Jump to content

What's the most "Tin Pot" thing you've seen in the SPFL


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said:

I remember initially having a fair bit of sympathy for the affected clubs in that whole scenario (even hearts), and my first instinct was it would be unfair to relegate them. 

Then as the story unfolds and the alternatives were explored it became obvious quite quickly that the points per game scenario was the only feasible option. All talk of reconstruction, whether it was temporary or permanent, would have been madness. So yes, it was very unfortunate and even unfair but it was the least worst option. 

What made it hilarious was the very public and sustained meltdown from all directly involved. 

Stranraer were, in fairness, reasonably dignified.  

Thistle and Hearts were simply embarrassing.  Not all of their supporters were though - just some of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel out of everyone, we suffered the most long term because without fail, whenever Dundee put something on Twitter or a debate breaks out online, a Rangers fan comes chundering in with a joke about 'e-mail systems'.

Good bants from Nelms at the time though and good how angry it got people. Cheered up a dull time during Covid.

Quite sad to see Brian Graham saying it still fuelled him to this day in a game against us earlier last season and before they bottled it against County though. Some impact it's had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DA Baracus said:

Mins the court case about it all Hearts were certain they were going to win?

Budge being previously quoted suggesting there's too many clubs in senior football then suggesting more clubs in the top couple of leagues so Hearts etc didn't get relegated was quite funny too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully we never have to worry about anything like it again but one thing the SPFL should probably do is write some rules about how much of an incomplete season needs to be played before the result can stand

The precise number isn’t that important but it would be better than making up the rules on the fly again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said:

Hopefully we never have to worry about anything like it again but one thing the SPFL should probably do is write some rules about how much of an incomplete season needs to be played before the result can stand

The precise number isn’t that important but it would be better than making up the rules on the fly again

If they wrote a set of rules which on one hand specified how much of a season is required to be played........but were not precise about it, then we would have almost the same bleating as the covid season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said:

Hopefully we never have to worry about anything like it again but one thing the SPFL should probably do is write some rules about how much of an incomplete season needs to be played before the result can stand

The precise number isn’t that important but it would be better than making up the rules on the fly again

Did they not try that only for the clubs to vote against it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, gannonball said:

Budge being previously quoted suggesting there's too many clubs in senior football then suggesting more clubs in the top couple of leagues so Hearts etc didn't get relegated was quite funny too.

Budge's posturing really was ridiculous.  It confirmed that she genuinely does not have a clue about the sport she has a voice in.

One of her arguments was that relegation was unfair because Hearts had invested heavily in their team.  She literally thought it correct that this factor override the one about wins, losses and points accrued.  

It fed into a narrative that said the decision was somehow reached via an absurd, unfathomable formula, carefully designed to punish specific clubs.   I remember a BBC preview of the following season saying that Thistle had been relegated for reasons other than footballing ones.

As I said, Thistle were unfortunate in that the calculation saw them bottom by a tiny margin.  The calculation itself, however, made perfect sense, and was surely the only one that could be considered if a way of concluding the season was needed.

The desperate scrambles for an unnecessary reconstruction were ludicrous, and thoroughly humiliating for those doing the scrambling.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, topcat(The most tip top) said:

Hopefully we never have to worry about anything like it again but one thing the SPFL should probably do is write some rules about how much of an incomplete season needs to be played before the result can stand

The precise number isn’t that important but it would be better than making up the rules on the fly again

Agree with that and thought that at the time. 

It was amateur back then but If they still don’t have a written provision in place for an extreme event such as that then they really are ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Monkey Tennis said:

Stranraer were, in fairness, reasonably dignified.  

Thistle and Hearts were simply embarrassing.  Not all of their supporters were though - just some of them.

I think the other two are a bit higher up the self interest and importance league. Like the football league one of the same two will win it every year, but there's strong competition for the euro places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dons_1988 said:

Agree with that and thought that at the time. 

It was amateur back then but If they still don’t have a written provision in place for an extreme event such as that then they really are ridiculous. 

Logically there must be a number and precedent is set that the number must be between 1 and 30

The strongest remaining candidates would be 22 (once everybody's played each other home and away) or 19 (at least half the season is complete)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, topcat(The most tip top) said:

Logically there must be a number and precedent is set that the number must be between 1 and 30

The strongest remaining candidates would be 22 (once everybody's played each other home and away) or 19 (at least half the season is complete)

Nah, I prefer making it up. In the event of an incomplete season teams will be relegated taking into consideration;

Buttons on collars.

Bad goalkeeper shirts.

Or any other reason the Governing body see fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...