Granny Danger Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 43 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: So it's my fault the country is fucked up? I suspect Corbyn has got this one wrong, just as he did with the Salisbury poisoning case. Did you agree with his stance on that one? I think jumping to conclusions without proof, particularly when it can lead to military action in a very dangerous part of the world, is not very clever. I believe people who support such a position are not very clever. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 Looking for a scrap them Iranians 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlandmagyar 2nd Tier Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, doulikefish said: Looking for a scrap them Iranians How dare Iran do that. Surely a cast iron case for obliteration. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 Looks like one of Boris's first tasks as PM will be to sort out these pesky Iranians - making full use of his well honed diplomatic skills. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dundee Hibernian Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 48 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: Looks like one of Boris's first tasks as PM will be to sort out these pesky Iranians - making full use of his well honed diplomatic skills. No evidence then regarding the Salisbury poisonings? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, Dundee Hibernian said: No evidence then regarding the Salisbury poisonings? I thought the CCTV evidence was pretty damning, but obviously you wouldn't agree. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/05/salisbury-poisonings-police-name-and-charge-two-suspects 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Grimes Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48440449 Ruth won’t like this 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 This is the headline I'm seeing on their website : "Jeremy Hunt brands Labour leader 'pathetic' over Iran comments" I'm inclined to agree with him (Hunt)This is an indistinguishable opinion from the people in Burnley or wherever that you slag off all day on here. Have you gone native? It’s perfectly reasonable, as Corbyn and Sanders have done, to be sceptical of the United States’ baws oot desire to forge a casus belli on Iran. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 10 hours ago, Dundee Hibernian said: Can you please point me to a credible link as to the guilty party in the Salisbury cases? By 'credible', I don't mean the main stream media, I'm looking for someone reliable outlining evidence, rather than supposition. This wrapped it up for me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 9 minutes ago, NotThePars said: This is an indistinguishable opinion from the people in Burnley or wherever that you slag off all day on here. Have you gone native? It’s perfectly reasonable, as Corbyn and Sanders have done, to be sceptical of the United States’ baws oot desire to forge a casus belli on Iran. That wasn't an opinion. I was reporting the fact that Hunt had branded Corbyn as pathetic - not the BBC, as Granny was trying to suggest. You're also completely wrong with the other comment you make on that post - but I'm not going to waste time arguing with you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: That wasn't an opinion. I was reporting the fact that Hunt had branded Corbyn as pathetic - not the BBC, as Granny was trying to suggest. You're also completely wrong with the other comment you make on that post - but I'm not going to waste time arguing with you. I never suggested the BBC were the ones calling Corbyn pathetic. They had parentheses around the word so it was obvious they were quoting someone. My point was that it was a prejudicial headline and could easily have been worded differently. Many people do not read beyond the headlines but can still be influenced by the headline they read. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 54 minutes ago, Frank Grimes said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48440449 Ruth won’t like this Ruth can advise her on how to stay out of the spotlight on occasions when you want to avoid difficult questions/situations. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 This wrapped it up for me. Worst. Star Trek. Ever. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dundee Hibernian Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 1 hour ago, ICTJohnboy said: I thought the CCTV evidence was pretty damning, but obviously you wouldn't agree. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/05/salisbury-poisonings-police-name-and-charge-two-suspects The evidence you present is of two Russian men on cctv, nowhere near the site of either of the Salisbury poisonings. You can't convict on that basis, even under the warped mentality of the present British political classes. And many voters I'd have to add. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dundee Hibernian Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 30 minutes ago, welshbairn said: This wrapped it up for me. I'm of the mind these two were working for the Russian state, but because of that I'm far from convinced they had anything to do with the poisonings. I've also no doubt that, given Salisbury's proximity to Winterbourne Gunner, less than 4 miles away, the area is often visited by Russian state intelligence agents. The UK will be aware of the presence of these 'agents', just as the Russians will be well informed of British presence in their own country. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_CBRN_Centre 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 Iran. Another terrorist Regime that Jezza supports. And in the past has been paid by them. As Cilla said, surprise surprise.Aye no bother. Whilst successive British cabinets suck the Wahhabist boaby. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmer Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 Don't pay the corrupt BBC any money. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 If the U.K. really believes Salisbury was Russian state sponsored murder why have the sanctions been so powder puff? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: If the U.K. really believes Salisbury was Russian state sponsored murder why have the sanctions been so powder puff? High end London property market. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 8 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: If the U.K. really believes Salisbury was Russian state sponsored murder why have the sanctions been so powder puff? The better question is why haven't any charges been brought relating to Dawn Sturgess's death and why hasn't her inquest been held yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.