williemillersmoustache Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Are they dead yet? Yes, yes they are. :D :D :D :D :D 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustyarabnuts Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Im a nurse and a mother.. And find this site full of paedophiles.. Not all.. But definitely some.. I'm a female.. And you have your head in the sand awwwww fcuk she still here 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macshimmy Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Sure the SFA could have appealed. I really wish that they did. They may well have won. Call it a 50/50 chance? What is sinister, though, is why they didn't appeal. Had they appealed they'd have faced FIFA's wrath for using 'the civil courts'. Don't you think that is utterly crap? Why can't Scotland's FA and one of Scotland's football clubs use Scotland's legal resources to decide on a procedural disagreement? They had no need to occupy the time of courts which could be dealing with more critical matters. When your club signed up, it agreed to abide by the decisions of the governing body. Thus far in this sorry mess, they have done their best to wipe their arse on the rulebook. I hope they get battered finally into their grave with it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macshimmy Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Im a nurse and a mother.. And find this site full of paedophiles.. Not all.. But definitely some.. I'm a female.. And you have your head in the sand Nah, you're a troll. No gender. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herman Hessian Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 So when Rangers go to the 3rd division, where's the money going to come from to maintain Ibrox and Murray Park? Can't imagine that season ticket sales will be able to cover it all at SFL prices. don't forget that the miniscule travelling support of the diddy Div 3 clubs will mean that most of the "away corner" can be signed over to all the new Rangers ST holders who will be showing solidarity with the club and not walking away in their time of crisis - that'll easily make up for the shortfall - there's big money to be made from 50,000 gates against East Stirling, midweek, in February.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Rangers who? :lol: :lol: Exactly. P.S. Interesting that Blanco saw the word "Rangers" and his immediate Pavlovian response was to type "f**k Off". Do they learn this shit in the womb ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 The company wasn't restrained in anyway. They were still able to sign new players to work as footballers - they just weren't allowed to register them with the SFA. The SFA didn't impose the punishment - it was impose and then upheld by two independent panels, each of which contained a judge. The only thing the legal case proved was that one judge disagreed with the other two. Then the SFA should have appealed Lord Glennie's decision. Oh wait it can't because that would have incurred FIFA's wrath for being too reasonable. Serious question - do you think that we were wrong on going to The Court of Session? Do you think it undermines footballing authority? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Im a nurse and a mother.. And find this site full of paedophiles.. Not all.. But definitely some.. I'm a female.. And you have your head in the sand ^^^^^^^^^ Tarrier IMO ^^^^^^^^^ HAW HAW you are unbelievably shit at trolling Is there any chance you will ever have an alias account that isn't called 'something' bear? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Exactly. P.S. Interesting that Blanco saw the word "Rangers" and his immediate Pavlovian response was to type "f**k Off". Do they learn this shit in the womb ? I've got my greenies back! Have a Hughie for a pisspoor, antediluvian gag delivered in impeccable style with superb timing. BTW, Pavlov's dogs? Terriers Tarriers! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caff Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 1339626833[/url]' post='6333458']Then the SFA should have appealed Lord Glennie's decision. Oh wait it can't because that would have incurred FIFA's wrath for being too reasonable. Serious question - do you think that we were wrong on going to The Court of Session? Do you think it undermines footballing authority? Yes and yes. Whether intentional or not, it came across as two fingers to the rest of Scottish football and a continuation of the 'We arra peepul' attitude. And at a time when your club could have done with all the sympathy and allies it could muster. It shot itself in the foot. Just watch Gilmour's interview after the SPL meeting. I'd imagine that summed up a lot of fan's opinion. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herman Hessian Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 "Rangers"...Pavlovian response fresh fruit and meringue when rangers die ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenlantern Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I'm a anthropologist, and after much observation, this thread is funny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Rangers entered that private club in full knowledge that their contract forbade them from pursuing internal matters of compliance through the courts. It's not like they just ticked a license box on a website to get in. That said, there is no fixed penalty for pursuing matters outside of court, and that is presumably precisely because it is occasionally the right thing to do. On this occasion it was outright counterproductive given the strong indication from the tribunal that the transfer ban was a novel attempt to come up with a severe punishment that fell short of yanking Rangers' membership entirely. I agree that it looks like being counterproductive. Don't you think, though, that this 'ma baw ma game' attitude is shite? As The Hibs fan said earlier, "the SFA rules ostensibly say you can't appeal the tribunal itself, and thus both CAS + CoS were debarred... which in cases where it's SFA itself imposing a punishment means it's not possible to get a hearing off a 3rd party. That, in turn, isn't really very just." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomogganners Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) £134mil debt is only 446,666667 irn bru glass cheques, if 40,000 fans took their share of it each then its only 11167 bottles per person or 306 bottles a day each for a year............................................not a lot of folk knew that Edited June 13, 2012 by Bloomogganners 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herman Hessian Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 To be honest dont give a monkeys.. But anyone on your thread who gets excited by 11 year olds giving birth should be hung.. Its obscene not really - it's childbirth - entirely natural; you could argue, in this instance, that the act of conception was a bit dubious, mind... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanco Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Exactly. P.S. Interesting that Blanco saw the word "Rangers" and his immediate Pavlovian response was to type "f**k Off". Do they learn this shit in the womb ? well you did ring the bell 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macshimmy Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Speaking of getting battered into their grave with the rulebook, I think Green may just have blown off their other foot with the second barrel: PFA Scotland chief executive Fraser Wishart said: “The European Court of Justice ruling in the case of Bosman is authority for the view that professional footballers are workers like anyone else and are entitled to exercise their right to freedom of movement when out of contract. Our legal team considers that legal remedies are open to a player in the event of registration being withheld, including the right to petition the Court of Session for a fast track Judicial Review Hearing. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/rangers/9329513/Rangers-in-crisis-SFA-asks-Fifa-to-rule-on-status-of-newco-players.html Looks like you'll be using Scotland's legal resources to decide on a procedural disagreement there then 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 There is a thread on Follow Follow where a poster thinks we should show some humility...3 pages of the usual abuse with this one being my favourite.. 'humility ???open yer eyes to whats happening to our club,, those bastids want us dead,, its your fckn attitude thats got us into this fckn mess,, i wouldnt give ANY of them the steam off my shit after this season,,, and im not appologising for anything,,, i want to watch every last one go under one by one. fck that' Nothing like proving the OPs point 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broccoli Dog Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Aye that's exactly what it's like. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martian86 Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Will the admins get round to removing the option of 'Rangers' as a poster's team soon? It might help the hvns on here move on... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.