Doink Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 How is Ally's war chest going? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) but thats where the law and common justice dont always meet. the idea that the last guy to decide something must be right.... 3 independent guys, none of them judges mind you, but 1 a top qc read those rules and thought they were allowed to create their own punishment. 3 other independent guys, one of them a judge, read the rules and agreed. 1 guy, a judge of no greater importance or experience or reputation, disagreed. result, 6 1 to team yay and yet team nay wins. of course the SFA could have appealed the CoS judgement, and by the law of averages, bearing in mind 6 people have said yay and 1 nay, one could guess they would have won, but that would also break FIFA guidelines. Only grey area is the fact the SFA rules ostensibly say you can't appeal the tribunal itself, and thus both CAS + CoS were debarred... which in cases where it's SFA itself imposing a punishment means it's not possible to get a hearing off a 3rd party. That, in turn, isn't really very just. Of course a legitimate counter is why Rangers went running to CoS, opposed to CAS. Ultimately, stepping aside from the particular case in question for a moment, the obvious solution going forward is to reinforce in SFA rules the avenue to CAS. It'd also be positive if CAS speeded-up when considering minor cases, but that's a bigger issue. Edited June 13, 2012 by HibeeJibee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p&b is a disgrace Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) According to the groomers website.. They all say that.. A mother at fecking 11.. You are a paedophile.. The Moderators should kick you out.. suggesting an 11 year olds a mother.. You are sick and should be booted from this forum.. Is that your final, final, final post? Are you Nurse Hoddit? Edited June 13, 2012 by p&b is a disgrace 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1962bairn Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 1339625188[/url]' post='6333335']Welcome - decent first post that sums it up for me. Now. You're not another nurse are you? Thanks for the welcome No. I'm a bean counter. Unfortunately not on the insolvency side as i would like to know the legal position re Greens proposed takeover. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caff Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 1339625656[/url]' post='6333382']That really doesn't matter. Why is football so fucking precious? Why are you yet another 'civi court' lickspittle? The SFA have a process and the Court of Session - with no football bias or prejudice - found that process lacking. This should be something we all celebrate. The bad thing for Rangers may well be expulsion. The good thing for sane people is that football authorities are held to account. I don't think you know the meaning of the word lickspittle. it means being obsequious to those in power. You're being more of a lickspittle with regards to the CoS than anyone else on here. You're the one inferring that the CoS is the be all and end all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanco Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 That really doesn't matter. Why is football so fucking precious? Why are you yet another 'civi court' lickspittle? The SFA have a process and the Court of Session - with no football bias or prejudice - found that process lacking. This should be something we all celebrate. The bad thing for Rangers may well be expulsion. The good thing for sane people is that football authorities are held to account. If Rangers didn't agree with the authority of an independent panel to impose such sanctions why did they sign up to be bound by it and why didn't they object to it earlier?. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slartibartfast Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 They'll only spin it to being the rightful day of their reformation. :lol: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herman Hessian Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Teebear post pics of your kids, I want to have sex with them all. updated version of broxi for the newco ??? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macshimmy Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Oh did I not say.. Have 3 older children aged 26, 25 and 23.. You seem excited thinking my 11 year old is a mother.. you are actually scary.. are you a paedophile..Passing you details to police Wow it took ages before he brought out the paedo-finder general stuff, I don't think he is from RM after all 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Knock knock. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 of course the SFA could have appealed the CoS judgement, and by the law of averages, bearing in mind 6 people have said yay and 1 nay, one could guess they would have won, but that would also break FIFA guidelines. Sure the SFA could have appealed. I really wish that they did. They may well have won. Call it a 50/50 chance? What is sinister, though, is why they didn't appeal. Had they appealed they'd have faced FIFA's wrath for using 'the civil courts'. Don't you think that is utterly crap? Why can't Scotland's FA and one of Scotland's football clubs use Scotland's legal resources to decide on a procedural disagreement? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p&b is a disgrace Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Knock knock. Who's there? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Who's there? Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broccoli Dog Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 So when Rangers go to the 3rd division, where's the money going to come from to maintain Ibrox and Murray Park? Can't imagine that season ticket sales will be able to cover it all at SFL prices. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanco Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) Rangers. FCUK OFF Edited June 13, 2012 by blanco 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustyarabnuts Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I will close my eyes and count to 10 when I open them,hopefully Teabear will be no more 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 has TB gone?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p&b is a disgrace Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Rangers. Rangers who? :lol: :lol: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Rangers. Ok, rangers who? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Are they dead yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumper Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 The CoS's role was to help The SFA's panel interpret its own rules since it was incapable of doing so itself. That was the angle Paul McBride came from over Lennon's two dugout bans. The difference was that it was pursued through the SFA's own channels. For sane people a civil court is a good thing. It means that there is some sort of accountability and pressure on the SFA to adhere to its own processes. The aforementioned dugout ban appeal seemed to suggest that the SFA could be made accountable without having to resort to the courts. Any idea that 'It's a private club so we can do what we like' just flies in the face of common justice. Rangers entered that private club in full knowledge that their contract forbade them from pursuing internal matters of compliance through the courts. It's not like they just ticked a license box on a website to get in. That said, there is no fixed penalty for pursuing matters outside of court, and that is presumably precisely because it is occasionally the right thing to do. On this occasion it was outright counterproductive given the strong indication from the tribunal that the transfer ban was a novel attempt to come up with a severe punishment that fell short of yanking Rangers' membership entirely. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.