DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 Why is it that some in the international community, in particular the USA, are so keen to try to enforce agreements on nuclear proliferation in some cases yet totally ignore others? Israel's you mean?Or India's?Or Pakistan's?Or South Africa's under apartheid? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 Guess who else was at Putin's table when Michael Flynn was sitting next to him? Jill Stein, who could well have handed Trump the election by taking electoral votes off Clinton. Looks like a boring night though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudder Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Watching BBC Hardtalk, what is this obsession with trying to get Russians admit they interfere in the Wests elections? Is there any Country in the Arab world or Central America that the US hasn't tried to influence in the last 50 years? wasnt sure if I was watching Veep when some American nonce was greeting about Iran trying influence Foriegn elections 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetterlund Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 2 hours ago, Mudder said: Watching BBC Hardtalk, what is this obsession with trying to get Russians admit they interfere in the Wests elections? Is there any Country in the Arab world or Central America that the US hasn't tried to influence in the last 50 years? wasnt sure if I was watching Veep when some American nonce was greeting about Iran trying influence Foriegn elections It must be the secrecy the Americans don't like. They prefer the blatant approach to influencing foreign politics, like jetting their president into a country to tell them how to vote in a referendum, or having State Dept officials handing out cookies at anti-government rallies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 It must be the secrecy the Americans don't like. They prefer the blatant approach to influencing foreign politics, like jetting their president into a country to tell them how to vote in a referendum, or having State Dept officials handing out cookies at anti-government rallies. Where did the cookie story happen? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetterlund Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 4 hours ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: Where did the cookie story happen? Ukraine. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DS65jqrHQi_c&ved=0ahUKEwjNib_80bbTAhWPK1AKHR_ODQ8Q3ywIGzAA&usg=AFQjCNHJwoAGWo1IOYoSnb9u5uYrUJp70g 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 7 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DS65jqrHQi_c&ved=0ahUKEwjNib_80bbTAhWPK1AKHR_ODQ8Q3ywIGzAA&usg=AFQjCNHJwoAGWo1IOYoSnb9u5uYrUJp70g ^^^ What the internet was made for ^^^ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 Enjoying Louise Mensch labelling anyone and everyone as a Putin shill. Scenes when it comes out she's funded by the Kremlin. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernLights Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Bombing Canada next is my guess... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambino7 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 56 minutes ago, NorthernLights said: Bombing Canada next is my guess... Not many people will have an issue with that tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senorsoupe Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 51 minutes ago, Bambino7 said: Not many people will have an issue with that tbh. I object!! We had sorta been hoping we could go the entire 4 years without him noticing we exist but he seems to have found us. As for the dairy thing, our dairy exports to the US are so miniscule that any sort of tariff would have pretty much no impact on dairy suppliers. Even Wisconsin dairy farmers are saying that the problem is over-production not our milk. Oh, and he also slapped a tariff on our softwood lumber exports, which has been a long running dispute for the last couple of decades. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 America Jr. will do what it's told. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullerene Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 3 hours ago, NorthernLights said: Bombing Canada next is my guess... Trump is simply pointing out that a good sales model is to sell dairy products to everybody within a 100 mile radius. Sounds like a great plan but then suddenly this other country just appears from nowhere and that kind of complicates everything. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senorsoupe Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 49 minutes ago, Cerberus said: America Jr. will do what it's told. Thou shalt buy American milk? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Bombing Canada next is my guess... Canada is so big that bits of the north might have been bombed already without anyone noticing yet. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetterlund Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 I love how he describes the Tomahawk missile incident as unbelievable technology and unbelievable talent, before following up by saying they "go off" and end up in a town or city. He literally doesn't think before opening his mouth. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 2 hours ago, Zetterlund said: I love how he describes the Tomahawk missile incident as unbelievable technology and unbelievable talent, before following up by saying they "go off" and end up in a town or city. He literally doesn't think before opening his mouth. Thing that worries me is how the only time his ratings and commentary on the news channels (which he's addicted to) improved was when he launched the attack in Syria. He's being slaughtered today, his sanity is being seriously questioned on air. Morning Joe is worth a watch, the main anchor was a Republican congressman. I worry that he'll be delighted when the military come up with another idea for something quick and dramatic to boost his ratings. He still thinks he's in a reality TV show. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 Hillary Clinton is back with a bang. Says she takes "absolute personal responsibility" for the loss, before going onto blame, amongst others, Vladimir Putin, James Comey, Wikileaks and sexism. James Comey is currently in front of a Senate committee testifying that her aide, Huma Abedin, used to send classified emails to her partner Anthony Weiner so he could print them off and Clinton could read them. Comey appears to be backing off pressing charges, which seems mystifying on the face of it. A nice reminder that while in comparison to Trump she is obviously highly competent, she is quite literally the biggest failure in political history. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.