Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

cheers mate - disappointed in Thommos reaction though. he's clearly been sold a dummy.

Yeh noticed that. You got more joy out of CelticResearch I think.

I did look for the article in the Sun yesterday when I originally posted about the rumour but it must have been pulled early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sevco fans' optimism is hilarious,

Rangers will go into administration- Not going to read it, it'll never happen.

Rangers will get found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute- Not going to read it, it'll never happen.

Appeal against transfer embargo will be upheld- Not going to read it, it'll never happen.

CVA will be rejected- Not going to read it, it'll never happen.

Sevco application to SPL will be rejected- Not going to read it, it'll never happen.

Parachute to division 1 will be rejected- Not going to read it, it'll never happen.

Spartans will take the empty slot in the senior game-

That pretty much sums up my observations of the deluded ones too!

laugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is from the Clyde statement today 10th July :-

We first concluded that there was limited risk to the SFL from the 'Armageddon' theory, as depicted in the detailed presentation by Neil Doncaster and supported by Stewart Regan, which had prompted fears of cash flow loss to the SFL next season. We have obtained a copy of the Settlement Agreement signed up to by the SPL and the SFL in April 1998 - it is clear that the agreement is not ambiguous in this regard and there is no scope for the SPL to fail to meet the obligations to the SFL except by deliberately breaching the agreement. Neil Doncaster was unequivocal when he said that there would be no payment under the agreement and stressed that it was not the board of the SPL that made big decisions, it was the clubs themselves. We have concluded that it defies credibility that the SPL clubs would instruct the SPL to deliberately breach a legal agreement.

Please Jardine and Lawrie and the rest of our board take note. Well done Clyde.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we're currently sitting at 14-2?

Though Thommo did mention one of the undeclared Clubs would almost 100 percent be another NO. So I make it 15-2. That's job done surely as Sevco needed 16 in favour. Not enough Clubs.

Edited by GunnerBairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though Thommo did mention one of the undeclared Clubs would almost 100 percent be another NO. So I make it 15-2. That's job done surely as Sevco needed 16 in favour. Not enough Clubs.

Not all the clubs marked as no are definite no's though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though Thommo did mention one of the undeclared Clubs would almost 100 percent be another NO. So I make it 15-2. That's job done surely as Sevco needed 16 in favour. Not enough Clubs.

Would imagine Livi would say no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of 28 actually voting - Airdrie abstaining and Dundee seem to have been told not to vote.

Don't we need just one more?

Nope. They're gone on those numbers. 14 voting no would mean a maximum of the other 14 can vote no. And if Dundee can't vote anyway - That's only 13 that can say yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See the Dumbarton guy that said his club losing 300 fans is no big deal in the grander picture, HE IS WRONG, 300*18*£10 =£54,000 away every season, the TV deal will only disappear for a wee while.

Fuckers like you don't give a flying about any of the diddies, you're in your own wee world where only 2 teams are in the clique and only 2 teams should ever be in the clique. Apologies to the decent fans of the Rangers incarnation but this arsehole is exactly the type that has football fans like myself hating the arse cheeks.

If you read what i said 300 sons fans won't influence SPL Chairman to remove their threats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. They're gone on those numbers. 14 voting no would mean a maximum of the other 14 can vote no. And if Dundee can't vote anyway - That's only 13 that can say yes.

Of 30 SFL clubs -

No - 14

Yes - 2

Abstaining - 1

Not allowed - 1

Not yet declared - 12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cheers mate - disappointed in Thommos reaction though. he's clearly been sold a dummy.

I wouldn't be too harsh on Thommo, hasn't made many mistakes, unfortunately it was your club that he chose to make one.

Far rather have him making a similar mistake with regard to Ayr than have virtually no media fighting our corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you read what i said 300 sons fans won't influence SPL Chairman to remove their threats.

That's why I used grander scheme, a club like East Stirling losing 100 fans is like Killie losing 1,000's.

Don't sell the diddy fans short, every one is worth a hundred gloryhunters any day of the week.

Edited by ayrmad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...