Billy Jean King Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Have some of them now put on masks ??? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Cole-Hamilton is up again. Here we go. FFS. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Jesus Chirst. Alex Cole Hamilton is a fucking moron. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diegomarahenry Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, Ivo den Bieman said: Would you burn down the whole prospect of everything you’ve spent your life trying to achieve, politically? Would you accept being labelled a pervert or potentially jailed? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Khaki Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, diegomarahenry said: Would you accept being labelled a pervert or potentially jailed? No crazy on the idea of the jail. No comment on the other part. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Stopped watching. Has there been any explosive smoking gun? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 (edited) And Salmond flushes any serious breach of the Ministerial Code down the toilet. No evidence that Nicola Sturgeon knew anything about specific allegations before the meeting on the 29th of March. And no evidence of what was actually discussed on the 29th of March. Edited February 26, 2021 by Jim McLean's Ghost 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Would you accept being labelled a pervert or potentially jailed?He basically labelled himself a pervert to avoid being jailed, part of his defence was being a "touchy feely" type of guy ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 And Salmond flushes any serious breach of the Ministerial Code down the toilet. No evidence that Nicola Sturgeon knew anything about specific allegations before the meeting on the 29th of March. And no evidence of what was actually discussed on the 29th of March.I was about to post exactly the same but couldn't quite believe he had just said that. Did NS know before the meeting with Aberdein....I don't know, you need to ask her ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 3 minutes ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said: And Salmond flushes any serious breach of the Ministerial Code down the toilet. No evidence that Nicola Sturgeon knew anything about specific allegations before the meeting on the 29th of March. And no evidence of what was actually discussed on the 29th of March. Do you not think they might be waiting to see what Sturgeon says then put the evidence out rather than giving her time to move the goalposts? There is a lot more evidence than has been allowed to be heard here. Given how interested Neil and the Spectator are it wouldn't be a surprise if they publish it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Do you not think they might be waiting to see what Sturgeon says then put the evidence out rather than giving her time to move the goalposts? There is a lot more evidence than has been allowed to be heard here. Given how interested Neil and the Spectator are it wouldn't be a surprise if they publish it. It has to be the tactic as this is just wishy washy pish. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Detournement said: Do you not think they might be waiting to see what Sturgeon says then put the evidence out rather than giving her time to move the goalposts? There is a lot more evidence than has been allowed to be heard here. Given how interested Neil and the Spectator are it wouldn't be a surprise if they publish it. Nicola Sturgeon has locked in her evidence. She stood before parliament and clarified that the April 2nd meeting was the first time she knew substantial details of the complaints against Salmond. And that the 29th of March meeting was solely for the purposes of arranging the April 2nd meeting. So it doesn't seem to me like Nicola can move the goalposts here. Perhaps you should ask if there is more evidence to be published then why hasn't the Spectator already published it? Edited February 26, 2021 by Jim McLean's Ghost 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 7 minutes ago, Detournement said: Do you not think they might be waiting to see what Sturgeon says then put the evidence out rather than giving her time to move the goalposts? There is a lot more evidence than has been allowed to be heard here. Given how interested Neil and the Spectator are it wouldn't be a surprise if they publish it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbionMan Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ludo*1 said: The worry was never what Salmond would or could supply today, because he's got nothing on key figures, it's the way the media will now frame and hound Sturgeon without batting an eye at what's going on down South. What's happening elsewhere has f... all all to do with SNP's wee domestic, a touch of green/blue whitabootery there. Edited February 26, 2021 by AlbionMan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Just now, AlbionMan said: What's happening elsewhere has f... all all to do with SNP's wee domestic. In terms of a journalism perspective, it does. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirty dingus Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 1 minute ago, AlbionMan said: What's happening elsewhere has f... all all to do with SNP's wee domestic. It's about coverage, the MSM are throwing everyone at this story whilst ignoring the Tories breaking the law and using a harry and meghan squirrel to bury it 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diegomarahenry Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said: 8 minutes ago, diegomarahenry said: Would you accept being labelled a pervert or potentially jailed? He basically labelled himself a pervert to avoid being jailed, part of his defence was being a "touchy feely" type of guy ! There is being inappropriate and there is rape, What he admitted to was being inappropriate. Both are wrong but they are also miles apart. I am not trying to defend Salmond, but looking at the whole situation without picking a side, He was accused, found not guilty, accused again and found not proven by a jury, so an innocent man in the eyes of the law. People can insinuate all they like, he was not convicted. Why someone would want to ruin Salmonds life is harder to work out, I don't know the details but I am more than sure they are known in the wider political arena to the point that they are splitting the SNP support. My point to the original post was that it is not an ego driven spat, if someone falsely accused me of a despicable crime, I'd come out swinging. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Salmond doesn't understand that people wanting you to be found guilty of crimes they think you have committed is not a conspiracy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 4 minutes ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said: Salmond doesn't understand that people wanting you to be found guilty of crimes they think you have committed is not a conspiracy. Multiple people lying in tandem is though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bob Mahelp Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 I notice that the newspapers have moved on from 'bombshell evidence' to simply reporting Salmond's opinion....'the Scottish government is not fit for purpose'. Fair enough Alex, that's your opinion. File it under 'Jim Sillars', and off you pop. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.