Jump to content

General Politics Thread


Granny Danger

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, doulikefish said:

Scrapping at the tory conference emoji23.png

Just before Patel’s speech claiming the Tories are the party of “law and order”.  Perfect comic timing.

Edited by Granny Danger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Baxter Parp said:
52 minutes ago, LongTimeLurker said:
On a football board? Get a grip and do your own research.

No, it's the duty of the poster to back up their bullshit. That's an ancient convention as old as the internet that you are either unaware of or trying to avoid because you're talking shite.

You are seriously so brainwashed that you think the following are in any way controversial in terms of the scientific literature?

(i) CO2 fertilisation effect:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CO2_fertilization_effect

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/11/10/if-youre-looking-for-good-news-about-climate-change-this-is-about-the-best-there-is-right-now/

(ii) Himalayas weathering

https://www.briangwilliams.us/carbon-cycle-2/mountain-uplift-physical-erosion-and-weathering.html

and that there is any controversy over the way that fossil fuel discoveries are not keeping pace with reserve depletion?

https://dieselnet.com/news/2018/07oil.php

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil

 

 

Edited by LongTimeLurker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not buying it. Anyone who has a reasonable knowledge of science should know that nothing I was referring to was fringe or controversial and wouldn't need to ask in the first place.
Not buying what? It's the way internet forums are and always have been. If you can't or won't back up what you're saying then the assumption is that you're talking shite. Nothing I have referred to is fringe or controversial, Tonto. Like you said, it's a football forum, so back up your shit or shut the f**k up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Baxter Parp said:
20 minutes ago, LongTimeLurker said:
Not buying it. Anyone who has a reasonable knowledge of science should know that nothing I was referring to was fringe or controversial and wouldn't need to ask in the first place.

...so back up your shit or shut the f**k up.

I have already added the links above just to show the scientifically illiterate on here that it's possible to do so. There is nothing controversial about stating that rising CO2 levels are currently helping plant growth or stating that mankind will probably not be able to ramp up fossil fuels use through to the end of the century even if we wanted to because the easily exploited reserves are finite and fast running out.

Edited by LongTimeLurker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have already added the links above just to show the scientifically illiterate on here that it's possible to do so. There is nothing controversial about stating that rising CO2 levels are currently helping plant growth or stating that mankind will probably not be able to ramp up fossil fuels use through to the end of the century even if we wanted to because the easily exploited reserves are finite and fast running out.
I haven't commented on either issue, chum. HTH.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...