Jump to content

Aberdeen vs. Dundee


Recommended Posts

Hope we do these Dundee cvnts. Due some revenge after that shitshow at Dens.

The 500 cap is a flocking joke though. That video going round from Easter Road is cringe right enough but the sentiment rings true. We get our jabs, get our boosters, have vaccine passports and still it isn’t enough. Fair enough if they want to limit crowds but surely a 25% or 50% cap would have worked. Fucking daft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Redmin said:

Hope we do these Dundee cvnts. Due some revenge after that shitshow at Dens.

The 500 cap is a flocking joke though. That video going round from Easter Road is cringe right enough but the sentiment rings true. We get our jabs, get our boosters, have vaccine passports and still it isn’t enough. Fair enough if they want to limit crowds but surely a 25% or 50% cap would have worked. Fucking daft.

I hope you do us too, I have £175k on an Andy Considine hat-trick and Griffiths to get booked. Easy money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope we do these Dundee cvnts. Due some revenge after that shitshow at Dens.
The 500 cap is a flocking joke though. That video going round from Easter Road is cringe right enough but the sentiment rings true. We get our jabs, get our boosters, have vaccine passports and still it isn’t enough. Fair enough if they want to limit crowds but surely a 25% or 50% cap would have worked. Fucking daft.

Blub away tiny tears.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope we do these Dundee cvnts. Due some revenge after that shitshow at Dens.
The 500 cap is a flocking joke though. That video going round from Easter Road is cringe right enough but the sentiment rings true. We get our jabs, get our boosters, have vaccine passports and still it isn’t enough. Fair enough if they want to limit crowds but surely a 25% or 50% cap would have worked. Fucking daft.
State of this c**t [emoji23]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn’t is the case that if a player is registered as a goalkeeper, they can’t play as an outfield player? That basically means 1 substitute. 

I make that six “injuries” for an abandonment.

Edited by The Master
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Master said:

Isn’t is the case that if a player is registered as a goalkeeper, they can’t play as an outfield player? That basically means 1 substitute. 

I make that six “injuries” for an abandonment.

Surely one of these keepers is going to be coming on as a sub outfield. If it’s the young lad, what a debut to make! :lol:Otherwise no reason putting them on the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...