Jump to content

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, diegomarahenry said:

The sun reported that the presenter sent a picture of them in their pants. So either the picture is false or an unrelated picture of is arse. Or the Sun never saw the picture. 

Not necessarily.

There might have been pictures exchanged but not when underage and not involving huge sums of money to feed drug habits.

We don't know, and we're probably not going to.

I expect the news cycle to move on now, midst relief that nobody was named.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Musketeer Gripweed said:

And I can tell some of you are gutted that this ended without another BBC scapegoat as well spreading gossip like Ena Sharples. One for the kids there.

Yip.

You gets tons of anti-BBC sentiment on here.  Much of it is short sighted and daft.  They know not  what they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This in the same week someone just made up a story that suited them because they wanted it to go out as well. 

 

 

Classic press week on this stupid island 

Edited by itzdrk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, doulikefish said:

It's now all a big cover up by the beebs...the zoomers are on fire on twitterworld 

I feel confident you are not using this correctly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ludo*1 said:

So a side from everything else, has there been any context for the picture of Huw Edward's arse trending? 

Just a nice photie for us all to enjoy at this trying time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ludo*1 said:

So a side from everything else, has there been any context for the picture of Huw Edward's arse trending? 

He was just looking around for a Corby trouser press with his laptop webcam left on accidently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, alta-pete said:

Presumably the maw will be able to produce (or the polis can demand) the bank statements showing the inflow of money? 

Waste of time as every police finance expert in the UK is currently still sifting through samples of soil from Sturgeon's garden

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, alta-pete said:

Presumably the maw will be able to produce (or the polis can demand) the bank statements showing the inflow of money? 

That would be quite the breach of powers for the police to go through someone's bank accounts for someone who says that they are not a victim nor have they reported anything to them.  We haven't reached that level of dystopia just yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, itzdrk said:

That would be quite the breach of powers for the police to go through someone's bank accounts for someone who says that they are not a victim nor have they reported anything to them.  We haven't reached that level of dystopia just yet. 

They will if they believe blackmails involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, itzdrk said:

That would be quite the breach of powers for the police to go through someone's bank accounts for someone who says that they are not a victim nor have they reported anything to them.  We haven't reached that level of dystopia just yet. 

Not so sure. She’s made some serious allegations, possibly criminal if false. It seems the first thing the polis do these days is go through phones/laptops to see what their suspect has been up to.

£35k there? Someone has some explaining to do. No £35k? Someone has some explaining to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said:

Not necessarily.

There might have been pictures exchanged but not when underage and not involving huge sums of money to feed drug habits.

We don't know, and we're probably not going to.

I expect the news cycle to move on now, midst relief that nobody was named.

 

26 minutes ago, Ludo*1 said:

So a side from everything else, has there been any context for the picture of Huw Edward's arse trending? 

I was also referring to Huw's arse pics btw. 

Edited by RuMoore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...