Albus Bulbasaur Posted April 22, 2022 Share Posted April 22, 2022 I'm also enjoying watching Piers Morgan arguing with Nigel Farage over which one of them loves big daddy Trump more. It's fascinating in a disgusting way. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted April 22, 2022 Share Posted April 22, 2022 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted April 23, 2022 Share Posted April 23, 2022 17 hours ago, Suspect Device said: Thick As Shit. I'm glad she's responsible for Tennis pitches. Seems a difficult job. 17 hours ago, Suspect Device said: Apologies. Never noticed. When Boris gets binned you'd expect whoever replaces him to get her the f**k away from any job ASAP. Surely she's in for departures honours and will be in the Lord's for evermore. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted April 23, 2022 Share Posted April 23, 2022 First it was Matt Hancock claiming that dyslexia is responsible for his 'foot in mouth' calamities. Now it's Nadine Dorries. Am I alone in finding these claims hard to believe ? https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/23/nadine-dorries-claims-dyslexia-made-her-say-downstream-films 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 23, 2022 Author Share Posted April 23, 2022 1 hour ago, Florentine_Pogen said: First it was Matt Hancock claiming that dyslexia is responsible for his 'foot in mouth' calamities. Now it's Nadine Dorries. Am I alone in finding these claims hard to believe ? https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/23/nadine-dorries-claims-dyslexia-made-her-say-downstream-films Does her dyslexia make her confuse dyslexia with stupidity? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted April 25, 2022 Share Posted April 25, 2022 On 23/04/2022 at 16:04, Florentine_Pogen said: First it was Matt Hancock claiming that dyslexia is responsible for his 'foot in mouth' calamities. Now it's Nadine Dorries. Am I alone in finding these claims hard to believe ? https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/23/nadine-dorries-claims-dyslexia-made-her-say-downstream-films Let's be kind here, and assume she's telling the truth about her dyslexia and the effect it has upon her life. Should that not make it even more important that she asks one of her (non-dyslexia-suffering) family staff to check this kind of stuff over before she puts it online for all to see?* That she hasn't done so simply confirms the original diagnosis of her being thicker than two short ones. *Given her remit, you'd think she'd be more careful before committing anything to cyberspace in perpetuity. Evidently not. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Job Posted April 25, 2022 Share Posted April 25, 2022 I can only see Musk buying Twitter as a terrible thing Great for political disinformation campaigns though 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albus Bulbasaur Posted April 25, 2022 Share Posted April 25, 2022 24 minutes ago, Clown Job said: I can only see Musk buying Twitter as a terrible thing Great for political disinformation campaigns though I may be naive here but I don't think it will change much, can't see there being anything too drastic. Wouldn't be surprised if Trump and Co were allowed back on though. I think it's funny that Elon Musk and his fanbois try and sell him as some Tony Stark type of guy that's thinking about the bigger problems, looking to the future for the betterment of mankind when really at this point he's just utterly consumed by shitposting on Twitter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 27, 2022 Author Share Posted April 27, 2022 Rishi Sunak Did Not Breach Ministerial Code Over Tax Affairs, Ethics Chief Rules https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/rishi-sunka-cleared-lord-geidt-ministerial-code-breach-tax-affairs-akshata-murty_uk_6269614ee4b086dbfa888dbd Surely this is good news aye? I mean we all trust Lord Geidt don’t we? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt n Vinegar Posted April 27, 2022 Share Posted April 27, 2022 14 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: Rishi Sunak Did Not Breach Ministerial Code Over Tax Affairs, Ethics Chief Rules https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/rishi-sunka-cleared-lord-geidt-ministerial-code-breach-tax-affairs-akshata-murty_uk_6269614ee4b086dbfa888dbd Surely this is good news aye? I mean we all trust Lord Geidt don’t we? I trust no lords, be they terrestrial or supernatural! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted April 28, 2022 Share Posted April 28, 2022 The SNP Led Glasgow City Council deciding that they are above the law. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-61251112 Quote Lord Ericht wrote "In this case however the respondent adopted the wholly extraordinary position that an order for specific performance should not be granted because it proposed not to comply with the court's decision and instead continue to act unlawfully." Paints a completely different picture to the message the SNP leadership are espousing towards refugees wanting to seek to make Scotland their home. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted April 28, 2022 Share Posted April 28, 2022 1 hour ago, strichener said: The SNP Led Glasgow City Council deciding that they are above the law. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-61251112 Paints a completely different picture to the message the SNP leadership are espousing towards refugees wanting to seek to make Scotland their home. Asides from the legal issue, I'd like to hear the occupational therapist's argument for why it would be impossible for 10 and 12 year old girls to share a room if a 5 room house was not available. