Jump to content

General Politics Thread


Granny Danger

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, sparky88 said:

It's not lying. The daily mail was talking about travel expenses and other selected expenses that went up. WOS shot back with a load of whataboutery (a very common theme for wos articles) about the total expenses spend being down. Both sources selectively used the figures for their own ends.

WOS is showing the whole thing. The Daily Mail is using selective statistics as you admit yourself. It's morons like you who read papers like the Daily Mail, Express and Telegraph who take a whataboutery attitude, because you know what you're reading isn't giving you the complete picture. Just selective facts while leaving out the rest in order to create a narritive bias.

But as long as it reads #SNPbad, you don't really care if it isn't accurate when compared to the complete picture.

You don't even consider the fact that their travelling expenses are higher, because they have far greater involvement over debates and voting at westminster than the previous labconlib arrangement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NotThePars said:

I think someone worked out the "health tourist" unclaimed costs were about £200 million or 0.02% of the budget.

 


Then again it feels a bit pointless to challenge this from an economic perspective when it's obviously ideologically motivated.

As a percentage of the whole budget it's tiny, but presumably there is a disproportionate impact on NHS trusts in areas with lots of foreign nationals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, NotThePars said:

I think someone worked out the "health tourist" unclaimed costs were about £200 million or 0.02% of the budget.

 


Then again it feels a bit pointless to challenge this from an economic perspective when it's obviously ideologically motivated.

 

Sadly populist policies like this is something the right are very good at, cheered on by the Daily Mail, Express, Sun, etc.  Those on the left politically find it hard to respond.

I can see more policies of this type emerging, whilst millions suffer solutions to non-existent problems will abound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government are apparently about to ban access to porn which includes 'non-conventional' sex acts.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/23/censor-non-conventional-sex-acts-online-internet-pornography

There's something that makes me feel very uncomfortable about the government deciding what counts as 'non-conventional', particularly as apparently this includes female orgasms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jmothecat said:

The government are apparently about to ban access to porn which includes 'non-conventional' sex acts.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/23/censor-non-conventional-sex-acts-online-internet-pornography

There's something that makes me feel very uncomfortable about the government deciding what counts as 'non-conventional', particularly as apparently this includes female orgasms.

They should just start with their own "non-conventional" sex acts for now, that'll be plenty for the search engines to be getting on with for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jmothecat said:

The government are apparently about to ban access to porn which includes 'non-conventional' sex acts.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/23/censor-non-conventional-sex-acts-online-internet-pornography

There's something that makes me feel very uncomfortable about the government deciding what counts as 'non-conventional', particularly as apparently this includes female orgasms.

Sounds like they want to make sure that they themselves are not subject to xhamster videos.  Especially given previous revelations regarding MPs and ministers.

Edited by strichener
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government are apparently about to ban access to porn which includes 'non-conventional' sex acts.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/23/censor-non-conventional-sex-acts-online-internet-pornography

There's something that makes me feel very uncomfortable about the government deciding what counts as 'non-conventional', particularly as apparently this includes female orgasms.


Never realised the Barnett formula was the 'Four Fingered Rule' !!?[emoji15] eek!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jmothecat said:

The government are apparently about to ban access to porn which includes 'non-conventional' sex acts.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/23/censor-non-conventional-sex-acts-online-internet-pornography

There's something that makes me feel very uncomfortable about the government deciding what counts as 'non-conventional', particularly as apparently this includes female orgasms.

If conventional is anything a Tory MP or lord has been up to then anything goes. Lock up your pigs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conservative MSP misses parliamentary committee meeting because he is linesman in Sporting Lisbon v Real Madrid game.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-38078341?intlink_from_url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/football/38074963&link_location=live-reporting-story

 


He's excused. IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...