Jump to content

Russian invasion of Ukraine


Sonam

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Newbornbairn said:

Bollocks. 

 

I could write more but that pretty much covers it. 

Aye, you've been strident with your double standard throughout this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, FreedomFarter said:

A para is someone who's volunteered to go abroad and kill men for the "crime" of defending their homeland from the paras' invasion. We can recognise that such volunteers are deliberately steered down that path by both propaganda and socio-economic conditions. Yet an element of choice was present and I don't think its unfair to judge them for that choice. If we can question the character of Russians volunteering to do this to Ukrainians then we can also question the character of Brits volunteering to do it to Iraqis, Afghans, Kosovans and the rest.

When did brits do it to kosovans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Booker-T said:

When did brits do it to kosovans?

Paras killing a Kosovo Serb: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/shot-dead-by-the-paras-policeman-who-said-no-1099991.html

Paras killing Kosovar Albanians: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/paras-face-murder-probe-1105664.html

If you mean UK military in general and not specifically the paras, RAF pilots obviously contributed to the NATO bombing of Kosovo. That resulted in the killing of many local combatants, mostly Serbian military but also Albanian KLA. Many civilians in both Kosovo and Serbia were also killed by the bombing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_during_Operation_Allied_Force

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FreedomFarter said:

Paras killing a Kosovo Serb: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/shot-dead-by-the-paras-policeman-who-said-no-1099991.html

Paras killing Kosovar Albanians: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/paras-face-murder-probe-1105664.html

If you mean UK military in general and not specifically the paras, RAF pilots obviously contributed to the NATO bombing of Kosovo. That resulted in the killing of many local combatants, mostly Serbian military but also Albanian KLA. Many civilians in both Kosovo and Serbia were also killed by the bombing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_during_Operation_Allied_Force

And many more civilians would have been killed without those bombings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Booker-T said:

And many more civilians would have been killed without those bombings. 

Academic consensus is the opposite. Here's a Danish researcher (he's not of special significance but I have to use someone's findings as an example):

Screenshot2023-04-1010_17_38PM.thumb.png.7226d4cd9e7d74f311cde7d9151a1533.png

https://theconversation.com/kosovo-disputes-continue-20-years-after-nato-bombing-campaign-113669 

The bombing created chaos within which both the KLA and Serb paramilitaries could run riot. 

So that was outcome. Intent is worth considering too. The KLA had an established track record of killing civilians prior to the 1999 war yet the SAS still chose to provide them training, suggesting civilian casualties were not a particular UK concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signing projectiles with messages is thousands of years old.

on the left is a slingshot stone with “catch” written on it in ancient Greek, likely from more than 2000 years ago.

image.thumb.jpeg.27a233dac4be733c8b952de063f0bf91.jpeg

Edited by ICTChris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ICTChris said:

Signing projectiles with messages is thousands of years old.

on the left is a slingshot stone with “catch” written on it in ancient Greek, likely from more than 2000 years ago.

image.thumb.jpeg.27a233dac4be733c8b952de063f0bf91.jpeg

Oh, I'm well aware of the history, but uninvolved foreign civilians donating money to do it is distasteful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ICTChris said:

Signing projectiles with messages is thousands of years old.

on the left is a slingshot stone with “catch” written on it in ancient Greek, likely from more than 2000 years ago.

image.thumb.jpeg.27a233dac4be733c8b952de063f0bf91.jpeg

...and on the right is an utter moron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, highlandcowden said:

How so?

I find it a bit pathetic. He is in a difficult position no doubt, being paid to inflict damage, possibly even kill other human beings. It should be a sobering situation, not something to be glorified by demeaning your opposition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cosmic Joe said:

I find it a bit pathetic. He is in a difficult position no doubt, being paid to inflict damage, possibly even kill other human beings. It should be a sobering situation, not something to be glorified by demeaning your opposition. 

He was ground crew* so more detached from the danger and could afford to be more light-hearted. Flight crews will've been more focused, nine of them went on to die in that raid: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Tungsten

Edit: *The man in the photo, Bob Cotcher, may've been flight crew actually. I found conflicting results just now when googling him. 

Edited by FreedomFarter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FreedomFarter said:

He was ground crew* so more detached from the danger and could afford to be more light-hearted. Flight crews will've been more focused, nine of them went on to die in that raid: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Tungsten

Edit: *The man in the photo, Bob Cotcher, may've been flight crew actually. I found conflicting results just now when googling him. 

A crucial difference; he's actively involved in a war, whether he's a frontline infantryman or a mechanic. Now, compare that with a random Internet user from Scotland (for example) paying actual money from their actual bank account to sponsor a hateful message on an explosive that will be launched (with a lovely souvenir photo) to kill other humans they've never met. That's wrong from every angle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...