Akritoi Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 because she wouldn't take her medicine. In the library... Cluedo has nothing on this 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 (edited) In the library...Cluedo has nothing on this Does Cluedo have a fat hysterical cow slandering the local legal system? Edited September 13, 2007 by vikingTON -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akritoi Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Does Cluedo have a fat hysterical cow slandering the legal system? Does depending on which pub you're in playing it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Does depending on which pub you're in playing it You should just tell Philpy's Missus to stay out of it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philpy Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 You should just tell Philpy's Missus to stay out of it. No need 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 No need Well it had to be someone's missus, and you were the one that made the original accusation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qos_75 Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 It's nice of Renault to give 10% of sales of the new Renault McCann to the appeal. It's so comfortable you forget your kids are in the back. ***Boom, tish**** I'll get my coat. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShakehandsTom - DFC Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 I see that they're now after Kate's diary. Ok, it may yeild essential evidence, but don't want this to come accross the wrong way, but if she'd written anything which may be incriminating in the case against her, in her diary, then that's a pretty stupid thing to do... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 I see that they're now after Kate's diary. Ok, it may yeild essential evidence, but don't want this to come accross the wrong way, but if she'd written anything which may be incriminating in the case against her, in her diary, then that's a pretty stupid thing to do... After something happened yes, but there may be details of her behaviour before anything happened that could be used as evidence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 After something happened yes, but there may be details of her behaviour before anything happened that could be used as evidence. What, like :- August 22nd 2006, Maddy will just not stop crying today. I wish i could shut her up, she is doing my nut in. There is nothing that will be in the diary that will be able to be used as evidence against her. (unless she admits to it) Everything that is being released suggests (atleast to me) that the police have f**k all to go on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 What, like :-August 22nd 2006, Maddy will just not stop crying today. I wish i could shut her up, she is doing my nut in. There is nothing that will be in the diary that will be able to be used as evidence against her. (unless she admits to it) Everything that is being released suggests (atleast to me) that the police have f**k all to go on. Maddy's sleeping habits Arguements between her & him. Whether they were big dirty swingers. Wouldn't be anything that proves they did it or not but could give insights. Enties in diary could be different to what she has told police proving her a liar. Could make her look really bad (worse) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Maddy's sleeping habits Arguements between her & him. Whether they were big dirty swingers. Wouldn't be anything that proves they did it or not but could give insights. Enties in diary could be different to what she has told police proving her a liar. Could make her look really bad (worse) So it could make her look bad, and therefore prove she killed Maddy. Righty-o. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 The police have no case against anyone. They are clutching at straws and making a complete arse of things. They should get off their fat arses and try and find the girl dead or alive. Useless b*****ds. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 (edited) So it could make her look bad, and therefore prove she killed Maddy. Righty-o. Read my post again. I said nothing that would prove anything. Doesn't mean it wouldn't be incriminating. Edited September 13, 2007 by Ziggy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 After something happened yes, but there may be details of her behaviour before anything happened that could be used as evidence. Read my post again.I said nothing that would prove anything. Doesn't mean it wouldn't be incriminating. So if it is going to be used as evidence, doesnt that mean it will be used to help prove she did it, or why would they use it as evidence? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 So if it is going to be used as evidence, doesnt that mean it will be used to help prove she did it, or why would they use it as evidence? It doesn't have to say anything about what happened to Maddy and it could still be incriminating. It could just be used to help the prosecution show that she is violent, a nutter, moody, drug taker, anything. It all helps to paint the picture that what she has been telling lies to police and that she can't be trusted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluetooner Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 It all helps to paint the picture that what she has been telling lies to police and that she can't be trusted. Telling lies to the police about her sex life and marriage. Yup she definitely killed Maddy. They have f**k all to go on. It is a waste of time. If they have the proof that has been said they do (especially on here) then they wouldnt need her diary to show she has lied to the police. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 It doesn't have to say anything about what happened to Maddy and it could still be incriminating. It could just be used to help the prosecution show that she is violent, a nutter, moody, drug taker, anything.It all helps to paint the picture that what she has been telling lies to police and that she can't be trusted. You are straw clutching just about as badly as the useless fuckers in the Portugese polis. There is no evidence to support any claims that Madelaine was killed by her parents. Its all nonsense. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Telling lies to the police about her sex life and marriage. Yup she definitely killed Maddy.They have f**k all to go on. It is a waste of time. If they have the proof that has been said they do (especially on here) then they wouldnt need her diary to show she has lied to the police. You are straw clutching just about as badly as the useless fuckers in the Portugese polis.There is no evidence to support any claims that Madelaine was killed by her parents. Its all nonsense. FFs. I'm no saying she did it. I'm no saying that the police have got anything to go on. I'm not saying that she will get convicted because of a stupid fucking diary. All I'm saying is that the diary could be incriminating even if she isn't a couple moron. I only said that in response to what shakey posted earlier on. Stop fucking trying to twist my fucking words. You are worse that the portuguese plod. I'm no answering any other questions until I speak to my Auntie Phil. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 FFs.I'm no saying she did it. I'm no saying that the police have got anything to go on. I'm not saying that she will get convicted because of a stupid fucking diary. All I'm saying is that the diary could be incriminating even if she isn't a couple moron. I only said that in response to what shakey posted earlier on. Stop fucking trying to twist my fucking words. You are worse that the portuguese plod. I'm no answering any other questions until I speak to my Auntie Phil. The Portugese plod were trying to make out that her bible was incriminating because there was a slight fold at a crucial page which had a tenuous link with what happened to Madelaine. And settle down. Nobody is trying to twist your words. Decipher them maybe... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.