kildog Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Firstly -----you might want to take note that it's clubs like Killie that are pushing for Rangers to be in Div 1 not Rangers. We don't want your pishy Div1 we want clubs to die and fast, we'll take div3 anyday of the week. Secondly---- Killie wont goto into Administartion it will be Liquidation off the bat, assets will be sold to the highest bidder and it's likely rugby park will be a tesco or asda in 12 months. Lloyds won't take any hits for the spl clubs as they are owed huge amounts. MJ knows the crap is about to hit the fan, this was his reply to one of your fellow fans in an E-mail, take note of the first line.... Thirdly ---- There is no "Rangers" and there will be no football played an Ibrox stadium next season. They cheated, then they died. Tragic tale. There should be a book soon, maybe you can ask your Mum to get you it for Christmas. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyrshireTon Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 This may well have been posted before - but it's a rundown of clubs voting intentions to date - Berwick one is out of date as they are a definite "No" as of this evening. Voting intentions clicky. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marty_j Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 My Mr McC, you have been a busy little tweeter Well done Sir!!!! cheers mate - disappointed in Thommos reaction though. he's clearly been sold a dummy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordieBoy80 Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Rumours or any substance to back this No substance that I can actually reveal in the public domain 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 No substance that I can actually reveal in the public domain Are you Bomber Brown in disguise? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drooper Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 This may well have been posted before - but it's a rundown of clubs voting intentions to date - Berwick one is out of date as they are a definite "No" as of this evening. Voting intentions clicky. So we're currently sitting at 14-2? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordieBoy80 Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Are you Bomber Brown in disguise? I've already said that I barely drink so I can't be 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 cheers mate - disappointed in Thommos reaction though. he's clearly been sold a dummy. Yeh noticed that. You got more joy out of CelticResearch I think. I did look for the article in the Sun yesterday when I originally posted about the rumour but it must have been pulled early. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 One thing that's certain, Gio is an alpha troll. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyrshireTon Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 So we're currently sitting at 14-2? Out of 28 actually voting - Airdrie abstaining and Dundee seem to have been told not to vote. Don't we need just one more? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killingfloorman Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 cheers mate - disappointed in Thommos reaction though. he's clearly been sold a dummy. Not the first time - remember the fake leggo account? He gets caught up in his own hype. I guess this time he got it wrong. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itwiznaeme Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Sevco fans' optimism is hilarious, Rangers will go into administration- Not going to read it, it'll never happen. Rangers will get found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute- Not going to read it, it'll never happen. Appeal against transfer embargo will be upheld- Not going to read it, it'll never happen. CVA will be rejected- Not going to read it, it'll never happen. Sevco application to SPL will be rejected- Not going to read it, it'll never happen. Parachute to division 1 will be rejected- Not going to read it, it'll never happen. Spartans will take the empty slot in the senior game- That pretty much sums up my observations of the deluded ones too! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sons superhero Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 And this is from the Clyde statement today 10th July :- We first concluded that there was limited risk to the SFL from the 'Armageddon' theory, as depicted in the detailed presentation by Neil Doncaster and supported by Stewart Regan, which had prompted fears of cash flow loss to the SFL next season. We have obtained a copy of the Settlement Agreement signed up to by the SPL and the SFL in April 1998 - it is clear that the agreement is not ambiguous in this regard and there is no scope for the SPL to fail to meet the obligations to the SFL except by deliberately breaching the agreement. Neil Doncaster was unequivocal when he said that there would be no payment under the agreement and stressed that it was not the board of the SPL that made big decisions, it was the clubs themselves. We have concluded that it defies credibility that the SPL clubs would instruct the SPL to deliberately breach a legal agreement. Please Jardine and Lawrie and the rest of our board take note. Well done Clyde. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBairn Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 (edited) So we're currently sitting at 14-2? Though Thommo did mention one of the undeclared Clubs would almost 100 percent be another NO. So I make it 15-2. That's job done surely as Sevco needed 16 in favour. Not enough Clubs. Edited July 10, 2012 by GunnerBairn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz FFC Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 If Rangers were "the people" what are sevco? The fuckwits? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattBairn Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Though Thommo did mention one of the undeclared Clubs would almost 100 percent be another NO. So I make it 15-2. That's job done surely as Sevco needed 16 in favour. Not enough Clubs. Not all the clubs marked as no are definite no's though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz FFC Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Though Thommo did mention one of the undeclared Clubs would almost 100 percent be another NO. So I make it 15-2. That's job done surely as Sevco needed 16 in favour. Not enough Clubs. Awwww, shame 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punk_dfc Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Though Thommo did mention one of the undeclared Clubs would almost 100 percent be another NO. So I make it 15-2. That's job done surely as Sevco needed 16 in favour. Not enough Clubs. Would imagine Livi would say no. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanco Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 No substance that I can actually reveal in the public domain Reveal it using RM code and inserting h as the second letter of evey word and no-one will ever know. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draup Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Out of 28 actually voting - Airdrie abstaining and Dundee seem to have been told not to vote. Don't we need just one more? Nope. They're gone on those numbers. 14 voting no would mean a maximum of the other 14 can vote no. And if Dundee can't vote anyway - That's only 13 that can say yes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.