Jump to content

Monarchy debate/discussion


Richey Edwards

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, btb said:

What pisses me off is the "one drip at a time" nature of the revelations - this is never gonna end.

He’s got to fill 3 more books, I honestly can’t see how the f**k he’s going to string “my family were mean to me and don’t like my wife” into 4 books. Going to need a lot of pictures and filler. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scottsdad said:

He killed 25 Taliban fighters, but lost a fight to Peggy Mitchell.

Aye, good one. 

 

Probably the daftest thing he's ever said, his security team will have to be on their toes now.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The news coverage of this is genuinely disgraceful. 

This is tabloid pish - red tops are the ones that serialise autobiographies with BOMBSHELLS from celebrities. 

This irrelevant pish is subject to commentary and analysis across the bbc, including being the headline news on reporting fucking Scotland last night. 

I genuinely do not understand why people are ok with this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dons_1988 said:

The news coverage of this is genuinely disgraceful. 

This is tabloid pish - red tops are the ones that serialise autobiographies with BOMBSHELLS from celebrities. 

This irrelevant pish is subject to commentary and analysis across the bbc, including being the headline news on reporting fucking Scotland last night. 

I genuinely do not understand why people are ok with this. 

In any discussion or more robust confrontation there are certain utterances that automatically give victory to the other person... "I know you are but what am I?", "you probably believe that the moon landings actually happened as well," "the election was stolen", that kind of thing. 

In Harry's case, his apparent belief in the power of a psychic to contact his deceased mother should end any credibility he might ever have had. Game over.  I mean, I know that the institution apparently believes that they hold their position of prominence because a god says so, but for someone who believes in the monarchy to take psychics seriously? Sorry Willie boy, your brother has outed the whole revolting edifice... you are the weakest link, goodbye.  Renounce your place in the pecking (@rse-kissing) order, take your brother for a pint and tell King juglugs the game is up

Time for the whole ridiculous circus to call it a day. 

The Tories will be loving this... it's helping to keep their lot off the front pages. I'd rather the phone-ins were on food banks, the right to strike, the widening wealth gap and so on. Sunak will be delighted by this farce.  Oh, and Andrew who if anything bad had happened to Charlie years ago could be King by now.  Chew on that, royalists. 

 

Edited by Salt n Vinegar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely this thread should be discussing the constitutional legitimacy of the monarchy.

There is already a thread on General Nonsense about the tittle tattle shit filling the media and diverting the public from thinking about any real issues affecting the UK.

Congratualtions Harry & Meghan - The General Nonsense Forum - Pie & Bovril (pieandbovril.com)

And there's a thread for General Nonces as well.

Prince Andrew BBC - The General Nonsense Forum - Pie & Bovril (pieandbovril.com)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Suspect Device said:

Surely this thread should be discussing the constitutional legitimacy of the monarchy.

There is already a thread on General Nonsense about the tittle tattle shit filling the media and diverting the public from thinking about any real issues affecting the UK.

Congratualtions Harry & Meghan - The General Nonsense Forum - Pie & Bovril (pieandbovril.com)

And there's a thread for General Nonces as well.

Prince Andrew BBC - The General Nonsense Forum - Pie & Bovril (pieandbovril.com)

 

You’re right, if there’s one thing that the MSM will avoid even with all these revelations is the one thing that we should be talking about & that’s the archaic constitutional set up we have. 
I’d hope that the “affection” the public had for an old lady who couldn’t give a f**k about them is dying & the constant drip of seeing that instead of being “above” the population, the Royal family are a bunch of self entitled, dysfunctional arseholes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't understand all the negativity around the happy couple. They exhibit the kind of qualities we so desperately need in the third decade of the 21st century. Ha effing ha.

The other day I mentioned Harry's apparent support for psychics when he seemingly used a woman with "powers" to try to get a message from his late mum. Now, it is reported in the book, when they had been together for about a year, Megan apparently visited Diana's tomb and laid her hands on it, hoping to receive "clarity and guidance“... from the corpse of a woman who had been dead for 20 years at that point. 

These are exactly what the modern UK needs. Folk in positions of influence who believe in the supernatural and who are unashamed about publicising it.  They might think that publishing this 'spiritual' drivel helps their case. Please no. Surely not? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the one thing we can all agree on is that the funniest thing about all of this is the seething royalists who held this perfect portrayal of the royal family in their deluded little minds who are now a seething mess over all of this.

Fair fucks to Harry and Megs tbqh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Salt n Vinegar said:

I can't understand all the negativity around the happy couple. They exhibit the kind of qualities we so desperately need in the third decade of the 21st century. Ha effing ha.

The other day I mentioned Harry's apparent support for psychics when he seemingly used a woman with "powers" to try to get a message from his late mum. Now, it is reported in the book, when they had been together for about a year, Megan apparently visited Diana's tomb and laid her hands on it, hoping to receive "clarity and guidance“... from the corpse of a woman who had been dead for 20 years at that point. 

These are exactly what the modern UK needs. Folk in positions of influence who believe in the supernatural and who are unashamed about publicising it.  They might think that publishing this 'spiritual' drivel helps their case. Please no. Surely not? 

image.png.a66ffd23ed2aedc1f2530ada9ce6612d.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StellarHibee said:

I'm sure the one thing we can all agree on is that the funniest thing about all of this is the seething royalists who held this perfect portrayal of the royal family in their deluded little minds who are now a seething mess over all of this.

Fair fucks to Harry and Megs tbqh.

Indeed. The likes of the Mail, Telegraph, Express and various Piers Morgan-esque losers appear to be in a constant state of fury. If these two provoke just one aneurysm from one of these gammony fuckers, it will all have been worth it. Preferably uber-creep Piers Morgan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...