Jacksgranda Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 I'll be interested to see the detail of this. Today's Scotsman says it will compel outgoing owners to conduct proper diligence into whether the people they're selling to are fit-n-proper or not. It sounds a good idea - but given someone selling is likely leaving Scottish football, how do you subsequently punish them if they don't do it?!?! Force them to come back and take over their old team! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 GO ON THE GERS,,JUST A WEE HICKUP WE ARE GOING THROUGH,, WE WILL BE BACK SOON ,STRONGER , BETTER,SFA ,FIFA CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT ,, RANGERS WILL NEVER DIE,, NEVER EVER. thats a shame as a lot of us really want them to die. and soon cheating tax dodging turnip munching lowlife F$%kwits. sorry my contempt is showing now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 Seriously you diddies are on page 1550 odd and have got nothing right yet. When you stop believing the utter drivel posted by failed social workers and corrupt lawyers you might actually begin to understand the situation. 54 Titles and Still Going downhill Strong fast 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_S_A_R Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 Net spend ? bit of a red herring if you ask me as this doesn't allow for: signing on fee's loyalty pay offs (when a player is sold at the clubs desire) Not to mention that the £9m sale of Hutton to Spurs was allegedly a means of writing off a debt to Daniel Levy's company. that's all true. but those transfers helped them to 3 in a row which got them £30mish from two CL campaigns. a decent investment imo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanco Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 (edited) were the payments into the EBTs recorded as staff costs in the accounts? They are recorded as "contributions to employee trusts" in the "staff costs" section. Edited June 6, 2012 by blanco 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzdrk Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 GO ON THE GERS,,JUST A WEE HICKUP WE ARE GOING THROUGH,, WE WILL BE BACK SOON ,STRONGER , BETTER,SFA ,FIFA CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT ,, RANGERS WILL NEVER DIE,, NEVER EVER. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 Are you sure? Last time I checked the figures they had just 0ver 20% of the debt. That may have been against D&Ps earlier "projections" though Baron Greenback has included the BTC in his CVA proposal and why the HMRC has the power alone to block it and he knows it. He's after a liquidation to buy the newco and make the gers fans pay for his take over shockaroony. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanco Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 that's all true. but those transfers helped them to 3 in a row which got them £30mish from two CL campaigns. a decent investment imo. Makes you wonder why they had to use EBT's in the first place . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 Net spend ? bit of a red herring if you ask me as this doesn't allow for: signing on fee's loyalty pay offs (when a player is sold at the clubs desire) Not to mention that the £9m sale of Hutton to Spurs was allegedly a means of writing off a debt to Daniel Levy's company. And the free move of Andy Webster to Wigan on the basis Rangers would buy him and bring him back to Scotland. Just after the merchandise deal was signed by JJB and Rangers. On loan initially (set up the day after Paul le Quen left) but eventually trasnsferred to Rangers for 'an undisclosed fee'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 from the AGM The Scottish FA also announced a £4.5m increase in turnover for the year to £32.2m, with one third of turnover issued directly to member clubs, an increase on the previous year, when one quarter of the turnover was allocated to members. not all clubs surely. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highland Dogma Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 that's all true. but those transfers helped them to 3 in a row which got them £30mish from two CL campaigns. a decent investment imo. yeah it worked out a treat hence they have no financial issues whatsoever A better way to invest the cash would have been to pay off their debts and live within their means hence avoiding the current clusterfuck...but they chose to in effect spunk the last of the housekeeping money at the casino..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 ALLYMAC, on 06 June 2012 - 15:37, said: GO ON THE GERS,,JUST A WEE HICKUP WE ARE GOING THROUGH,, WE WILL BE BACK SOON ,STRONGER , BETTER,SFA ,FIFA CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT ,, RANGERS WILL NEVER DIE,, NEVER EVER. At 15.36 on 6th June 2012. The big hoose's internet connection must stay open. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 The big hoose's internet connection must stay open. aye if the bills been paid 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 that's all true. but those transfers helped them to 3 in a row which got them £30mish from two CL campaigns. a decent investment imo. fair point........although were they not running at a £10m annual deficit ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 Darwin must be spinning in his grave when it comes to Roasters Posters like ALLYMAC ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Capitan Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 I see they are now planning a pre season jaunt to Germany. Where is this money coming from? Is this the only administration where no one has lost their job? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 according to this their net spend was £9 million that summer you've got to speculate to accumulate though and they did make the group stages of the CL in the two following seasons which they wouldn't have done if they hadn't spent. turning cuellar into bougherra, mendes and davis was great business. OK I was wrong they spent well over £18 million then but I didn't factor in the players they sold. But still doesn't exclude the fact they were in HUGE DEBT and trouble was around the corner and didn't prepare for it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 I see they are now planning a pre season jaunt to Germany. Where is this money coming from? Is this the only administration where no one has lost their job? People have lost their jobs and wanting to see people losing their jobs is wrong. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepitsafe Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 OK Welshbairn. Own up you were bored! "ALLYMAC:? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nutz_the_Squirrel Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 People have lost their jobs and wanting to see people losing their jobs is wrong. ^^^^^^^^ Thinking of the tea lady shock-tactic approach IMO. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.