ShaggerG Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 41 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said: I don’t know how many TBH. All I was told was they had people sign up and others increasing their monthly. I'll increase my subscription too once I'm certain that my pensions are safe. If they go under I won't be able to afford toilet paper to wipe my arse never mind going to the football!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabba Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 I’ve signed up today, I don’t agree with the wording but the club clearly needs our money 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaggerG Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 7 minutes ago, Shabba said: I’ve signed up today, I don’t agree with the wording but the club clearly needs our money Well done mate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUMBER 7 Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 (edited) The wording of the 90% 10% and bringing "fairness" into the statement is quite poor in how it has come across. The message that we need more funding is 100% clear, but it is going to be a huge ask for FSS to make that up. I joined FSS and pay an annual amount even though i've still to convince myself if Fans Ownership is what i really want. I wouldn't be adverse to giving them another one off donation on their Website. Maybe highlighting to supporters that it is possible to make an occasional payment ( donation ) to FSS without becoming a member might get folks that can only afford a few quid to chip in. Edited September 30, 2022 by NUMBER 7 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shodwall cat Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 32 minutes ago, Reggie Perrin said: Failure to get out of this league in the next two seasons at the very latest is the greatest threat to our club. Klopp or Guardiola could not have won us promotion with the squad McGlynn inherited, money had to be made available to give us a chance. A gamble yes but one that absolutely had to be taken and so far appears to be giving us a real chance. A chance of winning the league if we can actually survive till the end of the season. These targets to cover losses have been pie in the sky from the start and should never have been put out as a feasible way to cover ever increasing losses. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbhaf Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 For all those that didn't receive the email, it had gone into my junk folder.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hartleys18/19Army Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 The problem is everything is starting to look good(not amazing) on the park and as long as things are going well there football fans can be an easily satisfied bunch. Then grenades are thrown in out of nowhere. Now let's have it right, that email has essentially called 90% of the fanbase, lesser fans than the super 10%. Whether they like it or not that is just as bad as previous board incidents and can't be ignored. Whether it was meant or not by current or previous boards, this sort of them and us idea is simply not on and has to change. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawson Park Boy Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 1 hour ago, Back Post Misses said: Unless of course they have Plan B already in the pipeline, but Fan ownership is their preferred choice? And before anyone asks that is conjecture on my part absolutely no knowledge. Yes- fair enough. Maybe it’s time to reveal PlanB? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reggie Perrin Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 3 minutes ago, Shodwall cat said: A chance of winning the league if we can actually survive till the end of the season. These targets to cover losses have been pie in the sky from the start and should never have been put out as a feasible way to cover ever increasing losses. FSS is clearly not going to generate the hoped for income but the BoD have back up plans which may not be the preferred options but will keep us going. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawson Park Boy Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 2 minutes ago, Reggie Perrin said: FSS is clearly not going to generate the hoped for income but the BoD have back up plans which may not be the preferred options but will keep us going. Hope so. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kemlinbairn Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 1 hour ago, roman_bairn said: Yes I think it’s time to stop getting all worked up over some misguided wording, and look at the bigger picture here which is safeguarding the future of our club today….. Seconded 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardle is Magic Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 4 hours ago, Hughsie said: It’s a poorly worded statement but I do think there’s been a bit of an overreaction over it. I think years of bad statements have conditioned our supporters to react like this. I think years of bad statements have just lowered the bar for you so much that this seems minor in comparison. I'm not even a Falkirk fan but found it wildly out of touch and Tory af 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LatapyBairn. Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 33 minutes ago, Shodwall cat said: A chance of winning the league if we can actually survive till the end of the season. These targets to cover losses have been pie in the sky from the start and should never have been put out as a feasible way to cover ever increasing losses. Promotion in itself would manage the projected loss, without being reckless the phrase “speculate to accumulate” applies here or we could easily become and Airdrie and rot away to a shadow of our former club if we were to remain in this league much longer. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LatapyBairn. Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 (edited) Glad to hear our fans have been proactive and the FSS have had a bit of a boost in subscriptions and a few folk upping there existing subscription. If the fans can get the club through this period we’ll be a stronger club for it long term. I really don’t like the idea of going back to an MSG type ownership model, genuinely believe fan ownership is a positive influence as has been shown at other clubs our size. Edited September 30, 2022 by LatapyBairn. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 36 minutes ago, Hartleys18/19Army said: The problem is everything is starting to look good(not amazing) on the park and as long as things are going well there football fans can be an easily satisfied bunch. Then grenades are thrown in out of nowhere. Now let's have it right, that email has essentially called 90% of the fanbase, lesser fans than the super 10%. Whether they like it or not that is just as bad as previous board incidents and can't be ignored. Whether it was meant or not by current or previous boards, this sort of them and us idea is simply not on and has to change. If that had come from Deans & Co the site would have went into meltdown. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proudtobeabairn Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 If FSS membership is struggling then we should be looking at other ways to make it work not canning it if everyone doesn't sign up by the end of October. E.g offer a 'pay what you can' option or £5 minimum which would at least acknowledge the current climate. Add some value add benefits to membership at low cost (e.g prize draws involving shirts or 'meet the manager 1 on 1 type sessions as prizes). Refer a friend and get free pies for a month...you get the idea. The answer to getting more members isn't to offend those who aren't signed up but to get creative to encourage more members. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bairn88 Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 2 minutes ago, Proudtobeabairn said: If FSS membership is struggling then we should be looking at other ways to make it work not canning it if everyone doesn't sign up by the end of October. E.g offer a 'pay what you can' option or £5 minimum which would at least acknowledge the current climate. Add some value add benefits to membership at low cost (e.g prize draws involving shirts or 'meet the manager 1 on 1 type sessions as prizes). Refer a friend and get free pies for a month...you get the idea. The answer to getting more members isn't to offend those who aren't signed up but to get creative to encourage more members. Agreed. Numbers have been a tad disappointing but we have a solid foundation of over 500 members. Fan ownership is a long term project, not something that can be “binned” after a year. That would be a colossal mistake, on par with previous boards 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoBNob Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 Apologies another poster brought it up but the quote has disappeared. But surely with those financial figures the role of the board is to not spunk so much money up the wall? There's not been a shortage of signings this summer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Caractacus Potts Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Grant228 said: Apologies another poster brought it up but the quote has disappeared. But surely with those financial figures the role of the board is to not spunk so much money up the wall? There's not been a shortage of signings this summer. I agree too. There has to be some acceptance of money squandered by those in charge too before fans are criticised for not spending more. If you choose to that then quite rightly some serious questions will then be asked about how money has been spent. Leigh Griffiths was a risk and ultimately a waste of money, Finlay Malcolm was a bizarre signing and waste of a wage so far. Was it worthwhile to move to training on grass at this point in time? There’s a few things that could maybe have been handled better so I think a bit of accountability wouldn’t go amiss and would help bridge the gap with fans. Edited September 30, 2022 by Caractacus Potts 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 8 minutes ago, Grant228 said: Apologies another poster brought it up but the quote has disappeared. But surely with those financial figures the role of the board is to not spunk so much money up the wall? There's not been a shortage of signings this summer. We will take no lectures from followers of Hoofball Athletic with your track record thank you very much. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.