kildog Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Rangers didn't die! because Celtic and paedos! Cheats! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 ladies and gentlemen i present the representative answer from the massive celtic support spokes person. well done sir on that intelligent witty and thoughtful reply. I thought it was funny. Not original, but funny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 (edited) because you say so? now after 2 years of this and so many blogs and articles with so much conversation and debating over the subject 5793 pages and you still cannot come up with conclusive evidence every time this subject is raised. what was the point in the bralt lasting this long? you might struggle to get you head around this but i'm staunchly impartial and what i have read over the last few months is opinions and they on the whole when relevant have been interesting, but this is a tangled mess and maybe it isn't relevant any more whether rangers are or are not the same club and have a 142 year or a 2 year history what is more important is where the club is now. Chucky should have renamed Sevco 'Tangled Mess F.C' Edited August 13, 2014 by Ken Fitlike 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 utterly biased simpleton claiming to be impartial and everyone who disagrees with him is biased...... at least 'snafu' chose an approriate user name 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityDave Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Absolutely. Any organisation that covers up and continues to cover child sex abuse should be outed and condemned by all Do you mean the Catholic Church or do you mean Celtic Boys Club? Still, its not a relevant subject to be taken up on this thread. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Jesus guys. It was bad enough that we went back to new club/old club stuff, but this descent into what Big Jock may have known, accompanied by spurious mention of Gough is just ridiculous. We're better than this, surely. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenockRover Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 (edited) Jesus guys. It was bad enough that we went back to new club/old club stuff, but this descent into what Big Jock may have known, accompanied by spurious mention of Gough is just ridiculous. We're better than this, surely. Agreed. Take this pish to the Celtic/Rangers Thread, where it undeniably belongs. Snuffles is one of the unquestioning 'believers' in the SFA propogated myth of continuation to which various agencies also gave acquiescence solely because the SFA wishes it to be so for future benefit to themselves......... as has been said many many times already. For EVRYONE else in the wider Scottish Football Community............. well, pick a name other than Rangers F.C. really. Edit: Trying to spell before finishing my coffee - schoolboy error. Edited August 13, 2014 by GreenockRover 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Agreed. Take this pish to the Celtic/Rangers Thread, where it undeniably belongs. Snuffles is one of the unquestioning 'believers' in the SFA propogated myth of continuation to which various agencies also gave acquiescence solely because the SFA wishes it to be so for future benefit to themselves......... as has been said many many times already. For EVRYONE else in the wider Scottish Football Community............. well, pick a name other than Rangers F.C. really. Edit: Trying to spell before finishing my coffee - schoolboy error. Right i get it now. Rangers are the same club to everybody but the haters in Scottish Football. Why couldn't you have just said this 5000 odd pages ago. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Do you mean the Catholic Church or do you mean Celtic Boys Club? Still, its not a relevant subject to be taken up on this thread. I mean any organisation...any individual. I don't think i can be any clearer on that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Right i get it now. Rangers are the same club to everybody but the haters in Scottish Football. Why couldn't you have just said this 5000 odd pages ago. Nut mun. Same club with broken historical timeline. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Jesus guys. It was bad enough that we went back to new club/old club stuff, but this descent into what Big Jock may have known, accompanied by spurious mention of Gough is just ridiculous. We're better than this, surely. Yeh because everything ever discussed on this thread has been related to the OP. It should be discussed and not covered up and ignored. Surely we are better than that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 (edited) Nut mun. Same club with broken historical timeline. OK. How does the timeline thingy work? ETA ... Remember i have paid little attention to this subject and Tedi usually loses me after about two minutes when discussing this. To me i am happy enough to believe Rangers are the same club and for you to believe whatever you want. Edited August 13, 2014 by No8. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Yeh because everything ever discussed on this thread has been related to the OP. It should be discussed and not covered up and ignored. Surely we are better than that. I agree that it should be discussed but where in context and not as a means of deflections or whataboutery. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 I agree that it should be discussed but where in context and not as a means of deflections or whataboutery. Again i agree with that. Maybe not the right time and place but it was the Partick Thistle supporters holier than thou attitude that irked me yesterday. He claims Bennett is point scoring by mentioning it then hands out dots FFS ... Too many people are willing to turn a blind eye to the scandal. Thankfully Fergus McCann didn't or it might never have come to court!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 OK. How does the timeline thingy work? ETA ... Remember i have paid little attention to this subject and Tedi usually loses me after about two minutes when discussing this. To me i am happy enough to believe Rangers are the same club and for you to believe whatever you want. Tedi loses himself after 30 seconds. You are correct it is down to personal belief because the definition of a club has been changed, unofficially, to that of an entity which only exists in the mind. You cannot liquidate an idea. I suppose it's a branch of solipsism. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Again i agree with that. Maybe not the right time and place but it was the Partick Thistle supporters holier than thou attitude that irked me yesterday. He claims Bennett is point scoring by mentioning it then hands out dots FFS ... Too many people are willing to turn a blind eye to the scandal. Thankfully Fergus McCann didn't or it might never have come to court!! It was your making a joke about child abuse that irked me, benny I expect to be an idiot. If I upset you by pointing out your scumminess - good. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 OK. How does the timeline thingy work? ETA ... Remember i have paid little attention to this subject and Tedi usually loses me after about two minutes when discussing this. To me i am happy enough to believe Rangers are the same club and for you to believe whatever you want. For your purposes, it doesn't. There isn't a break in continuity, there's an overlap. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 For your purposes, it doesn't. There isn't a break in continuity, there's an overlap. According to the CAS there is a break in continuity under UEFA rules if a club uses the newco route to shed debt, including social taxes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 According to the CAS there is a break in continuity under UEFA rules if a club uses the newco route to shed debt, including social taxes. 'but..... but...... it was the company etc etc' 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abhoyforlife Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 RFC 1872 entered into administration on feb14 2012, they never came out of administration, cos they were LIQUIDATED, NEWCO formed and now play under TRIFC fact 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.