SpungoMcGoo Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Each club gets 4% of the Net Commercial Revenues. Then there is a breakdown of top-ups as follows: 1. 13% 2. 11% 3. 5.5% 4. 4.5% 5. 4% 6. 3.5% 7. 3% 8. 2.5% 9. 2% 10. 1.5% 11. 1% 12. 1% One of those must be wrong, because that adds up to 52.5% rather than 52%... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_S_A_R Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 So they "believe" the Ticketus debt is £24m, they "believe" that half of the Jelavic money is somewhere in the club, they don't really know who owns Murray Park or Ibrox, but they are "wholly confident" that Rangers will survive and that liquidation will not be an outcome? f**k me, they'd have been better with Del Boy and Rodney up there, the ticketus debt is nothing to do with the administrators. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdTheDuck Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 One of those must be wrong, because that adds up to 52.5% rather than 52%... 12th get 0.5%, not 1% 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nowhereman Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Reading a wee bit about what Celtic have seemingly said (regarding not needing Rangers), and the financial figures they've posted. Given what is going on there, by all accounts being financially prudent with their projections etc, and when you compare that to the absolute clusterfuck of affairs at Ibrox - then how can anyone come out and say that Celtic are wrong? I know all the nonsense about reduced TV deal, reduced crowds etc etc - but I'll tell you what, if that was to happen, I'd rather have the Celtic boards way of dealing with it (or indeed Motherwell, or St Johnstone) than whats been happening at Ibrox. Team : Livingston. Irony meter: way off the scale 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 All these shenangians with Rangers are certainly showing which fans of smaller clubs have light-blue leanings as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin M Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 the ticketus debt is nothing to do with the administrators. Maybe a daft question - seems strange they would refer to it and the amount if it didn't go through the books (ie not for them to worry about). How would they know about it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreenMonster Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Couldn't make out some of the questions, yet i heard SOCA being mentioned? Think it was somebody from SSN that asked if SOCA were looking into the fact that tax and contributions were taken from workers but not passed on to HMRC 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergie's no1 fan Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 All these shenangians with Rangers are certainly showing which fans of smaller clubs have light-blue leanings as well. Especially the ones with green and white hoops on 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 havent seen the questions being asked as just in from work.but have seen the statement on sky sports news. I see that there is interested parties with a consortium ready to take over. how long was murray trying to punt rangers before whyte took over? (three years ? ) where were these so called money men then. i smell shoite 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Maybe it's just me but I thought the administrators were on a hiding to nothing today. I'm guessing the whole situation is a mess that will take some time to unravel so to come out and either promise that everything will be OK or that the shit has hit the fan would paint them into a corner. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_S_A_R Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Maybe a daft question - seems strange they would refer to it and the amount if it didn't go through the books (ie not for them to worry about). How would they know about it? they said they had been through the books, just not with a fine tooth comb, a £24 million liability would be hard to miss. not to mention you would expect to hear from the mob who it is owed to. i think they probably have a better idea of the bigger picture than they are letting on but they are regulated professionals who are there to do a specific job. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Taxman Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 havent seen the questions being asked as just in from work.but have seen the statement on sky sports news. Basically an advert for the administrators then bullshit way through questions. No new info at all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_S_A_R Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 All these shenangians with Rangers are certainly showing which fans of smaller clubs have light-blue leanings as well. are you talking about me? i definitely don't have any leanings expect claret and amber ones. i do have an intolerance for misinformed stupidity. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 No offence mate, but that's pretty sad you went to that trouble. Yeah, imagine someone actually writing to there MSP about something they feel stronly about rather than only posting shite on a football forum like you do. Fuck off you arsehole. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Why are they hopefully of pushing through a deal for Cousin? A completely unnecessary cost at £7k per week. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 fvck me even administrators and whyte telling different stories now.(couldnt agree on the colour of shite) FREEDOM 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreenMonster Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Breaking news Ticketus money has been found, apparently Craig Whyte went down to Ladbrokes and put it all on Celtic to win the league 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 So have Ticketus been done out of £24million? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 HMRC will NOT cut a deal with Rangers.. Rangers will pay the full amount or they will be liquidated... I think after listening to the administrators that the threat of liquidation is unlikely to happen. Also there is a lot of interest from outside the club for investment. So having the choice of your unqualified opinion or the qualified opinion of the administrator to take into account i think i'll go with the latter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyle Lanley Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Every SPL club should walk away from the SPL and set up their own league and leave the old firm to play in their own league. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.