Jump to content

H_B

Gold Members
  • Posts

    13,168
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by H_B

  1. Out of interest, how often do you think people will come out in profit after 100,000 spins of roulette?

    I know, silly me for thinking you can't beat a game with the odds firmly stacked against you. .

    Well its good to see that the odds on you making a c**t of yourself in this thread went from 1/10 to 1/1000,

    Who exactly has mentioned 100,000 spins of roulette?

    Where your fail began here (if we're ignoring for a sec your fucking atrocious understanding of addiction) is that you equated probability with certainty. An exercise in arrant stupidity.

    Which is why you are being pointed and laughed at. And your contribution is being read through finger tips.

    Carry on though. Your utter fail here is extremely entertaining.

  2. ETA: fucking LOL at you having a go at people's understanding of probability while claiming you can beat roulette in the long run :lol:

    The fact you are using the term "beat" indicates your stupidity. As I said, you fail utterly to understand how random chance works.

    If I put £10 a day on Red on one spin of roulette in a FOBT for the rest of my life I may come out in profit. I will be more likely to come out down, but that's not what your original claim was.

    As I said, you don't understand what you are talking about. On the whole subject really. I did particularly enjoy your Homer Simpson-esque understanding of why people have gambling addictions though. Well done on that.

    I was waiting on you asking why alcoholics have vodka for breakfast when cereal with skimmed milk would be much healthier for them.

  3. Fair enough, maybe it is naive. I just find it amazing people can understand they're going to lose money yet continue to play these games day after day.

    This isn't true. You aren't guaranteed to lose money playing FOBTs . Or roulette. Or the lottery.

    People win. People lose. Overall yes, the total amount put into the machines is greater than the amount taken out but that doesn't mean every individual loses. Quite obviously.

  4. Coral rumoured to be about to be merged with Ladbrokes.

    Could be that programme was a final f**k you.

    Corals are heavily bonus based. I had one of their card things and anytime I went to the shop to withdraw money they got me to log into a FOBT and just hit withdraw.

    Went through as a session of however much I withdrew and appeared in their stats as if I'd been playing the machine.

  5. Agreed and I think I said something similar after the New Zealand series but the bowling was worse than the batting. Can't remember who mentioned it or where I seen it but less than 10% of the balls faced by Australia would have hit the stumps if there was no batsman there. That's criminal!

    "The group" didn't "execute their plans" well enough.

  6. Ballance isn't a no.3 batsman. Doesn't bat there for Yorks so why are England making him do so.

    Another thing that needs to improve is their bowling target. The inability to make the Aussies work is almost as bad and the batting

    Agreed. The last test was just shameful all round.

    Need to win the toss really next Test.

  7. What the hell happened to Daniel Evans by the way? Back in the days when Murray wasn't playing DC and it was always Ward and Evans in the singles, Evans looked like the better player.

    He got injured. And he's always had an issue with training and commitment. He's basically a wee boy in a man's body. Talented but completely incapable of working hard enough to be successful.

  8. Ward can and has been pretty good on his day but he's nowhere near a top 40 grass player.

    He's made the 3rd of Wimbledon once in how many 'free' attempts?

    He's had some good performances in the Davis Cup but not many outside of it, he's top 100 on the back of an anomalous run at Wimbledon.

    Let's not get carried away on the back of Andy Murray's performances here. ;)

    Well, grass is his best surface, and there's still a good number in the top 100 in the "grass is for cows" camp. He is quite clearly much higher in the world on that surface than on clay for example, where he'd be lucky to be top 200.

    He's a former Queens semi finalist - I noted you missed that out. Also, he's improved immeasurably in the last few years.

    Interesting that the world number 89 is "nowhere near" top 40 on his best surface.

  9. Bairstow and Taylor are making runs in county cricket too, and will be just waiting on a phone call

    Australia have shown in the last test that the "be wary of making changes" lot are wrong as often as they are right.

    Watson and Haddin out and their replacements are an immediate success. If you have 3 guys who you fully expect will struggle to make 50 between them in the next innings, you have to take the chance to make changes.

    Worst case scenario, the likes of Hales, Taylor, Hildreth and Bairstow will make 7 too. which is all the other three are in all probability going to achieve.

  10. Need at least 2 changes to the batting line up for the next test.

    The fact it's at Edgbaston might save Bell's place for one more test. Can't continue with Lyth and Ballance in the top 3 though. Problem is who do you pick?

    Bairstow should play, and you really have to go with Hales. He might fail, but I'd have more confidence in him than Lyth who looks awful.

×
×
  • Create New...