Crazy Feet Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 How bad is the standard of this league when a decent (and no more) amateur team come up and win the league comfortably? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossilYM Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 59 minutes ago, Crazy Feet said: How bad is the standard of this league when a decent (and no more) amateur team come up and win the league comfortably? Aren't all of them Boys Clubs? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanley Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 1 hour ago, Crazy Feet said: How bad is the standard of this league when a decent (and no more) amateur team come up and win the league comfortably? But they are competing against other teams who are not established as senior teams (other than Threave) so one of them has to win it... What it probably shows more strongly is just how weak the South of Scotland League is that Threave are struggling for third. They'll probably make it but only just. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 2 hours ago, Crazy Feet said: How bad is the standard of this league when a decent (and no more) amateur team come up and win the league comfortably? Have you seen any of these clubs this season to have came to this conclusion? Apart from Threave Rovers non of these clubs are more than 2 years old, and dealing with all that this entails. Take some time and look at some of the cup results they have had against higher league opposition. Nest season will be the proof in how the promoted teams perform and how the relegated teams from Div 3 get on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Scan Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 2 hours ago, Crazy Feet said: How bad is the standard of this league when a decent (and no more) amateur team come up and win the league comfortably? West Park have really strengthen the last month or so Getting experienced junior standard players in and it's showing 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginaro Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 5 hours ago, Crazy Feet said: How bad is the standard of this league when a decent (and no more) amateur team come up and win the league comfortably? West Park have played four games against clubs outwith the Fourth Division and haven't done too badly. 1-4 v St Cadocs, 4-3 win v Benburb, 1-2 v Renfrew and 2-4 v Camelon. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 1 hour ago, Ginaro said: West Park have played four games against clubs outwith the Fourth Division and haven't done too badly. 1-4 v St Cadocs, 4-3 win v Benburb, 1-2 v Renfrew and 2-4 v Camelon. Kilsyth Ath, Thorn Ath, BSC, Threave Rovers have all beaten higher placed opponents. Threave beat high flying St.Cadocs 3-1. Kilsyth lost 2-1 @ Inverkeithing to 2 goals in injury time. As is well known I have seen a fair few Div 4 games and will defend the quality of it. Also Finnart are hardly struggling in Div 3. So rather than just rubbishing a product because of a preconception look into it first and then judge. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeLurker Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 (edited) Wouldn't lose any sleep over comments like that. Think most people on here would acknowledge that there was some overlap in quality between top amateur clubs and the weakest junior ones because some folk prefer to be the big fish in a small pond and win trophies at a lower level than losing more games than they win at a higher one. Edited March 27 by LongTimeLurker 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 31 minutes ago, LongTimeLurker said: Wouldn't lose any sleep over comments like that. Think most people on here would acknowledge that there was some overlap in quality between top amateur clubs and the weakest junior ones becaise some folk prefer to be the big fish in a small pond and win trophies at a lower level than losing more games than they win at a higher one. What some of these clubs are showing is an ambition to give a decent product on and off the park. Considering some have started from scratch with very little resources is commendable and should be applauded and encouraged. I've no doubt some of these new clubs wont make it and will fold after a few years. Some will go the way of Harmony Row. Also no doubt some will flourish. I cannot abide people who sit in their ivory towers taking snide digs at those who are trying to achieve something. All the new clubs are a success in my eyes and I include Threave who could have stayed put in their comfort zone instead of risking failure in a newer setup. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AM-1 Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 10 hours ago, Crazy Feet said: How bad is the standard of this league when a decent (and no more) amateur team come up and win the league comfortably? For example Campbeltown Pupils are an amateur side basically consisting of teenagers/very young guys & have a tiny catchment for chosing players from unlike clubs more centrally who have their pick of players. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 (edited) 7 hours ago, AM-1 said: For example Campbeltown Pupils are an amateur side basically consisting of teenagers/very young guys & have a tiny catchment for chosing players from unlike clubs more centrally who have their pick of players. Not certain what point you are making with this statement. Are you using CFP as an example of the perceived lack of quality in Div 4? Edited March 27 by HorseyGhirl 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 The bottom line is that these clubs are in the fourth division of four. If they are better than that, they will progress. If they aren't they won't. Not sure why people are commenting on the quality. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glensmad Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 2 minutes ago, jimbaxters said: The bottom line is that these clubs are in the fourth division of four. If they are better than that, they will progress. If they aren't they won't. Not sure why people are commenting on the quality. Fifth division of five. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairWeatherFan Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 2 minutes ago, jimbaxters said: The bottom line is that these clubs are in the fourth division of four. They're actually lower than that 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 2 minutes ago, glensmad said: Fifth division of five. Just now, FairWeatherFan said: They're actually lower than that Oops. Course it is. Sorry. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 35 minutes ago, jimbaxters said: The bottom line is that these clubs are in the fourth division of four. If they are better than that, they will progress. If they aren't they won't. Not sure why people are commenting on the quality. Cause it makes them feel important. We will see next year with the promoted sides on Div 3 and also how the relegated sides cope in Div4 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AM-1 Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 1 hour ago, HorseyGhirl said: Not certain what point you are making with this statement. Are you using CFP as an example of the perceived lack of quality in Div 4? An example of some clubs having limited resources hence a knock on effect of the on field quality. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 46 minutes ago, AM-1 said: An example of some clubs having limited resources hence a knock on effect of the on field quality. It's easy to read someone's post different from what they are saying. CFP have had a number of issues squad rotation and available numbers being a big concern week in week out. Other sides have had similar; Easterhouse, Thorn which shows up in their results. The top 4 have had consistency which has shown in their results. Yes it is the bottom tier so expect the quality to be less than league's above. But had to take issue with @Crazy Feet seeepi g statement. Have seen most teams I Div 4 including games against higher opposition. And in a number of those games the quality came from the Div 4 teams. All in all its feet that the West has a vibrant, evolving product that pros and clubs want to be s part of. #monthewest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GNU_Linux Posted April 1 Author Share Posted April 1 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 (edited) 8 hours ago, GNU_Linux said: Despite some squeaky bum moments Threave look to have completed Step One, or maybe half, of the infamous 5 Year Plan. (I say half as it was mentioned that if they didnt win the league it would be deemed a failure). Edited April 2 by HorseyGhirl 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.