Benjamin_Nevis Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Funny how Rangers get the decisions against them when it won't make a blind bit of difference to the result. Yes, exactly, 45mins to go, playing complete dross. Why else would he disallow that goal, other than to make himself look like a neutral? He knows In the unlikely event Rangers didn't run a mock in the second half he could make sure they got the three points. How would I know, any better than you, what is taught in East End schools? Why then did he chop off the 'goal'? You lot should be machine-gunned at birth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SON76 Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Wtf was Colin Hendry talking about there? Something about glass half full/empty.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liason909 Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Shocker of a third. Fuxxake potter. What did Potter do wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GAD Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 How would I know, any better than you, what is taught in East End schools? Why then did he chop off the 'goal'? Nutter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fife Saint Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 You're a fucking ignoramus. Can you even leave your house for fear of being murdered by wandering bands of Protestant referees? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GAD Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 What did Potter do wrong? Be on the pitch when we lost a goal. Lee Mair and Garry Brady weren't playing today you see, so that makes everything Potter's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue-mad-coo Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Has anyone got a link for the hearts vs hibs game?! cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 What did Potter do wrong? He produced a shocking header backwards instead of forwards as he is unable to head the ball properly. McAusland should still have dealt with it after that though. Good first half display, never switched on for the second and some poor defending. No complaints with the score - can't even blame the ref! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chico Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 He produced a shocking header backwards instead of forwards as he is unable to head the ball properly. McAusland should still have dealt with it after that though. Good first half display, never switched on for the second and some poor defending. No complaints with the score - can't even blame the ref! Yup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenburn bud Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Don't know how it looked on the telly but imo Craig Thomson had a shocking game. once again the old firm team get all the decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chico Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 What did Potter do wrong? Initial ball. Was he trying to head back to the keeper or has he a head like a shoebox? Whatever happened ball runs on, mcausland tries to defend it and another stupid goal conceded. Maybe it'll look different on highlights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossC93 Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Don't know how it looked on the telly but imo Craig Thomson had a shocking game. once again the old firm team get all the decisions. Yep, yet again OF got every 50-50 challenge and moan when we get a blatant free kick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossC93 Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Initial ball. Was he trying to head back to the keeper or has he a head like a shoebox? Whatever happened ball runs on, mcausland tries to defend it and another stupid goal conceded. Maybe it'll look different on highlights. Potter had a striker charging towards him, all he can do is head it back to McAusland/Samson, which is what he done, Potter is a scapegoat, though and will get the blame for every slight error made by someone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weiss_Guy Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Don't know how it looked on the telly but imo Craig Thomson had a shocking game. once again the old firm team get all the decisions. We'll give you 24 hours to check the highlights and then come back and edit this post. Oh and you can apologise too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jie Bie Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Why else would he disallow that goal, other than to make himself look like a neutral? He knows In the unlikely event Rangers didn't run a mock in the second half he could make sure they got the three points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunning1874 Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Don't know how it looked on the telly but imo Craig Thomson had a shocking game. once again the old firm team get all the decisions. Yep, yet again OF got every 50-50 challenge and moan when we get a blatant free kick. For once, this doesn't wash. It was Rangers that had a perfectly good goal disallowed for nothing, it was St. Mirren that got a penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Sensible Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share Posted November 7, 2010 He produced a shocking header backwards instead of forwards as he is unable to head the ball properly. McAusland should still have dealt with it after that though. The Potter boo boys are unbelievable! He had a striker challenging him. He headed the ball back and it should have been easy for McAusland to deal with. The goal was McAusland's error and McAusland's error alone. As for the game, expected nothing so no problem with the result. The positives were that McGregor, Potter & Travner were great today again. The 3 at the back is allowing Travner to get forward and he's good at it. We were poor up front again though. Wardlaw was terrible and never looked like scoring while Mooy was very poor. I hope there is more to come from him after the way he was built up. So far he's been a ghost. Michael Higdon should have been on from the start. At least he got into a couple of goalscoring positions, unlike Wardlaw. Wednesday night at Tannadice is the real game for us. Need to have Higdon back in the starting line up because he at least provides a scoring threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Sensible Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share Posted November 7, 2010 We'll give you 24 hours to check the highlights and then come back and edit this post. Oh and you can apologise too. No need. He disallowed a perfectly good goal for us and failed to send off Weiss for violent conduct when the score was 0-0. That would have put a completely differebnt perspective on the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Sensible Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share Posted November 7, 2010 For once, this doesn't wash. It was Rangers that had a perfectly good goal disallowed for nothing, We had a perfecttly good goal disallowed for nothing before Rangers. it was St. Mirren that got a penalty. For a clear cut, stonewall hand ball? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Sensible Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share Posted November 7, 2010 Will the SPL take action for the sectarian song sung by Rangers fans today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.