Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

That is one of your favourite tactics, Vicky, I agree. Your attitude towards certain religious sects and nationalities plants you firmly in that particular pigeonhole, however.

Oh, sorry, you reckon I'm deflecting? Or Dave? From what, exactly?

I'm certainly not deflecting. I reckon Bendarroch and Tedi are both lying when they talk of their "discovery" of P&B. Oh, look. I've said it again. Notice the construction of that statement.

I also reckon you have a shaky grasp of the English language. A quick perusal of the last dozen or so posts is all the evidence we need on that score for now, but I'm sure you'll provide more later.

I see the issue here: you're employing facts and reasoned debate in a discussion with Bennett. You'd be as well talking to my dog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:

Did yer wee spy-gang write that up for you, WKR? Did they, aye? WKR then, WKR now, WKR forever.

Next we'll have the rest of the Frihill gang on backing Norm and Jim jones up...

I'm not too sure, but I think I can see a pattern developing here.

p.s. Where's Frihill?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not too sure, but I think I can see a pattern developing here.

p.s. Where's Frihill?

At a guess, somewhere near Stavanger ?

You are quoting Benny, so that's my effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably worth noting that Walter Smith's interviews today are flat admissions that Rangers old and new feel/felt so entitled to success that it's impossible for them to run a sustainable business.

This is, by the way, indentical to the analysis of half the folk on this thread. Good to have you on board, Mr Smith.

Now, I wonder how Berrz of the Bendarroch type are going to square this with their Just Wait Til We're Pumping You 7-0 Again patter? After all, when even Smith is openly admitting that Rangers can't survive without unforeseen cash windfalls, it doesn't look like those houndings of SPFL sides will be coming any time soon.

Edited by flyingrodent
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bendarroch, on 08 Oct 2013 - 15:28, said:Posted Image

 

If your argument is that more popular things / institutions are inherently better than less popular ones, let's see how your theory works with a subject less controversial and divisive than Scottish Football, such as world religion:

 

The CIA's World Factbook gives the world (July 2012 est.) distribution of religions as:

 

Christian 31.59% (of which Roman Catholic 18.85%, Protestant 8.15%, Orthodox 4.96%, Anglican 1.26%)

Muslim 23.2%

Hindu 15.0%

Buddhist 7.1%

Sikh 0.35%

Jewish 0.2%

Baha'i 0.11%

other religions 10.95%

non-religious 9.66%

atheists 2.01%

 

Despite a CoS upbringing, I regard myself as thoroughly atheist and, despite atheism's diddy status (there are but a 'tawdry few' of us, plus Richard Dawkins), I'm pretty sure I'm right in what 'team' I support.

 

]

Excellent, we atheists are a minority religious group.

Should we start banging on about how poorly treated we were in the past? Or should we just keep thinking about how dumb everyone else is for letting faerie stories rule their lives?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's right WKR - just like you returning time and again to darkhead - back!

honestly? You've had months of "back?" taunting you, and this is the best you have come up with as a retort?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not into draw fixing normally..................buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuutttt.

Maybe it's time we gave the little shits a wee away day against Celtic in the Scottish Cup ?

A very public arse pumping (of the footballing kind - already been financially raped)Their fans disgracing themselves and maybe, just maybe the SFA chumps suddenly realising it's probably NOT worth rewriting rules to sustain their existence.

Now THAT would be worth 500 million viewers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not into draw fixing normally..................buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuutttt. Maybe it's time we gave the little shits a wee away day against Celtic in the Scottish Cup ? A very public arse pumping (of the footballing kind - already been financially raped)Their fans disgracing themselves and maybe, just maybe the SFA chumps suddenly realising it's probably NOT worth rewriting rules to sustain their existence.Now THAT would be worth 500 million viewers

For sheer comedy, I'd have thought an embarrassingly one-sided walloping off Aberdeen would be even funnier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Struth - The Boss, Book Launch

The book is priced at £20

A market to be fleeced ..... not even the customary £19.99 to make it appear cheaper ... :lol: :lol: :lol:

They missed a trick to sell many more at £18.72 Dhenny :lol: .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chico and tom English crossing swords over the cardigans role in this on radio shortbread :) feckin great.

