Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

But they can't add amendments without giving 14 days notice

A juggernaut has driven through the rules. These guys are all adults, they will not be stupid enough to be led by the nose by a bunch of incompetent administrators.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yip and I have a bad, bad feeling about this.

Stitch up from very beginning.

The only possible good result for us is that the vote on proposal 2 is taken from the SFL board and passed to the member clubs or the meeting is adjourned with no vote taken.

The latter result would indicate that the SFL board have refused to budge and the clubs won`t permit the stitch up to take place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else feeling genuinely nervous about the vote?

Football's been a huge, huge part of my life for over 25 years now and, with a kid on the way, something I was hoping to take him / her along to. Now it all comes down to today and I'm genuinely feeling worried about the whole thing.

f**k yeah.

I stupidly told the wife if they rigged the game to get Sevco in, I'm walking.

This is a battle for the soul of Saturday Afternoon.

:unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever happens today, tomorrow, next week, or over the coming year or two, one thing is certain.

In 3 or 4 years from now Scottish football supporters who have spent years of their lives and thousand of pounds of their money will still be dealing with the stench that has been created by this fuck up over the last few weeks and months whilst Doncaster and Regan are earning big bucks elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry my mistake. It's 48 hours for an amendment to a resolution. Either way it's too late

As far as I know, Clyde submitted a request for an amendment, and it was going to be discussed at the start of the meeting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old Rangers asked for their SPL share to be transferred to newco. Who would you like to have taken this decision? Cockwomble? The 6 man SPL board? The fact is the SPL HAD to consider this request, they did and 10 of them voted against it.

Correct probably about fifteen hunner pages ago we were up in arms that it wouldn't go to a vote but would be up to the board. It did go to a vote despite the best efforts of doncaster to get it delayed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latest from Alex Thomson - http://blogs.channel...tale-world/2265

I'm wary of taking things at face value, there's usually two sides to a story.

But that is pretty damning if it's true. Regans position is immediatly untenable if this is the case. A total stitch up, and Rod Petrie doesn't look to fantastic either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not true The sfl have followed their rules

As have the SPL.

Not a single rule has been bent so far, and even an SFL1 outcome wouldn't change that.

But the SFL would be going against precedent if they put the Newco anywhere other than SFL3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...