Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

So Wiggy Milne wants Rangers 'back' and states Scottish football is poorer without us in the top tier. How can anyone find this objectionable?

As your punctuation suggests, it may or may not be seen as objectionable, but unless someone makes an offer for the remains on the liquidators' slab, it is impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The estimable Peter Houston jumping on the 'back' bandwagon in today's Record:

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/peter-houston-says-falkirk-side-7020618

So one chairman and one manager admitting we should return to the top table and that the first tier is poorer without us. Good to see well-regarded blokes like these having their finger on the pulse of fans' attitudes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The estimable Peter Houston jumping on the 'back' bandwagon in today's Record:

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/peter-houston-says-falkirk-side-7020618

So one chairman and one manager admitting we should return to the top table and that the first tier is poorer without us. Good to see well-regarded blokes like these having their finger on the pulse of fans' attitudes.

Craig Levein's right hand man at Scotland is a clueless idiot?

I'd no idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The estimable Peter Houston jumping on the 'back' bandwagon in today's Record:

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/peter-houston-says-falkirk-side-7020618

So one chairman and one manager admitting we should return to the top table and that the first tier is poorer without us. Good to see well-regarded blokes like these having their finger on the pulse of fans' attitudes.

There's probably no denying that the top tier is poorer financially without Rangers, and indeed Hibs.

However, isn't that missing the whole point of the league set up? Or indeed of competitive sport at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's probably no denying that the top tier is poorer financially without Rangers, and indeed Hibs.

However, isn't that missing the whole point of the league set up? Or indeed of competitive sport at all.

Spot on.

The only argument for having them in the top flight concerns gross income.

The imbalance in the Scottish game means however that in relative terms to the strongest, most clubs would become worse off.

When the whole point and appeal, is meant to be competition, that's hardly a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem we have with Stewart Milne is that legally the board of directors are there to protect the interests of Shareholders in a company and therefore a heavy part of that is finances and the financial health of a business. The company itself therefore also wants to be showing growth and feasibility for investment.

So from that polarized view of it which directors are legally bound to pursue, then Stewart Milne has to believe that having Rangers back is a good "commercial" event to happen in the short run.

I say short run because I believe it is a very short term view of the situation and disappointing certainly from a fans perspective as we as a club are moving forward so much without the presence of the Govan mob. While their return will undoubtedly see an uplift in tv revenue and potentially a larger away support in place of a smaller club but it risks losing something much bigger in a club that over the last few years has re-engaged with the fans and the city. If we go back to the two horse race, in a country that lets be honest is not a million miles from only having two/three european spots to fight for instead of the current four, that will be a difficult road for AFC.

To my mind Milne should be looking 3/4/5 years down the line at the potential impact of the two horse race monotony returning and the club losing touch with the fans again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's probably no denying that the top tier is poorer financially without Rangers, and indeed Hibs.

However, isn't that missing the whole point of the league set up? Or indeed of competitive sport at all.

Poorer?

But its meant to be booming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's probably no denying that the top tier is poorer financially without Rangers, and indeed Hibs.

However, isn't that missing the whole point of the league set up? Or indeed of competitive sport at all.

It's called sporting integrity , something the Klan missed when their old club died and they went on a media blitz threatening everyone that Scottish football would die and clubs would go to the wall , and there would be no TV deal if Sevco FC weren't instantly placed into the SPL .

Luckily nae c**t listened to the Zombies and they were told to f**k off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a load of tosh, if Rangers win the championship or go up in the play offs then we deserve to be there, if we fail then we do not...end of, your own opinion on what is good or bad has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Agreed, provided they haven't cheated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's probably no denying that the top tier is poorer financially without Rangers, and indeed Hibs.

However, isn't that missing the whole point of the league set up? Or indeed of competitive sport at all.

That is something you have to take up with messrs Milne and Houston. They are clearly at odds with the Rangers-obsessed diddies on here.

Edited by The_Kincardine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's probably no denying that the top tier is poorer financially without Rangers, and indeed Hibs.

However, isn't that missing the whole point of the league set up? Or indeed of competitive sport at all.

The club don't do "sport"

The company doesn't do sustainable business.

Bring them back now!! :thumsup2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that it's all one league set-up, and approximately the same number of fans go to watch sevco as used to watch rangers, and Hibs' crowds are roughly the same, what's the problem? Surely there's the same money coming into the game as before?

Take that up with Wiggy Milne. Aberdeen's chairman disagrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the point Ranaldo Bairn is making is that Aberdeen's loss is Falkirk's gain.

Not a point that's likely to carry much weight with Milne.

Obviously The Blue Pound has been spread widely and gladly and many have benefited through our 'journey'.

Wiggy's point, though, backed up by Houston was different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...