Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

He posted a query based on a misapprehension. You were able to read what he said, consider it and put him right. That's as it should be.

As far as I'm aware though, Wunf isn't one of the fabled bloggers who ripped off miners, write for the IRA or came up short as a Social Worker.

I'd suggest that always dismissing everything these guys say, without actually addressing the content of it, is unwise.

Wunf is a decent poster and I am always happy to exchange views with him - same as I am with you. In this case he got it wrong and that's ok.

In the case of the Tweeter who thinks CW owns Ibrox? How can anyone take that seriously? There is no back-up or substantiation to this.......just as so many Tweeters and blogger got it wrong re HMRC and LNS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I theoretically fucked Sandra Bullock last night then rolled over and gave Tilda Swinton. a right doing.

Well I didn't theoretically burn my shares in the dead club but they are toast......but theoretically I probably still got them.

And is ahmed not his right name ? Lol.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wunf is a decent poster and I am always happy to exchange views with him - same as I am with you. In this case he got it wrong and that's ok.

In the case of the Tweeter who thinks CW owns Ibrox? How can anyone take that seriously? There is no back-up or substantiation to this.......just as so many Tweeters and blogger got it wrong re HMRC and LNS.

Well then we agree.

I'd disagree however, with your earlier suggestion that Bloggers and Tweeters are always wrong. Very often they're not and their output needs judged on its own merits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wunf is a decent poster and I am always happy to exchange views with him - same as I am with you. In this case he got it wrong and that's ok.

In the case of the Tweeter who thinks CW owns Ibrox? How can anyone take that seriously? There is no back-up or substantiation to this.......just as so many Tweeters and blogger got it wrong re HMRC and LNS.

Sound...fair cop.....anglicisation ahmad.....and craigy spelt his many ways.....

though point re green going and aim notification stands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa horsey.....

Just realising I AM one of those shareholders the feckers ruined.

My parents died in 1979. My dad was uber fecking hoon. Both my brothers and my sister couldn't care less re footie so though my inheritance was kept till majority, the shares came to me. And after a kicking from my orangey friends in my village after the battle of hampden , I burnt the certificate in front of them.

Yowsers. I am now on the level of gio d stef.

Thieving feckers owe me coin :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sound...fair cop.....anglicisation ahmad.....and craigy spelt his many ways.....

though point re green going and aim notification stands.

regarding Craigy? I guess Shyte and Shite are the same.

The AIM point isn't valid. Ahmad (see how I spelt that) wasn't on the PLC board so no need for anything to be declared to the AIM. Did you miss this first time round?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa horsey.....

Just realising I AM one of those shareholders the feckers ruined.

My parents died in 1979. My dad was uber fecking hoon. Both my brothers and my sister couldn't care less re footie so though my inheritance was kept till majority, the shares came to me. And after a kicking from my orangey friends in my village after the battle of hampden , I burnt the certificate in front of them.

Yowsers. I am now on the level of gio d stef.

Thieving feckers owe me coin :D

Bereavement. victimisation and entitlement all in one short post? The perfect Plastic model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

regarding Craigy? I guess Shyte and Shite are the same.

The AIM point isn't valid. Ahmad (see how I spelt that) wasn't on the PLC board so no need for anything to be declared to the AIM. Did you miss this first time round?

Nope. I didn't.

But who knows what the new club will announce 5 months late to the aim...... not exactly played by the rules over disclosures and directors have they ?

Genuine question kincardine.

What position did ahmad have, who told you this and have they misled you before ......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bereavement. victimisation and entitlement all in one short post? The perfect Plastic model.

You forgot religion.....coont baptised me in the wee free ffs........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wunf is a decent poster and I am always happy to exchange views with him - same as I am with you. In this case he got it wrong and that's ok.

In the case of the Tweeter who thinks CW owns Ibrox? How can anyone take that seriously? There is no back-up or substantiation to this.......just as so many Tweeters and blogger got it wrong re HMRC and LNS.

So what evidence have you seen re who owns what ?

Zip....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wunf is a decent poster and I am always happy to exchange views with him - same as I am with you. In this case he got it wrong and that's ok.

In the case of the Tweeter who thinks CW owns Ibrox? How can anyone take that seriously? There is no back-up or substantiation to this.......just as so many Tweeters and blogger got it wrong re HMRC and LNS.

CW won't own Ibrox's assets seeing as he lost the assets in the first place and would be considered fraud buying them back at a knock down price surely.

As for the BTC & the LNS I think it's safe to say even the Rangers fans were a mile off on the final outcomes themselves and had prepared for doom and gloom.The BTC looked a sure certainty against the club after there was a case to answer for and the LNS !!! Rangers fans were bleating it was a kangaroo court to strip the club of titles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CW won't own Ibrox's assets seeing as he lost the assets in the first place and would be considered fraud buying them back at a knock down price surely.

As for the BTC & the LNS I think it's safe to say even the Rangers fans were a mile off on the final outcomes themselves and had prepared for doom and gloom.The BTC looked a sure certainty against the club after there was a case to answer for and the LNS !!! Rangers fans were bleating it was a kangaroo court to strip the club of titles.

Eh, did LNS not find ​oldco guilty of incorrectly registering players over an 11 year period.

Amusing that some sevconians now consider this a victory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, did LNS not find ​oldco guilty of incorrectly registering players over an 11 year period.

Amusing that some sevconians now consider this a victory.

Yes they did AB but fucking failed to act appropriately to remove them titles because the orcs would have went on the rampage.I can't understand how they couldn't void them titles and cups simply because they apparently didn't catch them in the act at the time :blink: .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, did LNS not find ​oldco guilty of incorrectly registering players over an 11 year period.

Amusing that some sevconians now consider this a victory.

Yes they did AB but fucking failed to act appropriately to remove them titles because the orcs would have went on the rampage.I can't understand how they couldn't void them titles and cups simply because they apparently didn't catch them in the act at the time :blink: .

You mean they did gain an advantage by these improperly registered players but not enough to win them the league or the cups?

Maybe LNS outcome not to remove them was 'an admin error'

But that won't be the biggest admin error to affect rangers.. Pretty sure d&p made a fair few

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All lies from bigots and bampots and timmy trying to kick ra peepul when they are down. Nothing to see here, move along :1eye

The rangers supporters reactions as stated above are understandable, because none of them can come up with a viable argument against the rumours, heresay and "eventual" facts spouted by some conspiracy theorists. All they ever do is slag/defelect/abuse until they feel self-satisfied that they have kept the flag flying for one more day.

Why are they bothering anyway when people write supposition/theories on blogs. They keep telling us that the club and company are different entities and that anything that affects the company will not affect the team on the pitch (aye, right!). :1eye

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sevco article from 'City Slicker' in Private Eye. Crooks charter.

34dpkra.jpg

2emcuad.jpg

307ucyp.jpg

That Whyte and Earley have apparently been raping pension funds comes as no surprise.

What's really disgraceful is that articles like this are appearing a London based magazine. How inept are the MSM? Surely it's about time our fat doughnut eating, idle b*****d "investigative" journo's got off their arses and actually did their jobs.

I don't believe there is any sort of conspiracy of silence. I just think the MSM are lazy b*****ds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

D's & P's still seething over LNS

Pleasing.

The topic only came up because Bennett told a barefaced lie about my reaction to the results of the investigation.

Don't compound his lie by joining in snidely with the aftermath Ted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...