The Master Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 For spouting bigoted pish about parades, which no SNP MP will do as they aren't bigots. No, it was for calling the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland a liar. You're clearly a bitter unionist, hence all your posts on this thread. You're almost shaking with rage right now. Yea, I'm such a bitter unionist that I'd make posts like this and this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuzzyAffro Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 No, it was for calling the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland a liar. Yea, I'm such a bitter unionist that I'd make posts like this and this. In an argument about parades, borne out of his bigotry. Whatever, I can't be arsed with you anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 In an argument about parades, borne out of his bigotry. His ejection was a direct result of calling the Secretary of State a liar and nothing to do with what came before. I'd be shocked if there wasn't at least one instance of an SNP MP calling someone a liar in this parliament. Whatever, I can't be arsed with you anymore. Thanks for playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 No, it was for calling the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland a liar. No he didn't call her a liar. He stated that she was deliberately deceptive for not answering a question. That is not an accusation of lying but a slur on her integrity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 No he didn't call her a liar. He stated that she was deliberately deceptive for not answering a question. That is not an accusation of lying but a slur on her integrity. It was Paul Flynn then who called someone a liar, then. I knew it was one way round or the other but couldn't be bothered looking it up. The point still stands, though - the ejection was because of the slur, not what led up to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuzzyAffro Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 His ejection was a direct result of calling the Secretary of State a liar and nothing to do with what came before. I'd be shocked if there wasn't at least one instance of an SNP MP calling someone a liar in this parliament. Thanks for playing. I'd be disappointed if they didn't, if someone lies they should be called a liar. And that place is full of them. It was also be a propaganda coup for the SNP in the right circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 So when was the last time someone was ejected or banned? You're clutching at straws here, this is a load of pish from a bitter unionist. The SNP are going to spend the next five years trolling the shit out of that disgusting place, and I fucking love it. Deal with it. Spend 5 years 'trolling the shit' out of the place, where's the ambition and aspiration in that? Expectations depressingly low. Predictable though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 No he didn't call her a liar. He stated that she was deliberately deceptive for not answering a question. That is not an accusation of lying but a slur on her integrity. ...and probably the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 I'd be disappointed if they didn't, if someone lies they should be called a liar. And that place is full of them. At which point they would need to withdraw the accusation, or be ejected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuzzyAffro Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Spend 5 years 'trolling the shit' out of the place, where's the ambition and aspiration in that? Expectations depressingly low. Predictable though The two aren't mutually exclusive champ. You stick to forelock tugging for German billionaires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 The two aren't mutually exclusive champ. You stick to forelock tugging for German billionaires. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banana Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 A top notch advantage of rejecting political party affiliation is the ability enjoy/study this kind of mutually petty, double standardy, cognitive dissonanced, trenchdug mudflinging from the outskirts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 ...and probably the truth. There was no probably about it. Ministers do it all the time, just on this occasion she was called out on it. The position of Nigel Dodds was that if she answered the original question then he would withdraw the accusation and Bercow shot him down. I thought that he was entirely justified in his stance. The fact that it was about parades and he is in the DUP is actually irrelavant. The HoC lives in a era of honour and procedure and really needs to get itself into the 21st century. If any of the recent (expense) and previous (cash for honours, peodo rings) revelations has shown us anything is that these representatives are perhaps the least deserving of this respect. Everyone knows that politicians tell outright lies and they should be able to be called for what they are when caught. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scary Bear Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Many people on the snp offical fb page have called me a traitor to my country and abused me because i denied scotland its rightfull "freedom" in september,their logic is straight forward if you vote against the "scottish national party" you are voting against scotland, Kev, it's more likely the fact that your posts seem quite negative about the SNP and about issues relating to Scotland in general. The fact that you hold these views and go on the SNP Facebook page, knowing these views probably won't be well received, is pretty blatant trolling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 A top notch advantage of rejecting political party affiliation is the ability enjoy/study this kind of mutually petty, double standardy, cognitive dissonanced, trenchdug mudflinging from the outskirts That is brilliant. Is that the river Tweed looking frae the west? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 There was no probably about it. Ministers do it all the time, just on this occasion she was called out on it. The position of Nigel Dodds was that if she answered the original question then he would withdraw the accusation and Bercow shot him down. I thought that he was entirely justified in his stance. The fact that it was about parades and he is in the DUP is actually irrelavant. The HoC lives in a era of honour and procedure and really needs to get itself into the 21st century. If any of the recent (expense) and previous (cash for honours, peodo rings) revelations has shown us anything is that these representatives are perhaps the least deserving of this respect. Everyone knows that politicians tell outright lies and they should be able to be called for what they are when caught. My post was 'tongue in cheek' I fully endorse your post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted May 14, 2015 Author Share Posted May 14, 2015 Sturgeon is apparently the highest paid politician in the UK Nope. She turned payrise down, or donated it to charity if I remember Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Nope. She turned payrise down, or donated it to charity if I remember I think she donates a lot to charity but purely by how much she earns she is the highest apparently. Would think Salmond is up there. MP, MSP and retired FM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 I think she donates a lot to charity but purely by how much she earns she is the highest apparently. Would think Salmond is up there. MP, MSP and retired FM One million pounds would not be overpaying Salmond. He is the dictionary definition of "sum boi". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted May 14, 2015 Author Share Posted May 14, 2015 One million pounds would not be overpaying Salmond. He is the dictionary definition of "sum boi". Defo. But he donates a lot of his salary too. Tope bloke. ' the dream is certainly much alive again' . In fact no longer a dream. A reality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.