Jump to content

Latest Polls and Latest Odds


Lex

Recommended Posts

Sigh. What? They publish hundreds of staories every day. Not all of them are repeated.

Newspapers dust off old stories which have already appeared in their publication, or another, and try and pass them off as something fresh and modern.

Private Eye point this out regularly. Both Carl Cort and I know this, as we regularly read the magazine.

Now, if you want to suggest we are both inventing this, then be my guest.

It is common paractice. It's not an anti yes conspiracy it's Shite journalism, which to me in an issue of national importance like this, is no better than if it was deliberate.

Don't attribute to malice that which can be explained by a lazy b*****d hack keen to sign off for his 2pm pint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colkitto, you're embarrassing yourself.

No, he's not. Yes supporters on here barely get an opinion out before H_B starts screaming for evidence. Why is it an issue for him to be asked to back up his assertions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You keep on stating there are numerous examples but can't seem to be able to provide anything specific so far..

Street of Shame is a column that appears every issue in Private Eye - there are always at least a few examples of rehashed stories.

Or are you claiming said column doesn't exist?

Edited by DeeTillEhDeh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've backed up his assertions.

In the form of evidence, which he screams for on a regular basis.

It's easy to back someone up verbally.

I can confirm that Mr Bairn is a huge VL.

See?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you scream in post ?

Indulge me Confi and be specific.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the form of evidence, which he screams for on a regular basis.

It's easy to back someone up verbally.

I can confirm that Mr Bairn is a huge VL.

See?

Like I said, you can't access Private Eye online, and these aren't the kind of things that I make a point of remembering. But I don't know what me and HB would get out of colluding to invent a fake section in a fortnightly magazine.

I'm genuinely surprised that people don't realise this happens all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, you can't access Private Eye online, and these aren't the kind of things that I make a point of remembering. But I don't know what me and HB would get out of colluding to invent a fake section in a fortnightly magazine.

I'm genuinely surprised that people don't realise this happens all the time.

You appear to be missing the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else cringe when Mr Bairn uses the 'NCC' term?

Doesn't really register when any of the other Unionists use it.

Maybe it's because he's a young 'un.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else cringe when Mr Bairn uses the 'NCC' term?

Doesn't really register when any of the other Unionists use it.

Maybe it's because he's a young 'un.

Tbh, I cringe when they all use it. Deetillehdeh I think he's called used it earlier. I cringed.

Though, yeah, it is super-cringey when Scrappy Doo uses it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newpapers do do it. It's a fact. I can't remember individual examples that Private Eye point out (although the Daily Express's Diana conspiracy articles were a regular feature), because oddly I don't catalogue things like that in case I need them for future online arguments, but they do appear in the magazine on a fairly regular basis.

You'd have to be able to remember a specific story from a newspaper to be able to search for it in newspaper archives.

Columnists do it all the time, news stories almost never. Speaking as a Private Eye reader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...