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted April 28, 2022 Share Posted April 28, 2022 Why would anyone in their right mind ever trust / believe a politician ? https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/27/female-mps-demand-suspension-of-accused-porn-watcher-in-house-of-commons https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/apr/28/tory-mp-jamie-wallis-charged-over-car-crash https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/28/mp-liam-byrne-should-be-suspended-from-commons-for-breaching-bullying-rules-panel 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted April 28, 2022 Share Posted April 28, 2022 1 hour ago, welshbairn said: Asides from the legal issue, I'd like to hear the occupational therapist's argument for why it would be impossible for 10 and 12 year old girls to share a room if a 5 room house was not available. You are sounding rather Toryish here. A professional has looked at this objectively and the Council have not only said that they can't provide suitable accommodation. They have doubled down on the implications by taking it to the absolute extreme and never going to happen situation on using CPOs, demolishing houses and rebuilding. If it got near that stage then it would be far easier for the council to purchase a property on the open market. Anyway, looks like the rhetoric of a warm welcome only extends to those without specialist needs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawson Park Boy Posted April 28, 2022 Share Posted April 28, 2022 1 hour ago, strichener said: You are sounding rather Toryish here. A professional has looked at this objectively and the Council have not only said that they can't provide suitable accommodation. They have doubled down on the implications by taking it to the absolute extreme and never going to happen situation on using CPOs, demolishing houses and rebuilding. If it got near that stage then it would be far easier for the council to purchase a property on the open market. Anyway, looks like the rhetoric of a warm welcome only extends to those without specialist needs. On this occasion, I agree with welshbairn. Ludicrous that people fleeing for their lives can’t accept such a property. If it’s no good to them, there’s always the option of returning to whence they came. -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted April 28, 2022 Share Posted April 28, 2022 Just now, Dawson Park Boy said: On this occasion, I agree with welshbairn. Ludicrous that people fleeing for their lives can’t accept such a property. If it’s no good to them, there’s always the option of returning to whence they came. That comes as no surprise that your opinion is odious. I'm sure Welshbairn will be along to confirm that you are not actuly in agreement. If this were a local family in the same circumstances then they would be entitled to the same housing. Recommending discrimination based on where you happened to be born isn't a good look for anyone. In your case it probably doesn't even rank in the top 100 of your repulsive opinions. The only thing I am surprised about is that you didn't discuss this with your wife a make a joint declaration. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted April 28, 2022 Share Posted April 28, 2022 28 minutes ago, strichener said: That comes as no surprise that your opinion is odious. I'm sure Welshbairn will be along to confirm that you are not actuly in agreement. If this were a local family in the same circumstances then they would be entitled to the same housing. Recommending discrimination based on where you happened to be born isn't a good look for anyone. In your case it probably doesn't even rank in the top 100 of your repulsive opinions. The only thing I am surprised about is that you didn't discuss this with your wife a make a joint declaration. Ach, he can always go back and edit his post to include her input - shouldn't be a problem, what her being imaginary and all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted April 28, 2022 Share Posted April 28, 2022 (edited) Seems like quite a difficult position for the council tbh but, it is unsmart in the extreme to tell a judge you don't plan to abide by his rulings. They do get a bit huffy at that kind of talk. Edited April 28, 2022 by williemillersmoustache 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Job Posted April 28, 2022 Share Posted April 28, 2022 2 hours ago, strichener said: You are sounding rather Toryish here. A professional has looked at this objectively and the Council have not only said that they can't provide suitable accommodation. They have doubled down on the implications by taking it to the absolute extreme and never going to happen situation on using CPOs, demolishing houses and rebuilding. If it got near that stage then it would be far easier for the council to purchase a property on the open market. Anyway, looks like the rhetoric of a warm welcome only extends to those without specialist needs. GCC don’t have any properties (thanks Labour) They’re totally reliant on the local RSL’s 5 bedroom property don’t come up very often with them 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted April 28, 2022 Share Posted April 28, 2022 Apparently over 50 MP’s currently under investigation for inappropriate behaviour. We should be checking all of their phones and subjecting them to drug tests with or without cause. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.