mizfit Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 Not sure if serious, but the seethe if this is true 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 I love the Sun all left wing media can get in the bin I'm voting Tory forever. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Man Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 Welcome back sweet bare breasted princesses. Just reported on BBC news that the Sun said it's a lot of shite and page 3 is back. I cannot fucking wait to hear the rage from the feminists who were originally calling it "a victory". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizfit Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 @nomorepage3 on Twitter has thanked them for giving them publicity 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 I'm not fussed either way on the issue, but this should provide some serious moaning, so I approve. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 Yassss haha fucking brilliant. Awa on twitter to soak up the seeeeeethe. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavin_3110 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Read a few along the lines of; "Not the first time the sun have lied! #jft96" Was only a matter of time before scousers started playing the victim. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbornbairn Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Top trolling 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgecutter Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I favourited a couple of Rhian 'love of my life' Sugdens tweets the night and just got this notification, f**k aye. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstaggies66 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Right.. So a woman choosing to appear partially nude and get paid an extremely generous sum of money relative to the amount of work they've done is degrading.. As for her finding it "distasteful", that's fantastic and you're entitled to view it as such, but campaigning to have something BANNED just because you find it unappealing is borderline zealotry.Mark my words, with Sturgeon in charge it won't be long before hardcore pornography itself is illegal in Scotland. Already tried it here a few years back after it was completely banned in Iceland.I knew shit was turning (even fucking more) south the minute she announced her cabinet and her following statements about her choices..I've not read a newspaper in about 7 years, and Page 3 isn't really my thing at all.. but clearly Sturgeon is pandering to the hardline, oppressive elements of the modern feminist agenda, which seems to be desiring to bring us back to the 1950s when it comes to sexuality..Don't get me wrong, there's sex positive feminists out there who see this shit for what it is and hate it as much as I do, so I'm not attacking all feminists or the ideology in general.But this shit Sturgeon's dabbing in is fucking toxic, and it just keeps fucking spreading. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstaggies66 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Well creepy in retrospect. Retrospect here meaning of course: "Now that we think differently on this matter because other people have told us to think differently on this matter" Anyone here ever study history (including other cultures and from a sociological perspective) and come to that moment when you realize we just keep recyling the same bullshit over and over every few generations and calling it "progress"? One generation homosexuals are okay, the next we're burning them at the stake, the next it's imprisonment and behaviorial modification, next it's acceptance and "normalization", few generations time they'll be getting drowned in rivers again.. And people today just chart the treatment of homosexuals from an arbitrary point in history to make it look like we haven't been going in circles there, and ignoring the fact that we're doing the same shit today with groups of peoples and various paraphilias and things that have nothing to do with sexuality. For example Muslims becoming the new Jews of Europe, pogroms against Muslims here being mere decades away.. maybe they really just don't see it, it is possible I guess. I'd just really like to be at peace. I don't like being here anymore. I wish they'd come back. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banana Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Retrospect here meaning of course: "Now that we think differently on this matter because other people have told us to think differently on this matter" Anyone here ever study history (including other cultures and from a sociological perspective) and come to that moment when you realize we just keep recyling the same bullshit over and over every few generations and calling it "progress"? One generation homosexuals are okay, the next we're burning them at the stake, the next it's imprisonment and behaviorial modification, next it's acceptance and "normalization", few generations time they'll be getting drowned in rivers again.. And people today just chart the treatment of homosexuals from an arbitrary point in history to make it look like we haven't been going in circles there, and ignoring the fact that we're doing the same shit today with groups of peoples and various paraphilias and things that have nothing to do with sexuality. For example Muslims becoming the new Jews of Europe, pogroms against Muslims here being mere decades away.. maybe they really just don't see it, it is possible I guess. I'd just really like to be at peace. I don't like being here anymore. I wish they'd come back. Careful with perspective, historical context and logic with the faint of heart on here. Things are just 'creepy' or they're not, ok? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Given that this person is being deliberately contradictory in every single post, it's either an alias or a shite troll. Either way, I've decided to pay attention to absolutely f**k all that they have to say. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstaggies66 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Careful with perspective, historical context and logic with the faint of heart on here. Things are just 'creepy' or they're not, ok? A light in the darkness. Thank you for that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstaggies66 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Given that this person is being deliberately contradictory in every single post, In what way have I been contradictory? I've got fairly comfortable stances on most issues and have for some time, often I'll make satirical/sarcastic comments that may not translate well to text (or in my toneless voice come to think of it) or may just fail to hit home as satire to people so utterly blinded by the ideology I'm mocking. But I really doubt I've genuinely contradicted myself since joining here 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Cicero Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Sturgeon has a head i'd love to squeeze 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I remember some years back one of the papers (Sun or Sport, can't remember which) doing a countdown. If memory serves it was to Lindsay Dawn McKenzie's 16th birthday when she would "finally" be topless after months of appearing (age 15) in skimpy gear. This must have been in the 90s. They did the same with a young girl called Natalie Banus, who later modelled under the name Natalie Jay. Apparently, a friend was reminding me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hillonearth Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Retrospect here meaning of course: "Now that we think differently on this matter because other people have told us to think differently on this matter" In my case, retrospect meaning Samantha Fox is around my age, therefore when they showed the then 15 year old in the Sun in the early 80s saying she'd be whipping 'em out the following week when she was legal my thoughts were along the lines of "Right on..." Looking back as an adult, it's specifically the countdown element that's a bit disturbing, as it almost has undertones of a symbolic defloration by the nation considering the amount of people who read the Sun back then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMartyn86 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 http://wingsoverscotland.com/shooting-at-shadows/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.