williemillersmoustache Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 ^^^^trying a wee bit to hard ^^Crying because he wants to know where Spot is but can't read the bigger words. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Is the intrepid James Doleman really oor very own HBQC? @jamesdoleman The new indictment relates to Charles Green. You really don't get this legal stuff do you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Looks like chucky is going back to court to try and get the Gers to pay his costs. He's a vicious wee kunt too, best to pay up IMO. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 ^^Crying because he wants to know where Spot is but can't read the bigger words. Who the f**k is spot? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killienick Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Who the f**k is spot? /\/\/\ Title of the next book IMO. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/627106/Aberdeen-chairman-Stewart-Milne-Scottish-football-Rangers-Premiership Ken and willietache won't like this yin , sack the board? I don't like it all! Milne is gibbering about this club coming 'back'. you can build hooses Stewarty, but I doubt if you can raise the dead. I also doubt if any version of the Govan Ghouls will adopt what any sane person would consider to be 'the right approach'. It is just not in their collective DNA (plus what willie's mouser said) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 So even if we get promoted by winning the league or play off, that wouldn't be enough for wiggy? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 So even if we get promoted by winning the league or play off, that wouldn't be enough for wiggy? he doesn't have wear a wig. ( he may have his classic rug in a display cabinet, or buried in a vault) don't you think all entrants participating in sporting endeavour should do so with a 'right approach'? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Depends on what the wigster means by that, its open to interpretation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adundeemonkey Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 I like how the article with Milne skirts around the major piece of evidence that the current Rangers are not the same as the Old Rangers. In the first sentence it states In 2012, Milne was one of 10 SPL chairmen who voted against the Light Blues playing in their league after the club was liquidated. One of the other two were Rangers (Old) who voted to let Rangers (New) into the league. It is unusual for the media to reference this event as it is the one thing that blows the whole 'same club' argument out of the water. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/627106/Aberdeen-chairman-Stewart-Milne-Scottish-football-Rangers-Premiership Ken and willietache won't like this yin , sack the board? Disappointing, but I'd imagine that Aberdeen fans already knew that Milne was a p***k. I certainly did. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranaldo Bairn Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 adundeemonkey, on 16 Dec 2015 - 16:38, said: I like how the article with Milne skirts around the major piece of evidence that the current Rangers are not the same as the Old Rangers. In the first sentence it states adundeemonkey, on 16 Dec 2015 - 16:38, said:In 2012, Milne was one of 10 SPL chairmen who voted against the Light Blues playing in their league after the club was liquidated. One of the other two were Rangers (Old) who voted to let Rangers (New) into the league. It is unusual for the media to reference this event as it is the one thing that blows the whole 'same club' argument out of the water. To be honest, Mr Monkey, it's rather more blatant than that - they state explicitly and correctly that the club was liquidated! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 So Wiggy Milne wants Rangers 'back' and states Scottish football is poorer without us in the top tier. How can anyone find this objectionable? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 So Wiggy Milne wants Rangers 'back' and states Scottish football is poorer without us in the top tier. How can anyone find this objectionable? No one. But find me two people that would say das Chris will appear with the right approach ... Which negates everything else he said. He hates your mob 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crossbill Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 RedRob72, on 15 Dec 2015 - 18:51, said: "If Rangers come up with the right approach" !!!!? Get tae F*ck ! If you read between the lines, I think this may well have been the sentiment that Milne was trying to convey to Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 So Wiggy Milne wants Rangers 'back' and states Scottish football is poorer without us in the top tier. How can anyone find this objectionable? As your punctuation suggests, it may or may not be seen as objectionable, but unless someone makes an offer for the remains on the liquidators' slab, it is impossible. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 The estimable Peter Houston jumping on the 'back' bandwagon in today's Record: http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/peter-houston-says-falkirk-side-7020618 So one chairman and one manager admitting we should return to the top table and that the first tier is poorer without us. Good to see well-regarded blokes like these having their finger on the pulse of fans' attitudes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 The estimable Peter Houston jumping on the 'back' bandwagon in today's Record: http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/peter-houston-says-falkirk-side-7020618 So one chairman and one manager admitting we should return to the top table and that the first tier is poorer without us. Good to see well-regarded blokes like these having their finger on the pulse of fans' attitudes. Craig Levein's right hand man at Scotland is a clueless idiot? I'd no idea. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stag Nation Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 The estimable Peter Houston jumping on the 'back' bandwagon in today's Record: http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/peter-houston-says-falkirk-side-7020618 So one chairman and one manager admitting we should return to the top table and that the first tier is poorer without us. Good to see well-regarded blokes like these having their finger on the pulse of fans' attitudes. There's probably no denying that the top tier is poorer financially without Rangers, and indeed Hibs. However, isn't that missing the whole point of the league set up? Or indeed of competitive sport at all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 There's probably no denying that the top tier is poorer financially without Rangers, and indeed Hibs. However, isn't that missing the whole point of the league set up? Or indeed of competitive sport at all. Spot on. The only argument for having them in the top flight concerns gross income. The imbalance in the Scottish game means however that in relative terms to the strongest, most clubs would become worse off. When the whole point and appeal, is meant to be competition, that's hardly a good thing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.