NotThePars Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 oaksoft doesn't trust facts and prefers to rely purely on his own prejudices and instinct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon EF Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 57 minutes ago, NotThePars said: oaksoft doesn't trust facts and prefers to rely purely on his own prejudices and instinct. Don't you know the internet is 100% unjustified and abused raw data? Here's a link to prove it ... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Don't you know the internet is 100% unjustified and abused raw data? Here's a link to prove it ... I've spoken to my mates in data recruitment and they assure me that you can in fact prove anything with facts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
renton Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Just now, oaksoft said: Really? You really don't know? Enlighten me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 1 minute ago, oaksoft said: It certainly is evidence. I am not argiung that. I am arguing that it is not proof of the original point. Were you expecting him just to go out and ask everyone? It is very strong/good evidence for the claim he made, which you asked for, back in your box. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon EF Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Claim oaksoft doesn't like: <100% incontrovertible proof = pure speculation. Claim oaksoft does like: some guy once said or oaksoft used to work in recruitment = cast iron fact. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Stubbs Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 The guy who's best known on here for making prejudice-based, wholly unsubstantiated statements about whole swatches of society, doesn't think Edinburgh University research can be treated as evidence. Is there a name for the complex of rating your own opinion so highly that you basically have no grip on reality? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Stubbs Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 1 minute ago, oaksoft said: Are all youngsters incapable of reading a series of posts before jumping straight in with their mouths wide open or is it just you? Your own post that you've quoted there was a word salady bit of backtracking. The point stands. It's pretty bizarre for you of all people to comment on the strength of someone's evidence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Goodguy: Claim Rasper: Where's your proof? Goodguy: Here Rasper: That's just evidence, not proof. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 http://cdp.sagepub.com/content/12/3/83.abstract Now able to be re-branded as the 'Oaksoft effect'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavin_3110 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 I see Sturgeon is banging her drum again. A despicable woman, possibly the worst who ever lived. Wish she would be sent to the tower like in days of yore. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 I see Sturgeon is banging her drum again. A despicable woman, possibly the worst who ever lived. Wish she would be sent to the tower like in days of yore. Shut up ya fanny -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob the tank Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 I see Sturgeon is banging her drum again. A despicable woman, possibly the worst who ever lived. Wish she would be sent to the tower like in days of yore. Please explain 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkoRaj Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 Please explain Please don't. Guy is obviously a cretjn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cream Cheese Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 8 hours ago, gavin_3110 said: I see Sturgeon is banging her drum again. A despicable woman, possibly the worst who ever lived. Wish she would be sent to the tower like in days of yore. Sturgeon doesn't go around banging drums. We leave the drums and flutes to the likes of yourself and oaksoft. The towers fell with the times, as will the union. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 10 hours ago, bob the tank said: Please explain He thinks Scotland is a region of England, and the Tower of London lies in Scotland's capital. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob the tank Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 He thinks Scotland is a region of England, and the Tower of London lies in Scotland's capital. I realise that but I'd like his rationale for posting his continual SNPbad drivel 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 (edited) The only despicable woman appearing on every media outlet - since the dawn of time seemingly - is not so cuddly Ruth. Busy trying to shout down EU citizens living in Scotland by day, rambling on about "what the people of Scotland want" by night. Which is of course utterly laughable coming from the leader who achieved a far smaller share of the vote in Scotland in May's election than Margaret Thatcher did on all three occasions. She knows f**k all about what the people of Scotland want - that's why they didn't vote for her or her shit party. Edited September 8, 2016 by vikingTON 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 11 minutes ago, vikingTON said: She knows f**k all about what the people of Scotland want - that's why they didn't vote for her or her shit party. Surely some mistake? I was reliably informed that the Tories had triumphantly romped the Scottish election, putting those nasty Scottish nats back in their place and taking independence off the agenda for good. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 The only despicable woman appearing on every media outlet - since the dawn of time seemingly - is not so cuddly Ruth. Busy trying to shout down EU citizens living in Scotland by day, rambling on about "what the people of Scotland want" by night. Which is of course utterly laughable coming from the leader who achieved a far smaller share of the vote in Scotland in May's election than Margaret Thatcher did on all three occasions. She knows f**k all about what the people of Scotland want - that's why they didn't vote for her or her shit party. This... and her fukin hypocrisy.Ms equality... well tell that to the non UK EU citizens currently living in Scotland. Support them Ruth, you're a fukin shambles 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.