Granny Danger Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 5 minutes ago, Miguel Sanchez said: What if you don't buy takeaways or have a car? Then you can spend all your time doing polls on P&B. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 37 minutes ago, throbber said: Maybe if you ate a takeaway or two you would weigh the same as a normal person. Bold talk from a man who spends most of his posts moaning about how fat his make-believe burd is 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deej Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 FFS 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 A few days late with this but only just remembered and I was too tired the other night to post. Not sure where to post it either so it's going in here. Match of the Day/The Premier League and their "we've got the best of everything" attitude (until it really matters, it would appear). There was a goal-line clearance in the Stoke game (sure it was that one) on boxing day. I was watching the BT show live and Dean Saunders was adamant it was over the line. It came back that 97% of the ball had crossed the line. I was looking forward to seeing the technology on this one as I can't recall a chance being so close since it's been installed. We were shown a goal-line clearance earlier on Match of the Day that was even remotely debateable. It could have been the Spurs game. The ball was clearly in front of the line but we were still shown the wonders of their technology as well as two different camera angles. The game came with the chance, the chance was shown and it was completely bypassed by the commentator, the technology and the camera. Genuinely we were shown the scramble a couple of times but from one camera angle. The ball looked over the line from the awful angle we were given but we weren't given anything else. It then went to the studio and again it was totally bypassed. Considering they can't wait to show the technology working at any opportunity and cream themselves in the process, I find it remarkable they wouldn't show the technology catching the ball 97% over the line. So is it a fair assumption that their superb piece of equipment doesn't fully work? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 26 minutes ago, 19QOS19 said: So is it a fair assumption that their superb piece of equipment doesn't fully work? I'm sure earlier in the season a ref stopped the game to declare the goal mouth technology was not working and would not be relied upon as the ball had clearly crossed the line in an offside situation but it hadn't registered on his watch. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 Maybe they don’t understand it.Remember the mess that fat turd Jonathan Pearce got himself into at the 2014 WC? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 55 minutes ago, 19QOS19 said: A few days late with this but only just remembered and I was too tired the other night to post. Not sure where to post it either so it's going in here. Match of the Day/The Premier League and their "we've got the best of everything" attitude (until it really matters, it would appear). There was a goal-line clearance in the Stoke game (sure it was that one) on boxing day. I was watching the BT show live and Dean Saunders was adamant it was over the line. It came back that 97% of the ball had crossed the line. I was looking forward to seeing the technology on this one as I can't recall a chance being so close since it's been installed. We were shown a goal-line clearance earlier on Match of the Day that was even remotely debateable. It could have been the Spurs game. The ball was clearly in front of the line but we were still shown the wonders of their technology as well as two different camera angles. The game came with the chance, the chance was shown and it was completely bypassed by the commentator, the technology and the camera. Genuinely we were shown the scramble a couple of times but from one camera angle. The ball looked over the line from the awful angle we were given but we weren't given anything else. It then went to the studio and again it was totally bypassed. Considering they can't wait to show the technology working at any opportunity and cream themselves in the process, I find it remarkable they wouldn't show the technology catching the ball 97% over the line. So is it a fair assumption that their superb piece of equipment doesn't fully work? You weren't even sure what game it was so not sure how you can be critical 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 Do the signals not work accurately if there is human flesh or bones in the way? Seemed totally unnecessary to me anyway, hardly ever happens and it's too expensive for most leagues to think about. Dodgy ref decisions give something to talk about in the pub afterwards. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeAreElgin Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 The security guard in the office today has decided to stop the door from opening automatically, meaning I have to actually push the door to get in. What sort of a world is this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 5 minutes ago, WeAreElgin said: The security guard in the office today has decided to stop the door from opening automatically, meaning I have to actually push the door to get in. What sort of a world is this. 4 minutes ago, WeAreElgin said: The security guard in the office today has decided to stop the door from opening automatically, meaning I have to actually push the door to get in. What sort of a world is this. Are you going to tell us every time you use the door? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeAreElgin Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Are you going to tell us every time you use the door? Are you Irish, mid 50s, with grey hair?It's you, isn't it. You c**t. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just now, WeAreElgin said: Are you Irish, mid 50s, with grey hair? It's you, isn't it. You c**t. I didn't stay on at school until half way through 5th year to be a security guard. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_Wilkos Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Maybe they don’t understand it.Remember the mess that fat turd Jonathan Pearce got himself into at the 2014 WC? The best moment of the World Cup IMO. "IT'S CHANGED ITS MIND" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 17 minutes ago, Steve_Wilkos said: The best moment of the World Cup IMO. "IT'S CHANGED ITS MIND" It was funny. He got panned for it as well on Twitter. Someone said maybe start him off with a toaster and work up to goal line technology. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 45 minutes ago, Steve_Wilkos said: The best moment of the World Cup IMO. "IT'S CHANGED ITS MIND" Had to google that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 19 minutes ago, Melanius Mullarkey said: Some c**t (a GP no less) on The Chase thinks that Tchaikovsky weaved the melody of Waltizing Matilda into the 1812 overture, rather than La Marseillaise. Now some c**t on Pointless has just said "I've never been there and I'm not going there again". I like a man that doesn't waste his time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ2 Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Now some c**t on Pointless has just said "I've never been there and I'm not going there again". Will which is it? Stupid c**t. Him, no you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_Wilkos Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 It was funny. He got panned for it as well on Twitter. Someone said maybe start him off with a toaster and work up to goal line technology. Had to google that. Poor Martin Keown having to deal with that fat mess. "This is not the system we use in the PREMIER LEAGUE!" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Phil Taylor actually makes me ill. Dirty, sex pest w****r. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 I've been watching the football in the other room. She is watching Dreamgirls. I've never heard a racket like it. It has actually given me a headache. While we're at it, the apple advert. "What you doing on your computer? What's a computer"? Don't come the cùnt with me ya cheeky wee b*****d, or I'll put my fùcking foot through it. 18 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.