Benjamin_Nevis Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 It's a long thread and I can't be arsed going back through it so I'll explain in this post. Ever since the SFL's vote was announced Claymores and a few others have been on about boycotting the 5 who voted for Sevco to division 1, I think this is totally wrong and have been trying to point out using sarcastic posts that the SFL clubs all sold out to some degree with the exception of one so any boycotting should take place over the 29 clubs who voted for Sevco into the SFL before Spartans and Cove, regardless of which division they accepted Sevco into. If you read posts between my calls for those boycotts you will see the picture, I am all for a clean slate for every single club, including Sevco, now that they have been sent to division 3, Scottish football needs to band together now. Erm, I don't think Spartans or Cove have actually applied in order to be shoved aside to make way for Sevco. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Leighton Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 (edited) Erm, I don't think Spartans or Cove have actually applied in order to be shoved aside to make way for Sevco. Cove Rangers' most recent application was dependent on a new stadium which is currently sunk because of very recently declined planning permission. They lost to Annan iirc by not having the stadium in place. Edited July 15, 2012 by Jim Leighton 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Still trying to figure out if their RFFFFFFFFFF Nevis Climb is to do with them believing it is how you cancel a Sky contract Mountain Rescue will have to get a shot of a fucking Chinook to get those fat c***s off that mountain. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Cove Rangers' most recent application was dependent on a new stadium which is currently sunk because of very recently declined planning permission. They lost to Annan iirc by not having the stadium in place. Aye i saw something earlier in the thread about stadium issues. I would like to have seen Spartans apply however. A well run club, finance in place, youth programme etc and a tidy wee stadium by all accounts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Personally, I don't buy a newspaper anymore - complete waste of money. Best of them out there though, imo, is the Guardian. No argument but for 20 the i isn't bad. (30p on a Saturday, though) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Leighton Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Aye i saw something earlier in the thread about stadium issues. I would like to have seen Spartans apply however. A well run club, finance in place, youth programme etc and a tidy wee stadium by all accounts. Spartans will be a good addition to SFL, suspect they will have to wait for the 'pyramid' though - but it might not be that long a wait. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 You'll be making excuses for the orcs behaviour next. Loony leftie forum for this pish. Fascist. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stagmaster Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 He quotes the Vatican Bank scandal What are the orcs going to make of that? Was Calvi the guy found hanging under a bridge in London with bricks in his pocket. Thought Freemason's were implicated but maybe it was Opus Dei [masked smiley here but don't know how to do it] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanco Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Fascist. Liberal loony. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattBairn Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Erm, I don't think Spartans or Cove have actually applied in order to be shoved aside to make way for Sevco. Only because there was no official space. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itwiznaeme Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 (edited) Coffee break time - This one is for any lurking orcs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ci-Oud2ZM4&feature=player_embedded#! Edited July 15, 2012 by Itwiznaeme 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killingfloorman Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 They should have considered that instead of spending all their time thinking up new ways to "cheat" everyone. Let them worry about it. I'm with you on that. But GD did a good job grounding people before the various votes, i'm just trying to do something similar with regards to this idea. There is more chance of them 'doing a Portsmouth' i.e. various admins, than anything else. Remember, we still don't know who owns Ibrox, MP etc 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 (edited) Erm, I don't think Spartans or Cove have actually applied in order to be shoved aside to make way for Sevco. There was never an open application process solicited. Gretna 2008 also now have a suitable stadium in Raydale Edited July 15, 2012 by kiddy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Coffee break time - This one is for any lurking orcs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_ptPV2Lpds&feature=player_embedded#! do you think some orc will sit and watch all 10 hours. poor fool 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killingfloorman Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Was Calvi the guy found hanging under a bridge in London with bricks in his pocket. Thought Freemason's were implicated but maybe it was Opus Dei [masked smiley here but don't know how to do it] Yes, but they were Catholic freemasons That's like dividing by zero for an orc 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 That's a fair point. We claim Scottish footballing authorities and the Scottish sport media of being Glasgowcentric, being OFcentric is probably more accurate. Correct. The Ugly Sisters just happen(ed) to be based in Glasgow. Don't see the Jags getting special treatment. More's the pity. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itwiznaeme Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 STV: Scottish FA urged to act in row over ex-Rangers players' contracts STV 15 July 2012 16:22 BST Steven Whittaker and Steven Naismith turned down the transfer of their contracts to a newco Rangers.SNS Group The lawyer representing former Rangers players has appealed to the Scottish Football Association to act quickly to allow them to play elsewhere. Players including Steven Naismith, Steven Davis and Kyle Lafferty, who turned down the transfer of their contracts to a newco Rangers, have yet to receive international clearance to play for their new clubs. This is because the governing body has been unable to process the applications due to an objection from those in charge at Ibrox. Charles Green argues that the players were in breach of contract when they joined other clubs, a point of view not shared by PFA Scotland. FIFA are now dealing with the matter, writing to the SFA to request more information. Now Margaret Gribbon, who represents seven of the players, hopes the association can move the process along. She told Press Association Sport: "Following the refusal of the SFA to issue players registrations, the new clubs have all referred the matter to FIFA." "FIFA have now written to the SFA in each case requesting reasons why the players' registrations were blocked." "It remains entirely unclear the facts and matters upon which Rangers oldco and Rangers newco rely in order to support their position that the players acted in breach of contract." "Presumably they have made their reasons known to the SFA and if so, these have not been shared with my law firm, Bridge Litigation, who represent the majority of the players." "FIFA have given the SFA seven days to respond but it is hoped that given the straightforward nature of the request the SFA will be in a position to reply sooner." "We remain confident that FIFA will grant ITC (International Transfer Clearance) enabling the players to continue playing football with their new clubs." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Oh look. The rangurs fans declared that Inverness are £5m in debt. Inverness say we have no debt. Who trusts a rangers fan with money 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 A really good and positive statement from Caley. What the f**k was that pish they came out with on Friday? I'm tempering my optimism slightly until we clear tomorrow, and any knee-jerk out-of-the-box reconstruction plans that (for example) somehow open-up a play-off route for SFL3 champion right back to SPL for 2013-14... ... however, that aside, one presumes Inverness have decided it's best to leave the "make a fool of myself" spotlight to St Mirren. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Oh look. The rangurs fans declared that Inverness are £5m in debt. Inverness say we have no debt. Who trusts a rangers fan with money No, Inverness stated that they had no bank debt. But neither did Rangers prior to liquidation. So no comfort there! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.