Benjamin_Nevis Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 1 hour ago, carpetmonster said: Likely most folks might’ve seen it, but that fat c**t choking himself on cinnamon will never not be funny Magnificent Fat fucking gammon c**t 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 "people say "where's your evidence? " - i have a feeling that a left wing influence has seeped in to the legal profession" Absolute moron. Then the cinnamon thing. Copying teenagers off of tik tok. What an utterly brainless buffoon. No idea who this guy is, but he's confirming all my prejudices about the cognitive abilities of your average gammon. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Angelo Barksdale Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Ervin H Burrell said: BBC I liked this bit: Asked about a claim in his 2009 book Enemy of the State that he owned seven properties, but six of them were in his wife's name, he said: "I like to give off that I am a successful man when I am not." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Job Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 George looking for a new grift 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Clown Job said: George looking for a new grift The desperation there is genuinely fantastic 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btb Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 A small victory in what often seems like a losing war.... Quote Arron Banks loses libel action against reporter Carole Cadwalladr Arron Banks loses libel action against reporter Carole Cadwalladr | Arron Banks | The Guardian 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirty dingus Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 1 hour ago, btb said: A small victory in what often seems like a losing war.... Arron Banks loses libel action against reporter Carole Cadwalladr | Arron Banks | The Guardian The amount of shit that was thrown at her from the gammonatti and bots was horrific, nearly broke her but really glad she won the libel action. It's a pity that the wealthy w**k Banks will not feel much if any effects of the loss in comparison to the effect on Cadwalladr. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duries Air Freshener Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 On 10/06/2022 at 09:10, Ervin H Burrell said: You can't trust a word Joe Mulhall says tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 11 minutes ago, Duries Air Freshener said: You can't trust a word Joe Mulhall says tbh. Quote Appearing at the Royal Courts of Justice in London at a hearing to discuss money he owes, he said at one point he was spending about £100,000 on gambling in casinos and online. He described how he wasted money on "drink, alcohol, partying" while receiving thousands of pounds in donations from supporters. Robinson said in 2020 he received about £1,000 a month from supporters and at times that figure was between £3,000 to £4,000. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-61753172 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Angelo Barksdale Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 18 minutes ago, Duries Air Freshener said: You can't trust a word Joe Mulhall says tbh. Not sure you could trust anything Yaxley-Lennon says either tbqh. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirty dingus Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 Stephen Lennon has already lost court cases for making up shit, mind you the clownshoe votes for these untrustworthy liars https://boris-johnson-lies.com/johnson-in-parliament https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/seb-dance/nigel-farage-seb-dance_b_14591852.html 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duries Air Freshener Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 1 hour ago, welshbairn said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-61753172 If it comes from Joe Mulhall, then you can be sure there's a lie somewhere. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawson Park Boy Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 2 hours ago, dirty dingus said: The amount of shit that was thrown at her from the gammonatti and bots was horrific, nearly broke her but really glad she won the libel action. It's a pity that the wealthy w**k Banks will not feel much if any effects of the loss in comparison to the effect on Cadwalladr. It’s a very small technical victory. She receives no damages, she did defame him but not to a sufficient extent. Not much of a victory but only natural that the Guardian bigs it up, I suppose. He might appeal so she’s not out of the woods yet. A rotten journalist. -6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 22 minutes ago, Duries Air Freshener said: If it comes from Joe Mulhall, then you can be sure there's a lie somewhere. This is certainly the line that some bunch of VL white supremacists came up with when he criticised them. I thought you good faith debater types frowned on ad hom arguments? Oops sorry, forgot you're practically a reactionary bot. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 9 minutes ago, Dawson Park Boy said: It’s a very small technical victory. She receives no damages, she did defame him but not to a sufficient extent. Not much of a victory but only natural that the Guardian bigs it up, I suppose. He might appeal so she’s not out of the woods yet. A rotten journalist. Why would a defendant receive damages? Gibberish 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duries Air Freshener Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 (edited) 35 minutes ago, coprolite said: This is certainly the line that some bunch of VL white supremacists came up with when he criticised them. I thought you good faith debater types frowned on ad hom arguments? Oops sorry, forgot you're practically a reactionary bot. Whether ‘VL white supremscists’ said it or not, it’s still markedly true. Edited June 13, 2022 by Duries Air Freshener 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duries Air Freshener Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 (edited) 44 minutes ago, Dawson Park Boy said: It’s a very small technical victory. She receives no damages, she did defame him but not to a sufficient extent. Not much of a victory but only natural that the Guardian bigs it up, I suppose. He might appeal so she’s not out of the woods yet. A rotten journalist. Very true, DPB. She basically admitted she was wrong, after initially attempting, and failing, to back up her mad claims. There just wasn’t enough in it for it to be defamation. I hope he appeals. Edited June 13, 2022 by Duries Air Freshener 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 11 minutes ago, Duries Air Freshener said: Very true, DPB. She basically admitted she was wrong, after initially attempting, and failing, to back up her mad claims. There just wasn’t enough in it for it to be defamation. I hope he appeals. The judge thought that given the amount of lies Banks told about his dealings with the Russian state, she made an honest attempt to get to the truth. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawson Park Boy Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 56 minutes ago, coprolite said: Why would a defendant receive damages? Gibberish You are correct. I apologise. The judge reckoned that the bulk of her false claims would be heard within her own echo chamber of followers and, as such, serious damage to Banks would not have occurred. Shes still a very poor journalist. Anyway, let’s see if he takes it further. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.