fan of the juniors Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 So it's not predictions by you just you updating maximum points every team can get every week?? Yip. 1st table I've just put up is the maximum each team can get & week by week that'll change for the clubs unless 1 goes on & wins every game between now & the seasons end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednblack Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Nice one you just threw me when you said you weren't far off with your predictions last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Can't be arsed going away back but I got the top 3 & bottom 3 correct although tipping Meadow to finish last wasn't exactly rocket science [emoji23][emoji23] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednblack Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Ah Ok mate so get money on glens because they can get the most points at this moment in time [emoji3] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Ah Ok mate so get money on glens because they can get the most points at this moment in time [emoji3] [emoji106][emoji106]Which makes Mcbookies odds on for Talbot a little strangePersonally I would be Glen's EvsRab's 7/4Talbot 4sBeith 6 s But am no a bookie so god knows how their minds work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanner Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 15 minutes ago, fan of the juniors said: Which makes Mcbookies odds on for Talbot a little strange Personally I would be Glen's Evs Rab's 7/4 Talbot 4s Beith 6 s But am no a bookie so god knows how their minds work Talbot will be shorter odds as they attract a lot more backing from punters and the bookies need to cover themselves. The odds won't be based on who they think is the best side. I'd imagine there would have been next to nothing on Glens or KRR at the start of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednblack Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Rabs were biggest odds start of season 50s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 I'm genuinely stumped here. FOTJ all you have done is repost the possible macimum points available, that scotsvo has done in his table. How's that tipping anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 I'm genuinely stumped here. FOTJ all you have done is repost the possible macimum points available, that scotsvo has done in his table. How's that tipping anyone? Making it a bit more user friendly & also scotsvo hasn't posted in a while . Actually disappointed you didn't have a bigger rant [emoji23][emoji23] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 I don't rant. I just comment on the daftness of this thread. However, even that was overshadowed by you having the audacity to claim that you predicted the top and bottom three by making a maximum points list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 I don't rant. I just comment on the daftness of this thread.However, even that was overshadowed by you having the audacity to claim that you predicted the top and bottom three by making a maximum points list. Just pointing out that the thread has its uses & the only person to comment on its daftness was your good self Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Managed to find the post from last season & will put up my early prediction & in a bit the final table Then we can debate the folly of this thread or whether like the majority said its a worthwhile effort from all concerned Actually got the bottom 4 right mmm 1 Auchinleck. 55 2 Ladeside. 51 3 Hurlford. 50 4. Beith. 48 5. Glenafton. 47 6 Rob Roy. 47 7 Troon. 46 8 Pollok. 44 9 Arthurlie. 44 10 Shettleston. 36 11 Petershill. 35 12 Meadow. 32 And how the league finished. So as most sensible reasoned folk will agree it was more than a worthwhile exercise Final League table 1 Auchinleck. 45 Champions 2 Hurlford. 41 3 Ladeside. 40 4 Troon. 37 5 Pollok. 34 7 Glenafton. 31 7 Beith 30 8 Rob Roy. 27 9 Arthurlie. 26 10 Shettleston. 25 Play off 11 Petershill. 21 Relegated 12 Meadow. 13 Relegated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanner Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 if you ignore all the ones that didn't finish where you said it's 100% accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 if you ignore all the ones that didn't finish where you said it's 100% accurate. Top 3 right & bottom 4 . Not too bad & only showing to jb that it's not a pointless thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 But it wasn't a prediction by you. And my argument has been that the ACTUAL league table is more of a guide rather than counting up the maximum possible. It's stupid. Simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 But it wasn't a prediction by you. And my argument has been that the ACTUAL league table is more of a guide rather than counting up the maximum possible. It's stupid. Simple. Will agree to disagree. Some find it interesting others don't. Think personally it's a good indicator of where teams will finish if you start it at this point of the season but obviously you disagree .Just can't get round my head why someone who doesn't have an interest in it comments so frequently. Personally I'd just scroll past a thread that I'm not bothered with [emoji849][emoji849] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 ......or block the contributors. Anyone with any sense who has read my comments earlier in this thread can see they are tongue in cheek. And that same sensible person will see that the statistics quoted are, at best, irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 ......or block the contributors.Anyone with any sense who has read my comments earlier in this thread can see they are tongue in cheek. And that same sensible person will see that the statistics quoted are, at best, irrelevant. [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]. Your fooling no one auld bean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednblack Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Ma heeds aboot tae burst with this thread [emoji32] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Right y'are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.