Chico full of "sir Walter is a good guy", English "eh, really"......and his article tomorrow is meant to rip into the brogue wearing goat fecker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chico and tom English crossing swords over the cardigans role in this on radio shortbread :) feckin great.

Chico full of "sir Walter is a good guy", English "eh, really"......and his article tomorrow is meant to rip into the brogue wearing goat fecker.

Ye back on the liquor, waffle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is one of your favourite tactics, Vicky, I agree. Your attitude towards certain religious sects and nationalities plants you firmly in that particular pigeonhole, however.

Oh, sorry, you reckon I'm deflecting? Or Dave? From what, exactly?

I'm certainly not deflecting. I reckon Bendarroch and Tedi are both lying when they talk of their "discovery" of P&B. Oh, look. I've said it again. Notice the construction of that statement.

I also reckon you have a shaky grasp of the English language. A quick perusal of the last dozen or so posts is all the evidence we need on that score for now, but I'm sure you'll provide more later.

Tedi also admitted that he joined because we were all saying bad things about his club so thought he'd even up the scales by defending his fellow chums :blink: .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Further to King, a reprise of a post from July last year on the spiv....(from tsfm)

Brogan Rogan Trevino and Hogan supports Kano 1000 on 26 July, 2012 at 12:52 said:Good Afternoon,........King arrived in South Africa in 1976 having been transferred there by his then employers- The Weir Group- Jim McColl.He eventually strikes out on his own and by 2000 has made more than a few quid but has tax issues.He has retained his affection for Rangers, and is persuaded by Murray ( alledgedly ) to invest the £20M in the Rangers share issue of that time– Rangers having severe debt problems at the time. So let’s get this straight here. King, a shrewd businessman with tax troubles, spends £20M in return for which he gets a minority shareholding in Rangers PLC and a non executive Directorship at the club.Pause there: If £20M gets you a very minor shareholding just how did Murray- and more importantly King- value the club? Remember King still had this shareholding when the company went into Admin in February this year.Not long after King invests his £20M, the annual accounts for Rangers show a trading loss for the previous year of £16.3M.Yet, in separate papers produced by King, he claims to have received the equivalent of roughly £15.75M by way of income from Rangers PLC for the period ending 2001? Eh- he only arrived in 2000!Note– this is not repayment of a loan, nor is it money for the sale of his shares ( which he still has ) nor to my knowledge is it a dividend on the shares– everyone else who was a Rangers shareholder must have received an equivalent amount so this would run to tens of Millions, and as a dividend can only be paid out of “profits” the sum is a total mystery.Further, as pointed out in Paul McConville’s blog ( a nod and more in that direction ) it is unclear whether this sum was received by King net of tax or gross. If it was net of tax, then King didn’t receive £15m- he actually received £25M.So– here you have a guy with major tax issues in South Africa, with assets frozen including planes and so on, who has “access” to a large sum through a company. He sticks £20M into Rangers PLC in 2000 but by 2001 he has received back either £15M net or £25M gross– but he keeps his shares and Directorship?Mmmmm? Is it all making sense to you?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chico and tom English crossing swords over the cardigans role in this on radio shortbread :) feckin great.

Chico full of "sir Walter is a good guy", English "eh, really"......and his article tomorrow is meant to rip into the brogue wearing goat fecker.

Not surprised - in any other country, interviews like the ones Smith did today would have headlines like "Clueless Walter Doesn't Know What's Happening, Predicts Catastrophe"; "Confused Ex-Chairman Pleads Ignorance, Incompetence" and "Smith: I Got Paid £50k For Nothing While Crooks Flushed New Club Down The Cludgie".

Unsurprising to see Chick still sooking up to Smith, though. Good old Walter could pump Chick's Mrs and kick his dug, and Young would still defend him to the death.

Edited by flyingrodent
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...