Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

A bit more sole. Or are Rangers on their uppers?

So tongue in cheek. But we really shouldn't mock-as-in speak ill of the dead.

What, you providing evidence to support your claims?

In fairness the last thing this thread needs, is facts. Broad sweeping statements fueled by ignorance awra-way boys. That's the ticket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The BBC report Whytes a crook - banned, report sectarian arrests at Easter road - banned.

That's only a half-truth, Cal.

Rangers - The Inside Story was well received down Govan way and showed Whyte as the charlatan that he is.

Now while I eschew bannings et al I do think there is a case to be made against BBC Scotland. In general, it does not serve the football fan well. Their budget is (relatively) large but I cant think of many of their journalists and reporters who can actually asses a game and report back in a cogent and insightful manner.

I also have doubts that match-reporting is really that important to them nor is reporting on Scottish football on broad scale.

What Pacific Quay does seem to revel in is gossip, innuendo and tattle-tales. This, for me, is exactly what I don't want from a national broadcaster.

The trouble, and the barrier to improving The BBC, is that too many P&B posters revel in exactly what Pacific Quay purveys. Gossip, innuendo and tattle-tales. The stock in trade of both The Beeb and The P&B Diddy.

Edited by The_Kincardine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were the arrests at Easter road just a rumour? And for FFS kinky, the BBC have a much, much stronger editorial standard than any Murdoch outlet or Scottish rag. You just don't like criticism, because you, your fellows and your club are speaking from the weakest of stand points. Knowing something is accurate but not liking it waaaaaah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were the arrests at Easter road just a rumour? And for FFS kinky, the BBC have a much, much stronger editorial standard than any Murdoch outlet or Scottish rag. You just don't like criticism, because you, your fellows and your club are speaking from the weakest of stand points. Knowing something is accurate but not liking it waaaaaah.

This is exactly the reaction I expected from you. You're exhibiting your partiality and superficiality yet again. Let me try and break it down in a way that even you understand,

The reason I don't want the Beeb banned: When Celtic deliver as much gossip as we do The Beeb (and the P&B Diddies) will be all over it. I don't see them as partial but I do see their so-called football reporting pandering to the basest qualities and lapped up by diddies.

The reason I want BBC Scotland improved: They are poor servants of football in Scotland. P&B delivers more about games/teams/clubs/matches than our national broadcaster who seem desperate to become The Dorothy Parker of football rather than serving the fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you're dragging the argument all over the place. You'd be delighted if the coverage was just as poor but was all fluffing pieces about how brilliant ra sevco / ra sellik are.

If it was all wee glasgow nyaff mouth-pieces felating your surrogate ego, like in the bad old days, we wouldn't be hearing a peep about quality of journalism, coverage or reporting on a broad-scale.

The amusing thing is, is that it is exactly that cronyism, that you so long to return to, that led to the ridiculous situation where nobody questioned the establishment club, cheating themselves into the dirt and dragging our game through the gutter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinky, even if the Beeb were to suddenly to admit that they were being a tad biased in their reporting and in future would report R & C's arseholery, would that make Rangers' actions any more acceptable?

Or is this just a case of whataboutery?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason I want BBC Scotland improved: They are poor servants of football in Scotland. P&B delivers more about games/teams/clubs/matches than our national broadcaster who seem desperate to become The Dorothy Parker of football rather than serving the fans.

No, you're dragging the argument all over the place.

I'm not. I'm saying plainly that The BBC shouldn't be banned but should improve in their journalistic standards. This is incontrovertible.

If it was all wee glasgow nyaff mouth-pieces felating your surrogate ego, like in the bad old days, we wouldn't be hearing a peep about quality of journalism, coverage or reporting on a broad-scale.

The amusing thing is, is that it is exactly that cronyism, that you so long to return to, that led to the ridiculous situation where nobody questioned the establishment club, cheating themselves into the dirt and dragging our game through the gutter.

This is a product of your febrile and, I have to say, rather fucked-up mind and please don't try and press your social inadequacies on to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinky, even if the Beeb were to suddenly to admit that they were being a tad biased in their reporting and in future would report R & C's arseholery, would that make Rangers' actions any more acceptable?

Or is this just a case of whataboutery?

Here's the thing, DA: I think we deserve all the pelters we get and haven't accused, ever, The Beeb of partiality.

I do think Scottish football gets a poor service from Pacific Quay but some chunts won't allow me to say that and think I'm accusing The BBC of bias - which I'm not!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the thing, DA: I think we deserve all the pelters we get and haven't accused, ever, The Beeb of partiality.

I do think Scottish football gets a poor service from Pacific Quay but some chunts won't allow me to say that and think I'm accusing The BBC of bias - which I'm not!

Fair dos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...