charlie 🤣🤣

^^^^^^^

Headline-only reading mouthbreathers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...