Jump to content

What is the point of labour ?


pawpar

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, oneteaminglasgow said:

I’ve met Neil Bibby and he was alright, although he’s a complete nobody so your point still stands. 

 

Aye I'm sure some of them are quite personable in private and that but Lennon seems quite well regarded, has been the name behind a recently passed universally approved bill, and crucially has attracted the ire of Wings at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Aye I'm sure some of them are quite personable in private and that but Lennon seems quite well regarded, has been the name behind a recently passed universally approved bill, and crucially has attracted the ire of Wings at some point.
The limited experience I have of meeting MSPs at committee level, they, in the main, mostly seem decent, pragmatic, able and willing to engage with issues, irrespective of party.

The issue is the party - as soon as a meeting concludes the party line and mantra takes over again. The problem Labour have is their party line has been best served with a glass of kool aid for a good few years now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Henderson to deliver ..... said:

Sarwar at evens looks a bet. Too soon for Lennon, Murray won't give up his Westminster seat, the rest are either clownshoes or nobodys.

It's just hit me how I know more about American politics than I do my own country, hardly know any of them. Is there not a chance that Murray might be fed up with the pointless job of shadow Scotland Secretary and realises he's going to stay there until Labour get another Scottish MP, which looks like a long time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

It's just hit me how I know more about American politics than I do my own country, hardly know any of them. Is there not a chance that Murray might be fed up with the pointless job of shadow Scotland Secretary and realises he's going to stay there until Labour get another Scottish MP, which looks like a long time?

Nope. He's got a good grip on the party's attitude towards Scotland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

Nope. He's got a good grip on the party's attitude towards Scotland.

But does he ever get invited to important cabinet meetings, except the photo op ones where everyone gets in? Must be a bit humiliating if he's after the limelight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

But does he ever get invited to important cabinet meetings, except the photo op ones where everyone gets in? Must be a bit humiliating if he's after the limelight.

I'm not sure. That article basically saying him and Baillie and that lectured Rayner on what the script was with Leonard suggests that he has some clout. The party at large haven't the faintest clue what to do about Scotland. There's a serious contingent of members who think Murray and Baillie should be listened to because of their constituency success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This 'the problem is that people just don't know the Labour Party are unionists' hot take (Jack McConnell's drinking buddy on Newsnight this evening) is sumptuous. Jackie Baillie or Anas Sarwar trying to outstaunch the Tories for the '50-75 Rangers fan vote' while leaving the rest of the electorate alone sounds like a sure-fire winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Henderson to deliver ..... said:

Sarwar at evens looks a bet. Too soon for Lennon, Murray won't give up his Westminster seat, the rest are either clownshoes or nobodys.

Facebook lobby page United against separation ( except the EU) are backing Sarwar.   I've his cousin on my FB page.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

I'm not sure. That article basically saying him and Baillie and that lectured Rayner on what the script was with Leonard suggests that he has some clout. The party at large haven't the faintest clue what to do about Scotland. There's a serious contingent of members who think Murray and Baillie should be listened to because of their constituency success.

Is there anyone you think might have a chance outside Sarwar, Ballie and Lennon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

Is there anyone you think might have a chance outside Sarwar, Ballie and Lennon?

I don't think Lennon will run. Sarwar was Leonard's only challenger last time and it was really timing that cost him more than anything. With Baillie fairly soundly beating Kerr and most of the Corbynistas either leaving or falling in line there's no real bloc to coalesce around someone else and no ideas other than rampant unionism. 

I don't want Lennon to run either. She's a decent enough MSP that shouldn't take that job and all the shite it entails. She's not going to do Wightman levels of good shit where she is but she can probably do better without having to age 10,000 years dealing with Sarwar and Baillie's pettiness.

Edited by NotThePars
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It feels like people have been saying that Sarwar will be their next leader for absolute donkey's years at this point, so I'm surprised to see that he only seems to have run for the leadership once before.

That's some list of former leaders, by the way. An inspiring selection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BFTD said:

It feels like people have been saying that Sarwar will be their next leader for absolute donkey's years at this point, so I'm surprised to see that he only seems to have run for the leadership once before.

That's some list of former leaders, by the way. An inspiring selection.

How does predictive text change ‘shite’ to ‘inspiring’?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, DA Baracus said:

Surely most of them will want to avoid it at the moment, as none of them want to be at the top when they take a record drubbing in the upcoming election.

People like Sarwar, Baillie and Murray believe if Labour revert back to new Labour then everyone will flock back to voting for them again.

They want to get away from the Corbyn image just like Starmer is trying to do in England and be more like Tony Blair Labour.

Labour in Scotland will do the same except  they will throw a couple of new, irrelevant powers to the Scottish parliament and claim it's devo max super plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...